Cycling infrastructure (Separated bike lanes)

[TwoWheelPoli]

One more public consultation for cyclists in Scarborough. This time for the Malvern Neighbourhood Connections.

You can attend the public drop-in event on Tuesday, June 24 (7:00-8:30 PM) at St. Columba Catholic School (10 John Tabor Trail) or complete the survey by Tuesday, July 8.

Malvern Neighbourhood Connections

City Council has approved the proposed changes on Crow Trail, Brenyon Way and Casebridge Court, Venture Drive and Water Tower Gate. A copy of the staff report is available at IE26.6.

www.toronto.ca

 

[TheGrimSweeper]

The Terminator with a big endorsement for Toronto's bike lanes.

https://www.thestar.com/entertainme...cle_cd996410-57da-4947-a5a7-f074129f8373.html

 

[Northern Light]

One more public consultation for cyclists in Scarborough. This time for the Malvern Neighbourhood Connections.

You can attend the public drop-in event on Tuesday, June 24 (7:00-8:30 PM) at St. Columba Catholic School (10 John Tabor Trail) or complete the survey by Tuesday, July 8.

Malvern Neighbourhood Connections

City Council has approved the proposed changes on Crow Trail, Brenyon Way and Casebridge Court, Venture Drive and Water Tower Gate. A copy of the staff report is available at IE26.6.

www.toronto.ca

That's a modest, but really solid package. The effect is somewhat limited to the immediate community but it should definitely improved safety and encourage walking and biking.

 

[TwoWheelPoli]

That's a modest, but really solid package. The effect is somewhat limited to the immediate community but it should definitely improved safety and encourage walking and biking.

Well, NL, you weren't kidding when you mentioned there were a lot of consultations coming down the pipe.

 

[Northern Light]

Well, NL, you weren't kidding when you mentioned there were a lot of consultations coming down the pipe.

There's more coming...........a fair bit............

 

[ThenWhat]

It's a small thing but it bothers me that the city's graphic here shows various "recommended cycling streets" with zero actual infrastructure as part of the solid lined "existing cycling network." This includes Old Park, which runs north of Eglinton in Upper Village, and Elm Ridge, which runs E-W just above the Belt Line. Those streets are often congested with impatient SUVs trying to get to Eglinton or the Allen, and there is nowhere safe for a cyclist to ride. Even Lascelles just west of Yonge, while a fine quiet street to ride on and part of the city's now defunct numbered cycling routes, has no bike lanes.

It all feels like puffing up the very poor and disjointed network. It's misleading and outdated, at best. Those streets are useful suggestions given the lack of real cycling infra, but they aren't a cycling network.

What bothers me even more is that information about bicycle path/trail/lane closures is very difficult to find. The city has an official map of cycling routes at

Cycling Network Map

The map below shows all the cycling infrastructure in Toronto separated by type. Plan your route by entering your address or start location in the search bar to view the cycling network. To search by bikeway type, click on “Filter Results” and select the type of bikeway from the drop-down menu...

www.toronto.ca

How difficult would it be to add to it information about closures? Next to it there is another page with a map of road closures, but it only shows road closures of course. With half a dozen Toronto strategies, visions and plans for bicycling and frequent public pronouncements, you would think helping people plan how to get from A to B on bicycle would be in somebody's job description.

 

[txlseries4]

What a fumble...

‘Error in judgement’: City staff recommend cancelling Jones Ave. bike lane upgrade

The city miscalculated how much on-street parking would need to be removed for a protected cycle track to be installed on Jones Avenue

www.torontotoday.ca

Some excerpts:

City staff initially estimated the upgrade to a cycle track would require the removal of 30 of the 78 parking spots on the street, due to constraints with road width.

But according to Jacquelyn Hayward, director of transportation planning at the City of Toronto, staff underestimated the actual loss of parking needed, meaning city council approved a plan “quite different from what was possible.”

Instead of 30 lost parking spaces, the plan would actually require the removal of 48 spots.

The miscalculation arose because city staff didn’t take into consideration the loss of parking required near intersections, where tapers would be installed to help control traffic flow.

Hayward called the loss of an additional 18 parking spaces “significant” because permit parking in the area is highly utilized. In 2023, 58 parking permits were issued for the 78 parking spots on the street, according to a city report.

That’s why city staff are now recommending councillors rescind approval of the cycle track upgrade and proceed with a plan to maintain the painted bike lane with some additional safety features.

