kEiThZ
Superstar
What's the timeline for all these lines to be RER'd? Anybody have that info?
Not at all, and also this isn't really the right thread to debate communist/facist ideas.
It always was in the universities ... but hang on .. extreme left? There's no evidence of that. Equality and equity aren't even far left let alone extreme left! The article doesn't even mention socialists, just liberals ... which are very centrist, and are at best (worst) slightly left!
But to go back on topic - do you think the NDP wouldn't cancel transit expansion again, or are you simply trying to troll by changing the subject, and taking what was said out of context?
Has TC said this publicly somewhere?2) TC should be in process to accept Alternative FRA compliance by end of next year, hopefully sooner.
During the announcement they said the RFP will be released the next day (so, yesterday). Watch the video.I don't think they're even confirmed when they'll issue the request for proposals yet - Let alone when they are due and when they'll announce the winner!
When will Metrolinx actually decide who wins the contract? If they are going catenary they better get a move on because they will have to electrify the entire 200km RER system and order the trains all to be running by 2025. Did they mention when the proposals have to be in by and when the decision will be announced?
Probably more likely in a week or two then. No indication on the IO website that they were issuing last week. 24-hours would be an unprecedented turn-around from IO.During the announcement they said the RFP will be released the next day (so, yesterday). Watch the video.
When does the contract with Bombardier expire? That might give us some idea of what they are targeting.
I find your point interesting....but bordering on fantasy. Exactly how is the 'Brampton to Georgetown' segment going to be addressed? Or do you mean just to Bramalea, as the RER scheme always presented?I’d guess the winning strategy would be to maximize Kitchener first
Yeahhh...I'm not being a doubting Thomas on this, just I'd love to see a reference in print. And what conditions placed on it if approved?Has TC said this publicly somewhere?Mapleson said:
2) TC should be in process to accept Alternative FRA compliance by end of next year, hopefully sooner.
Words are cheap. Show me a signed *binding* agreement, one this QP regime can't "legislate" away. That point continues into CIB investment too, even though it's "debt financed" something meticulously avoided being mentioned at the "announcement". Odd that...During the announcement they said the RFP will be released the next day (so, yesterday). Watch the video.
Yes, I was mostly referring to the RER segment that doesn't extend into the CN territory. Since the Freight Bypass was cancelled in April's budget, the only way you electrify all the way to Kitchener is using some battery technology to bridge that section.I find your point interesting....but bordering on fantasy. Exactly how is the 'Brampton to Georgetown' segment going to be addressed? Or do you mean just to Bramalea, as the RER scheme always presented?
I am very skeptical about it myself, and it's based on a chain of recognitions, but it's the closest we've ever been to realising lighter trains.Yeahhh...I'm not being a doubting Thomas on this, just I'd love to see a reference in print. And what conditions placed on it if approved?
There is nothing QP can sign that QP can't break. However, this private debt regime lets them put billions of debts on the books, but not have it officially count against the deficit.Words are cheap. Show me a signed *binding* agreement, one this QP regime can't "legislate" away. That point continues into CIB investment too, even though it's "debt financed" something meticulously avoided being mentioned at the "announcement". Odd that...
The buck stop with the taxpayer always. P3 are a good way to keep debt off the books, but when things get risky, the joint-venture vehicle can just declare bankruptcy and walk away. Canada doesn't have laws that support going after the parent company in such instances, so they get all the upside if things of well and none of the downside if things go poorly. When a procurement grows to this size, the government has a vested interest to pour more money into the pit just to avoid a bigger gaping hole in the future. I don't agree with the model, but I'm highly confident that the Conservatives will back this all the so long as they can sign the final deal before the next election. If it spills over that, it's fair game for years of lost time.Or does the 'buck stop' with private investors who accept all the risk of financing the debt behind this? Answers are needed.
Four bidders and $13B is the infrastructure costs. You can probably assume $1B+ per year in operating costs (ignoring fare revenues). I'd also be surprised if they'd evaluate the bids so quickly, knowing government in general. I'd be guessing 2-2.5 years for everything, which gives a timeline of 1 year for each half and 3 months delay on each half getting it done.For something this size I would assume at least a one year RFP timeline. So, they may get the bids back in May 2020 and then make a decision. Maybe the gov would need six months to make a decision and see if the bids have costs the gov is willing to live with? IE how close do the two bidders come to 13B
This link has been updated:Probably more likely in a week or two then. No indication on the IO website that they were issuing last week. 24-hours would be an unprecedented turn-around from IO.
When does the contract with Bombardier expire? That might give us some idea of what they are targeting.