News   Mar 13, 2026
 2K     4 
News   Mar 13, 2026
 1.5K     1 
News   Mar 13, 2026
 2.3K     6 

GO Transit: Service thread (including extensions)

On the Milton line they cancelled a good number of trains. But Union also seemed less busy than normal. So I think a chunk of people stayed home today.

In the morning the cancellation of trains seemed a bit premature. In the afternoon when it turned to snow, it looked to be snowing pretty hard. But in the afternoon the weather seemed fine.

I can't really fault Metrolinx for it too much, but it is kinda annoying. Definitely a damned if they do, damned if they don't situation.
 
On the Milton line they cancelled a good number of trains. But Union also seemed less busy than normal. So I think a chunk of people stayed home today.
I was surprised at 5 pm how empty the 506 streetcar was at Woodbine - after a 40-minute gap. And how much faster it was at 5 pm, with not much traffic. Then at Main just how empty Line 2 was westbound - last year I was taking it daily and it was much busier. So much quieter driving and transit today.

In the morning the cancellation of trains seemed a bit premature. In the afternoon when it turned to snow, it looked to be snowing pretty hard. But in the afternoon the weather seemed fine.

I can't really fault Metrolinx for it too much, but it is kinda annoying. Definitely a damned if they do, damned if they don't situation.
Where were the service gaps problematic?

If they hold more trains in reserve, they are much better equipped to respond to service problems, while at the same time not having overcrowding.
 
If they hold more trains in reserve, they are much better equipped to respond to service problems, while at the same time not having overcrowding.

Having reserve trainsets may not have been the key constraint. Keeping switches clear and reducing the need to throw them to route movements might have been a factor. And getting crews to trains over bad roads.

Freezing rain and ice buildup on turnouts must have been a worry. Simplifying the operating plan helps assure operations.

- Paul
 
Having reserve trainsets may not have been the key constraint. Keeping switches clear and reducing the need to throw them to route movements might have been a factor. And getting crews to trains over bad roads.

Freezing rain and ice buildup on turnouts must have been a worry. Simplifying the operating plan helps assure operations.

- Paul
And that's precisely what their "storm service" call does. A lot of expresses get downgraded to locals, and fewer crossovers are used in an effort to minimize service disruptions during the storm. Even operations through the Flyunder are changed to help prevent trains from getting caught in there.

It also stops some of the scheduled lineside maintenance and redirects those forces to known trouble areas - particularly key interlockings, such as Wice.

Dan
 
And that's precisely what their "storm service" call does. A lot of expresses get downgraded to locals, and fewer crossovers are used in an effort to minimize service disruptions during the storm. Even operations through the Flyunder are changed to help prevent trains from getting caught in there.

It also stops some of the scheduled lineside maintenance and redirects those forces to known trouble areas - particularly key interlockings, such as Wice.

Dan

Speaking of Wice (I think it's on the Kitchener Line if memory serves), would there be any benefit to creating a structure to cover it to reduce the impacts of snow and ice? I'm almost thinking of the equilvant of the shelters used to diver rocks slides.

1771523017023.png
 
Speaking of Wice (I think it's on the Kitchener Line if memory serves), would there be any benefit to creating a structure to cover it to reduce the impacts of snow and ice? I'm almost thinking of the equilvant of the shelters used to diver rocks slides.

That's an interesting thought - I have always wondered along the same lines. It might just take too large and massive a structure to be practical or economically viable - to meet clearance requirements (with provision for electrification) it would have to be very high; to handle an interlocking such as Wice it would have to be extremely long (the interlocking itself can stretch for a fair distance, and there would have to be added length to protect against blowing snow), and I have wondered if over the course of winter, exposure to sunlight might be more of an advantage than the exposure to the elements is a problem. And any permanent structure would then work against any rearrangement of track and switches. Also, ice and snow falling off passing trains rather than rainfall or snowfall is often the problem.

I have always wondered about a sailcloth version that is removed in spring and re-installed in fall, but that again is a load of work and demands a permanent structure to support it.

Deploying a few track workers as needed with the right work equipment, and installing high volume snow melters, seems a lot more manageable.

The railways have started along those lines with Rail Inspection Portals as a strategy for all-weather wayside remote monitoring, but these are not even the length of a single turnout and only one track wide.

- Paul
 
Anyone know why there is a slow order leaving Dixie going east, but trains run at regular speed going west?
 