Meanwhile, 35 per cent of respondents were against maintaining the painted bike lane because they felt it didn’t provide adequate protection for cyclists. Overall, 63 per cent of those polled said they did not feel safe cycling on Jones Avenue.

 

[afransen]

What a fumble...

‘Error in judgement’: City staff recommend cancelling Jones Ave. bike lane upgrade

The city miscalculated how much on-street parking would need to be removed for a protected cycle track to be installed on Jones Avenue

www.torontotoday.ca

Some excerpts:

City staff initially estimated the upgrade to a cycle track would require the removal of 30 of the 78 parking spots on the street, due to constraints with road width.

But according to Jacquelyn Hayward, director of transportation planning at the City of Toronto, staff underestimated the actual loss of parking needed, meaning city council approved a plan “quite different from what was possible.”

Instead of 30 lost parking spaces, the plan would actually require the removal of 48 spots.

The miscalculation arose because city staff didn’t take into consideration the loss of parking required near intersections, where tapers would be installed to help control traffic flow.

Hayward called the loss of an additional 18 parking spaces “significant” because permit parking in the area is highly utilized. In 2023, 58 parking permits were issued for the 78 parking spots on the street, according to a city report.

That’s why city staff are now recommending councillors rescind approval of the cycle track upgrade and proceed with a plan to maintain the painted bike lane with some additional safety features.

Meanwhile, 35 per cent of respondents were against maintaining the painted bike lane because they felt it didn’t provide adequate protection for cyclists. Overall, 63 per cent of those polled said they did not feel safe cycling on Jones Avenue.

Could they try asking the 58 permit holders to give their number for what it would take as a cash payout to forego their permit? See what number the 18th person provided and give all those people that amount. On the scale of what we spend on infrastructure projects, even if it was $10k per permit, that would not be an undue fiscal burden.

 

[Toronto1834]

What a fumble...

‘Error in judgement’: City staff recommend cancelling Jones Ave. bike lane upgrade

The city miscalculated how much on-street parking would need to be removed for a protected cycle track to be installed on Jones Avenue

www.torontotoday.ca

Some excerpts:

City staff initially estimated the upgrade to a cycle track would require the removal of 30 of the 78 parking spots on the street, due to constraints with road width.

But according to Jacquelyn Hayward, director of transportation planning at the City of Toronto, staff underestimated the actual loss of parking needed, meaning city council approved a plan “quite different from what was possible.”

Instead of 30 lost parking spaces, the plan would actually require the removal of 48 spots.

The miscalculation arose because city staff didn’t take into consideration the loss of parking required near intersections, where tapers would be installed to help control traffic flow.

Hayward called the loss of an additional 18 parking spaces “significant” because permit parking in the area is highly utilized. In 2023, 58 parking permits were issued for the 78 parking spots on the street, according to a city report.

That’s why city staff are now recommending councillors rescind approval of the cycle track upgrade and proceed with a plan to maintain the painted bike lane with some additional safety features.

Meanwhile, 35 per cent of respondents were against maintaining the painted bike lane because they felt it didn’t provide adequate protection for cyclists. Overall, 63 per cent of those polled said they did not feel safe cycling on Jones Avenue.

That is outrageous. The existing door zone "cycling lane" is very dangerous and removing the parking on one side of the street to create a cycle track is the only serious way to fix the problem. Rebuilding this as-is to cycling standards of 1998 would be stupid.

 

[Northern Light]

What a fumble...

‘Error in judgement’: City staff recommend cancelling Jones Ave. bike lane upgrade

The city miscalculated how much on-street parking would need to be removed for a protected cycle track to be installed on Jones Avenue

www.torontotoday.ca

Some excerpts:

City staff initially estimated the upgrade to a cycle track would require the removal of 30 of the 78 parking spots on the street, due to constraints with road width.

But according to Jacquelyn Hayward, director of transportation planning at the City of Toronto, staff underestimated the actual loss of parking needed, meaning city council approved a plan “quite different from what was possible.”

Instead of 30 lost parking spaces, the plan would actually require the removal of 48 spots.

The miscalculation arose because city staff didn’t take into consideration the loss of parking required near intersections, where tapers would be installed to help control traffic flow.

Hayward called the loss of an additional 18 parking spaces “significant” because permit parking in the area is highly utilized. In 2023, 58 parking permits were issued for the 78 parking spots on the street, according to a city report.

That’s why city staff are now recommending councillors rescind approval of the cycle track upgrade and proceed with a plan to maintain the painted bike lane with some additional safety features.

