News   Apr 17, 2026
 827     0 
News   Apr 17, 2026
 1.9K     6 
News   Apr 17, 2026
 775     0 

Cycling infrastructure (Separated bike lanes)

Ok, so you're asking about the bridge part specifically, got'cha.

The curb lane is ~4.9M which should allow 1.4M of space to be repurposed. The existing sidewalk is ~1.5M. That gives you' 2.9M

The inner lane is ~3.4M, you can probably shave another 0.2 off that.

That gives enough for a trail/sidewalk, but without a barrier.

It would be a very tight squeeze to add one.

The bridge has a seam down the middle, two discrete decks, so, unfortunately, you can't shift space from the up direction to the down without a very big project.

But a raised, 3M path should be viable w/o ripping everything up. I say that w/o knowing where they've run the utilities or the exact engineering.....but I think is a solid....'guess'.



Parts of the Bruce are gorgeous.

View attachment 636360

This one (below) is from Hamilton:

View attachment 636362
Just closing the loop on our previous conversation - I heard back from the city of Hamilton Re: Jolly Cut cycling access and that missing gap along Arkledun. It's definitely on their radar, they mentioned that they're looking at some capital funding to revamp the infrastructure in that gap and it sounds like they want to time it with a road improvement project.

Semi-related, went for a long ride yesterday from Hamilton to Mapleview and the cycling infrastructure in Burlington has really improved quite a bit along York and Plains Road. There's still a few awful sections (ex the freeway ramps) and a small gap where all the cycling infrastructure disappears entirely, but Burlington talked big talk about being a cycling friendly city and it's nice to see them put their money where their mouth is, at least from the Royal Botanical Gardens to Aldershot (where everything disappears).
 
From Liam Casey with the Canadian Press: Ontario open to compromise with Toronto on removal of three bike lanes

"Toronto's proposal includes returning two car lanes to University Avenue near the city's hospital row, narrowing the bike lanes and removing on-street parking, said a source familiar with the plan."
Still dont understand the obsession over on-street parking. Even my buddy whos totally against bike lanes doesnt understand why we have it on streets like queen
 
Still dont understand the obsession over on-street parking. Even my buddy whos totally against bike lanes doesnt understand why we have it on streets like queen
In spots, (such as at the corner of University), the sidewalks on Queen are dangerously narrow, too. I see people walk on the outer side of the subway entrances and onto the street all the time.

Removing parking to expand the sidewalk would be one potential improvement. However, my preferred option would be to close Queen from car traffic from the parking lot at city hall all the way west to Bathurst, and only allow bikes, streetcars, and pedestrians through during business hours.
 
From Liam Casey with the Canadian Press: Ontario open to compromise with Toronto on removal of three bike lanes

"Toronto's proposal includes returning two car lanes to University Avenue near the city's hospital row, narrowing the bike lanes and removing on-street parking, said a source familiar with the plan."
LOL

“Where both a reinstated car lane and a bike lane can exist, we are open to collaboration with the City of Toronto, provided they fund their portion of their identified infrastructure needs,” Brasier said.

The City did fund its portion of its identified infrastructure needs. The province is the party that wants extra now, it can pay.
 
Still dont understand the obsession over on-street parking. Even my buddy whos totally against bike lanes doesnt understand why we have it on streets like queen
I agree with with you. I think 100% of street with streetcars should have no on street parking. For one, just look at what happened this winter with streetcars being blocked by parked cars.

I do think in front of the hospitals on University it makes sense to have some parking and loading zones. Though if removing the parking is the only way to keep bike lanes in university, I am all for it. People can be dropped off on Murray Street.

Of course the province needs to pay for any construction.