Jeez, someone get those lovely people at TTR / Metrolinx / Wherever some better cameras and monitors. I think my old Nokia captures better video than that...
So how did the engineer know to stop the train 12 cars ahead? Did a passenger pull the emergency brake?
 
After riding a refurbished GO cab car I believe that the Venture Cab cars are louder inside.

Could it be how or where the horn is Mounted?
 


A GO train carrying 120 passengers was within seconds of derailing near Oakville earlier this year, according to an internal Metrolinx report...which [it] says was the fourth time a GO train sped past a stop signal over the previous 12 months.

[...]

"...a westbound GO train...blew through a stop signal and crossed over to a different track at about 112 km/h when it should have only been travelling at about 24 km/h..."

[...]

According to the Metrolinx report, an internal investigation would be completed within 60 to 75 days of the incident. But no report has so far been made public and there is no indication from the provincial transit agency that it will be.
Alstom did not respond to the Star’s request for comment before deadline. [...]

“The incident is being reviewed under established rail safety protocols,” said Dakota Brasier, a spokesperson for the Ontario minister of transportation. [...]

Nic Defalco, a spokesperson for the Transportation Safety Board, the federal agency in charge of investigating safety incidents on Canada’s railway network, told the Star it is not currently investigating the Jan. 5 incident.

In a statement to the Star, Metrolinx spokesperson Lyndsay Miller said that the two Alstom operators of the train have been dismissed.
“While taking GO Transit continues to be one of the safest ways to travel, this incident provides an important opportunity to reinforce safety compliance across our rail network,” Miller said.
Ian Naish, former director of rail investigations at the TSB, said it was “extremely surprising” the train didn’t actually derail.
Had the train driver braked 1.5 seconds later, as laid out in the report, “it had the potential to have been one of the worst recorded Metrolinx accidents in its 16-year history,” Naish said. “A high-speed derailment would likely have resulted in multiple passenger injuries and, possibly, some fatalities.”

[...]

Since 2001, the TSB has called for fail-safes that guard against speeding and the subsequent derailments that often occur, but it has not been nationally mandated.
GO Transit currently doesn’t have the safety systems that have become widespread in modern railway systems.
In 2024, Metrolinx announced it would roll out a European-standard signalling system that would include train protection as part of its GO expansion plans. The transit agency has not provided a timeline for when the new signalling system would be implemented.
“The level of protection that GO Transit operates with is essentially the same as Britain’s operating system in the 1940s,” Dennis said.
Meanwhile, the Ontario government and Metrolinx have run increased service on several of the GO network’s busiest routes, including the Lakeshore West and East lines, the Barrie line and the Stouffville line.
“If you’re going to see an increasing level of service on GO transit — as is happening right now — and not seeing a commensurate increase in the level of protection … is that acceptable?” Dennis said. “I would postulate that it isn’t.”

[...]

Neither the January GO incident, nor February’s derailment at Union Station will be subject to an independent investigation, because the TSB has no jurisdiction to investigate safety incidents on provincially owned railways, which is the case for the majority of the GO network.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW


The agency said it only investigates incidents on provincial railways at the request of the Ontario Ministry of Transportation. It also confirmed that there is only one active GO investigation: a signal passed at danger in 2024 that nearly resulted in a collision outside of Aldershot GO Station.
Instead, Metrolinx will conduct its own investigation, with no guarantee the results will be made public as there is no requirement to do so. No public reports on signals passed at danger in the past year have been published.
The TSB has, in the past, called for more regulatory oversight of the GO network, either by the Ministry of Transportation or another government body, as part of a 2023 TSB report on a 2019 incident on Lancaster Street in Kitchener where an adult and child were struck by a GO train.
“Given the current complex (Ontario Ministry of Transportation) regulatory framework that involves multiple agreements, there are gaps in the oversight processes that can lead to occasions when the (Ontario Ministry of Transportation) will not be able to provide effective safety oversight,” the TSB wrote in its report. “The Board is concerned that the Province of Ontario does not provide effective safety oversight of provincially regulated railways.”
More transparency can help spur better regulations and safety technology said Naish, the former TSB director. But as it stands, Metrolinx and the GO network have no independent oversight aside from the provincial government.
“There’s just so much we don’t know … There’s no accountability,” Naish added. “I know it causes bureaucracy and it costs money, but you need to be accountable.”
 

Back
Top