Meanwhile, 35 per cent of respondents were against maintaining the painted bike lane because they felt it didn’t provide adequate protection for cyclists. Overall, 63 per cent of those polled said they did not feel safe cycling on Jones Avenue.

On the initial miscalculation.............mistakes happen. Not an excuse, shouldn't have happened, but when things like this go in for approval-in-principle they haven't yet gone through schematic design or working drawings.

While it would have been nice if staff had a more accurate picture of things initially, its equally likely with Councillor Fletcher that she would have just spiked the thing at that earlier point.

The problem here is not tackling the radical under-pricing of parking permits.

The cost of the permit the majority of people get (no parking on site where you live) is $23 per month.

But at Queen/Jones, if you went to rent a monthly spot on the private market, you wouldn't find one cheaper than $120.

Even a second parking permit for the same household is only $67 per month; while some a household with on-site parking pays $93.

How about, the entry level permit is $110, and the other two class of permits are merged at $140?

IF you do that, demand will drop, lot of spaces will be empty.

If you also transfer the windfall to the TTC to be used for better service/lower fares........even more spots empty out.

The Jones bus is every 13M in rush hour, and every 22M off-peak.

You want people on Jones to stop owning so many cars........?

Rush hour service every 10M or better, off-peak every 15M or better is the minimum requirement.

 

[Erich Nelson]

I wanted an easy way to check the overall progress of Toronto's 2025-2027 cycling program and the expected start dates of each one, so I made a summary table in google sheets (preview below). I matched each project name/status category with the expected construction timeline from TOINview, and used various sources to verify their actual progress (i.e. this thread, Toronto Cycling twitter... rest in the spreadsheet). There's quite a few projects listed as underway when the table was published (July 2024) that I haven't found anything on. Two Wheeled Politics also keeps a very in-depth table of completed projects but not the same info on the current program. Happy to make anyone an editor if they are interested, I will also periodically update it

 

[DSCToronto]

I wanted an easy way to check the overall progress of Toronto's 2025-2027 cycling program and the expected start dates of each one, so I made a summary table in google sheets (preview below). I matched each project name/status category with the expected construction timeline from TOINview, and used various sources to verify their actual progress (i.e. this thread, Toronto Cycling twitter... rest in the spreadsheet). There's quite a few projects listed as underway when the table was published (July 2024) that I haven't found anything on. Two Wheeled Politics also keeps a very in-depth table of completed projects but not the same info on the current program. Happy to make anyone an editor if they are interested, I will also periodically update it

View attachment 658844

For the first time for several years I cycled down the Rosedale Valley Road trail today. It is a bit better than it used to be but I seem to remember there were (and still are??) plans to make it better and if nothing else it needs more paving work!

 

[robmausser]

For the first time for several years I cycled down the Rosedale Valley Road trail today. It is a bit better than it used to be but I seem to remember there were (and still are??) plans to make it better and if nothing else it needs more paving work!

There are lots of Trails projects that get missed or forgotten about because they are all done by different parts of the city.

For example; the Davenport Diamond greenway project will eventually feature a multi use trail.

The Etobicoke greenway project will have a multi use trail, I believe its being built or at least led in some way by the Hydro company.

There are still ongoing plans for the corridor next to Allen to have a greenway/trail.

There is the ongoing Green Line project. Although from what I can see they futzd that one up and the trails are meandering and don't even connect to each other well.

The full Bentway implementation under the Gardiner will feature a Multi Use Trail.

Etc etc.

 

[TwoWheelPoli]

On Friday, I saw new cycle tracks were installed on Hallam from Bartlett to Dufferin, while the construction notice related to the project indicated a contraflow on Millicent from Dufferin to Emerson will also be part of that work. The Wallace and Emerson contraflows are expected to be put in next month per city staff.

@enter username , thanks for sharing that table. Would suggest clarifying which segments are involved.

I didn't list any 2025 installations yet, but will need to soon given that I identified Hallam as completed. I heard Steeles from Brimley to McCowan is under construction along with Esplanade-Mill west of Jarvis.

 

[Northern Light]

For the first time for several years I cycled down the Rosedale Valley Road trail today. It is a bit better than it used to be but I seem to remember there were (and still are??) plans to make it better and if nothing else it needs more paving work!

Its currently in detailed design, that is being done by TRCA.

Work might start fall' 25, if not, then spring '26, should be done by the middle of next year, fingers crossed.