adma
Superstar
Fascinating, but I don't get it. Simply because they were built in a specific era, they should be heritage properties, even if the architecture is depressing at best? I know it's subjective, but I'd be surprised if many people would rather have them in eyesight than not.
On another note, I'm still not clear on your attitude towards Brutalism. If you like it, so be it, I just can't grasp whether you're defending it, or making fun of it.
I'm defending it. And here's a further UT thread celebrating it
Indeed, in state-of-the-art heritage circles these days, a resolute anti-Brutalist stance will go down as well as Rob Ford's approach to Pride...