The lands next-door to the School are now nominated by the City as a HOUSING NOW site... need to determine the viability of a co-build with TDSB to create some meaningful Transit-Oriented Development as part of the school rebuild and the nearby LRT...
View attachment 357124
DETAILS -
https://www.toronto.ca/news/city-of...reation-and-protection-of-affordable-housing/
A couple of thoughts here:
I'm not opposed to working w/the school, but for a variety of reasons, I expect that might not the best opportunity here to think big.
The TDSB has tight budgets, approved through the ministry, faces a timeline crunch to get the building back up and running, and I would assume some pressure to retain the heritage facades as well.
None of that precludes some creativity.............but FWIW...........I might be more interested to look at the below:
From left to right:
1) The York Civic Centre (former York City Hall). To my understanding, the functions here are to consolidated w/those of the Etobicoke Civic Centre at the new facility at Six Points (Bloor/Dundas).
* that may have change, but was, at one point, the intent. If that is still the case, this site may be vacated as soon as 2025, its all City owned. *the building to rear may be part of the High School, and that
could be looked at in any reconstruction of the HS, the simple act of consolidating that to the main building, where surface parking is currently, could free up the land for affordable housing.
2) Another City owned site, this one directly contiguous to proposed Housing Now Site. It provides Eglinton frontage, and nominally moves any development closer to the Crosstown Station making it easier to argue for height.
This site includes an existing Community Recreation Centre which would have to be relocated. But as the facility is aging........and ther emight be an even larger, City-Owned site, literally across the street that might become available......
3) The new entrance for the Crosstown at Keelesdale Stn. I'm not sure if this site is development ready, and would obviously require participation from Mx. However with a ~6,000ft2 floorplate, right over a transit station.....its attention-worthy. Not City-owned.....but....what if the City acquired the 'rights' to develop affordable housing here, and purchased the store fronts next door. They're non-descript and would not be missed; and together w/the Mx site would make an excellent footprint.