News   Nov 01, 2024
 1.9K     11 
News   Nov 01, 2024
 2.1K     2 
News   Nov 01, 2024
 691     0 

Cycling: West Toronto Railpath (City of Toronto, Phase II Proposed)

Can we ask where in the process of debate over this proposal, the public is likely to be able to view the underlying costing information of this proposal? I believe you and others were trying to obtain such information, but might it become more public in the process of acceptance or rejection?

In thinking of your comment I remembered this page:


The PDF in here I bet has the type of breakdown of costs you and others would enjoy seeing for projects in Toronto.
 
In thinking of your comment I remembered this page:


The PDF in here I bet has the type of breakdown of costs you and others would enjoy seeing for projects in Toronto.
Thanks very much. Have downloaded and skimmed through the first few pages. Later tonight I'll get a chance to read in more detail. Again, thanks for the insight.
 
Thanks very much. Have downloaded and skimmed through the first few pages. Later tonight I'll get a chance to read in more detail. Again, thanks for the insight.

Any time. I always try to think when these types of matters come up, how can we proactively move forward and advocate for change?
 
Building a continuous grade-separated cycling trail in a dense part of the city without ravines is going to be expensive. It's no different from building a subway downtown or the Gardiner Expressway in this regard, though the costs are still far lower than those associated with a subway or expressway.

The notion that you can get rapid transit in Toronto for around $150 million per kilometre is disingenuous. You'll get a streetcar or a slow LRT that stops for left-turning vehicles for that price in Toronto. 1 km of that isn't very helpful from a transportation perspective.

Despite the costs, the benefits of the proposed extension are massive from a transportation perspective. Many more people will get a quick and safe way of getting around without a car, which helps both cyclists and everyone on the road. Scrutinize the costs all you want, but make sure it gets built.
 
Building a continuous grade-separated cycling trail in a dense part of the city without ravines is going to be expensive. It's no different from building a subway downtown or the Gardiner Expressway in this regard, though the costs are still far lower than those associated with a subway or expressway.

The notion that you can get rapid transit in Toronto for around $150 million per kilometre is disingenuous. You'll get a streetcar or a slow LRT that stops for left-turning vehicles for that price in Toronto. 1 km of that isn't very helpful from a transportation perspective.

Despite the costs, the benefits of the proposed extension are massive from a transportation perspective. Many more people will get a quick and safe way of getting around without a car, which helps both cyclists and everyone on the road. Scrutinize the costs all you want, but make sure it gets built.
Someone ran the math on our subway expansions and determined the bureaucratic Germans managed to pay less than half what we do for new expansions in significantly older cities.
 
Building a continuous grade-separated cycling trail in a dense part of the city without ravines is going to be expensive. It's no different from building a subway downtown or the Gardiner Expressway in this regard, though the costs are still far lower than those associated with a subway or expressway.

The notion that you can get rapid transit in Toronto for around $150 million per kilometre is disingenuous. You'll get a streetcar or a slow LRT that stops for left-turning vehicles for that price in Toronto. 1 km of that isn't very helpful from a transportation perspective.

Despite the costs, the benefits of the proposed extension are massive from a transportation perspective. Many more people will get a quick and safe way of getting around without a car, which helps both cyclists and everyone on the road. Scrutinize the costs all you want, but make sure it gets built.
This is true to a degree. The problem is this corridor has been under construction since Georgetown South Project in 2009ish (?). Discussion of this project happening has pre-dated that. Through the original GTS and subsequent implementation of the fourth track, necessary future-proofing (e.g. utility relocations, structure modifications) should have been built in that it avoided major barriers that would send the price tag north. Without a financial breakdown, this looks like either a) Metrolinx mismanaged the corridor work in a way that some major item / conflict was missed, b) something was indeed reasonably unforeseen and has now come to light, c) a previously accounted cost is getting lumped into this figure, or d) Metrolinx wants to reimbursed for their efforts to facilitate this project.
 
Meanwhile in Josh Marlow's own ward the city shows how great it is at delivering projects that were promised to residents a decade ago... Eglinton Connects. Eglinton landscaping including bike lanes. I wonder what the price would be to deliver that as planned and when we would see it.
 
Meanwhile in Josh Marlow's own ward the city shows how great it is at delivering projects that were promised to residents a decade ago... Eglinton Connects. Eglinton landscaping including bike lanes. I wonder what the price would be to deliver that as planned and when we would see it.

Eglinton Connects is approved; Avenue to Chaplin will go this year, should start by Sept; the balance will be delivered next year.

Its a whole lot less than 150M, for a lot more than 2km!
 
Eglinton Connects is approved; Avenue to Chaplin will go this year, should start by Sept; the balance will be delivered next year.

Its a whole lot less than 150M, for a lot more than 2km!
That contract was written before Metrolinx figured out that they could hold the lanes hostage unless the city paid to backfill the road
 
Eglinton Connects is approved; Avenue to Chaplin will go this year, should start by Sept; the balance will be delivered next year.

Its a whole lot less than 150M, for a lot more than 2km!
Are you sure? The last I heard it become EglintonTOday, which is a scaled down non-permanent version and of course painting lines on an existing street, not creating or moving any infrastructure, and not fully separating bikes from potential conflicts is cheaper than 150M.

What makes the West Toronto Railpath expensive is that they aren't converting an abandoned rail corridor, painting lines on an existing street, or creating a bike path that has a level street and railway crossings. The West Toronto Railpath is the like a limited access bikeway built from scratch.
 
Are you sure? The last I heard it become EglintonTOday, which is a scaled down non-permanent version and of course painting lines on an existing street, not creating or moving any infrastructure, and not fully separating bikes from potential conflicts is cheaper than 150M.

Where no reconstruction of Eglinton is currently planned, cycle tracks will be installed in an 'interim' condition, for the most part. (painted, with flexiposts), though there are a few enhancements.

Reconstruction will bring the next level, in due course.

What makes the West Toronto Railpath expensive is that they aren't converting an abandoned rail corridor, painting lines on an existing street, or creating a bike path that has a level street and railway crossings. The West Toronto Railpath is the like a limited access bikeway built from scratch.

I am confident in my assertion that the Rail Path is over priced. As in VERY confident. That's all I can say..........for now.
 
Last edited:
Hmmm, I wonder how this came about:

1728049239850.png

1728049271144.png

1728049291157.png


 

Back
Top