Towered
Superstar
Bikes lanes on Kipling from top to bottom?? None of the idiotic councilors in Etobicoke will ever allow that...
So what exactly did City Council decide to do for bike lanes in the council meeting last week?
The article below is from London, UK. What an example for our city. Aggressive plans to expand/improve cycling and walking space with a modeled impact of 10x more cycling and 5x more walking in London!
Mayor’s Streetspace Plan could see cycling increased tenfold post-lockdown | BikeBiz
As the UK lockdown heads into its second phase, Mayor of London's walking and cycling…www.bikebiz.com
Toronto is obviously the latter. We barely build protected bike lanes, We barely expand pedestrian space, we slowly build transit. And we encourage driving. We're slow, and we're not taking any risks to public infrastructure. We put cars first in infrastructure projects, that's the problem. We'll only see change with fresh minds and bold ideas.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Tory can't remove road lanes and parking because then he couldn't go anywhere.I've been cycling more often since the start of the pandemic for transportation and exercise as the gyms are closed. It has reminded me of how little progress has been made on transportation-oriented pedestrian and cycling infrastructure under both the Ford and Tory administrations. Tory's government has even struggled with removing lanes of traffic to expand downtown sidewalks for social distancing, which is a no-brainer when there's next to no traffic nowadays.
It’s the police cars parked in bike lanes for non-emergency (no lights flashing) stops that make me the most annoyed. We can’t expect Joe Public to adhere to the rules if those who enforce them don’t.I was being sarcastic, given the number of people who park cars in bike lanes.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Tory can't remove road lanes and parking because then he couldn't go anywhere.
He takes the subway to work. I see him on it sometimes.
Yeah, to me, Tory's problem isn't as much that he's out of touch (though he is) as it is the particular brand of "leadership" that he has developed, which essentially seeks on every issue to locate two emerging poles of a debate and to swim right up the middle. The key problem with this is it relies entirely on the establishment of those two extremes, regardless of where they sit on the "good public policy" spectrum.
So if the established pole at one end is the Toronto Sun editorial board (as it quite often is), then the apparent centre of the debate has been automatically pulled to some combination of the right, and/or crazy, and/or harmful, and the newly emerged "middle ground" represents bad policy, half measures, or both.