Speaking of University, had anyone actually complained about the bike lanes there? Like some Bloor West businesses have been making a lot of noise, filing a lawsuit, etc. I've seen some people complain on-line about the bike lanes on Yonge. In both of those situations car lanes are reduce to one through lane in each direction, and I can kind of get the complaining from people who drive. But University is still two lanes at least in each direction. I have driven on it since the new bike lanes and never felt slowed down by them.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of University, had anyone actually complained about the bike lanes there? Like some Bloor West businesses have been making a lot of noise, filing a lawsuit, etc. I've seen some people complain on-line about the bike lanes on Yonge. In both of those situations car lanes are reduce to one through lane in each direction, and I can kind of get the complaining from people who drive. But University is still two lanes at least in each direction. I have driven on it since the new bike lanes and never felt slowed down by them.
Flavio Volpe constantly complains about them.
 
Flavio Volpe constantly complains about them.
I had to look up who this is. Google says he is "internationally recognized champion of Canada's automotive industry". He is the president of Canada's Automotive Parts Manufacturing Association. Sounds like he has may have a vested interest in people driving instead of cycling lmao.
 
While I agree with the general thrust above about removing street parking.........

I would point out.........loading zones really are necessary, particularly where a rear-laneway system is absent, but even otherwise for everything from movers to dropping off those with mobility challenges.

While such zones need not be in every block, they do likely prevent replacing a parking lane with a full additional free-flowing lane for vehicles in both directions.
 
peaking of University, had anyone actually complained about the bike lanes there? Like some Bloor West businesses have been making a lot of noise, filing a lawsuit, etc. I've seen some people complain on-line about the bike lanes on Yonge. In both of those situations car lanes are reduce to one through lane in each direction, and I can kind of get the complaining from people who drive. But University is still two lanes at least in each direction. I have driven on it since the new bike lanes and never felt slowed down by them.

I know someone who claims that the bike lanes on University have caused surgeries to be cancelled.

My head hurt after hearing that.
 
While I agree with the general thrust above about removing street parking.........

I would point out.........loading zones really are necessary, particularly where a rear-laneway system is absent, but even otherwise for everything from movers to dropping off those with mobility challenges.

While such zones need not be in every block, they do likely prevent replacing a parking lane with a full additional free-flowing lane for vehicles in both directions.
Does anyone know how loading zones, mobility challenges, etc are handled in places where the street is pedestrianized such as parts of St. Catherine in Montréal?
 
Does anyone know how loading zones, mobility challenges, etc are handled in places where the street is pedestrianized such as parts of St. Catherine in Montréal?

On behalf of 'anyone'......... LOL, yes.

1) The street is not fully pedestrianized, there is at least one through lane on most blocks. There is a loading zone (15m time limit) between Mansfield and Peel.

2) Here's a pic of one section:

1744272362577.png


Three, that's not my pic...........but you can find the source info for it and see more pics, where I first posted it, over in the Yonge St. revitalization thread:


Or pop over to the source directly for even more pics:


From the above, you can also see a schematic diagram showing the loading zone (pink) and through lanes for cars (arrows)

1744272591963.png
 
I had to look up who this is. Google says he is "internationally recognized champion of Canada's automotive industry". He is the president of Canada's Automotive Parts Manufacturing Association. Sounds like he has may have a vested interest in people driving instead of cycling lmao.

Volpe is the son of long-time Liberal MP Joe Volpe. He’s especially outspoken on bike lanes and pro-Israel issues for some reason.

He shouldn’t have the platform he has when talking about anything else other than the auto parts industry.
 
He seems to have no actual hobbies, so what he does instead is take a picture of University Ave every time he comes downtown and post it on twitter with a whinge about bike lanes, even when the picture shows traffic flowing freely. Obviously in his position he has direct financial interest in encouraging people to drive and buy cars rather than to bike.
 
He seems to have no actual hobbies, so what he does instead is take a picture of University Ave every time he comes downtown and post it on twitter with a whinge about bike lanes, even when the picture shows traffic flowing freely. Obviously in his position he has direct financial interest in encouraging people to drive and buy cars rather than to bike.
I don't know about direct financial interest. Bike lanes on University or Toronto in general would basically have nil impact on general automotive sales.

He probably is just harbouring a pro-car bias.
 

Back
Top