Bordercollie
Senior Member
What can you do? It's a union shop.Its the TTC's in-house crew.
What can you do? It's a union shop.Its the TTC's in-house crew.
Hook up some autoracks or those mail carrying box cars that Amtrak had that were rated for higher speeds. That should help. Considering these are parked for 7 months of the year it's kinda a waste. I guess they can carry strollers in the winter time. How many SUV children buggy's can a bike car hold?Gonna need a couple more bike coaches on the Niagara train, there’s 182 bikes and the 3 bike coaches can only hold 80. View attachment 423278
It's good that people are using it. Keeps cars off the road.
Don’t you know it. I went cycling on the rail trail around Palgrave today. The count of parked cars with bike racks was pretty impressive.
But really, needing a car to go cycling is bizarre. As we densify, we need to be able to find spaces away from each other. We won’t all fit in the Don Valley.
- Paul
But on top of the bike coach you can still have 2 bikes per regular car minus the accessibility coach right?The Toronto Trails strategy will be part of the answer; as will Cycle Tracks in the City, as will Bike Coaches on GO Trains, and implementation of the cycling routes for Rouge Park (on or adjacent to roads, not the through the valley interiors).
Lots more to do.
Edit to add, the Escarpment and Wine Country (both Niagara and PEC) are beautiful spots and ride-worthy, but cycling facilities on/adjacent to roads remain hit and miss; and the Waterfront Trail remains and unfinished dream.
But on top of the bike coach you can still have 2 bikes per regular car minus the accessibility coach right?
I'd advocate for a lot of the commuter trains to have 1 bike coach. Currently you can't bring a bike on the train if commuting, which makes the last mile connection from the station to your destination difficult. Obviously you need the service levels so that trains have the capacity to dedicate a level to bikes. But in the long run, promoting a bike to the station and bike away from the station strategy would be beneficial in reducing the park and ride nature of GO.Considering these are parked for 7 months of the year it's kinda a waste
Pre-pandemic I think GO used to have a no bikes on trains during rush hours policy (similar to the TTC). Does that still apply?
There are systems in Europe that don't allow bikes on during peak time. Then some charge a fare to bring the bike on X.Pre-pandemic I think GO used to have a no bikes on trains during rush hours policy (similar to the TTC). Does that still apply?
Toronto could really use NYC's dedicated bus ramps right now. Makes no sense that GO has to compete with car traffic this way.
For 3 GO bus routes, 2 of which are to be replaced by trains in the near future? I fully support extending the bus lane in front of the terminal, but dedicated flyover ramps would à la Port Authority Bus Terminal would be impossible to justify in our context.Toronto could really use NYC's dedicated bus ramps right now. Makes no sense that GO has to compete with car traffic this way.
The reason that most rail operators limit bikes on board (via a surcharge and/or time-of-day restrictions) is that bikes are very space-intensive. For the space of one paying customer with a bike, you could carry 2 or 3 paying customers without bikes.I'd advocate for a lot of the commuter trains to have 1 bike coach. Currently you can't bring a bike on the train if commuting, which makes the last mile connection from the station to your destination difficult. Obviously you need the service levels so that trains have the capacity to dedicate a level to bikes. But in the long run, promoting a bike to the station and bike away from the station strategy would be beneficial in reducing the park and ride nature of GO.