Ontnut
Active Member
I did not say that I want to increase fees for security, but that I would not be opposed to a small increase if that means permanent security at the entrances all times. Of course, there's only 2 ways to get something extra, pay for it, or cut something else. I think the best way to find the funds at this point would be to go through the budget and re-organize/fund certain items. This will be difficult however, in the first year, because we really have very little idea what parts of the budget are over or underfunded.
Also, keeping maintenance fees as low as possible is nice, until a certain point. Every building needs a bare minimum budget to run, and a minimum budget to run so that desires and needs are met. Sure maybe a group of owners think we can squeeze by with the bare minimum of security at the lowest price, since that will save us money; but perhaps that's short sighted in that if something were to happen, such as a robbery or vandalism etc., that could have been prevented by having just 1 or 2 extra guards watching the main doors, we might end up having to deal with more serious issues than just maintenance fees. Of course there is no guarantee that this would happen, or that more security would prevent it, but it's something to think about. Would you be comfortable if your only child or daughter was living alone in a building for which security is decidedly lax? Just something to think about so that it can be discussed at the turnover meeting. I'd be more than happy to have to only pay 2 guards, if they can do an adequate job on their own, but this remains to be seen.
Also, there must be dozens upon dozens of cameras in the building, and the screen they watch it on isn't exactly wall-to-wall, so even small issues like people smoking in stairwells, become a big issue for 2 people to handle (as I've seen them struggle to ID, find and confront certain people who were suspected of smoking inside)...not to mention a lot of the time it seems as though the gate security could care less about actually doing their job - there's one asian guy in particular that always seems to be staring off into space.
Finally, keep in mind that there are ongoing sales of units, for which security guards must bring up potential buyers and stay with them the entire time they are there. That means whenever someone is viewing a unit, there is no guard on patrol and no guard at either main entrance. Just seems to be spread kinda thin imo.
Also, keeping maintenance fees as low as possible is nice, until a certain point. Every building needs a bare minimum budget to run, and a minimum budget to run so that desires and needs are met. Sure maybe a group of owners think we can squeeze by with the bare minimum of security at the lowest price, since that will save us money; but perhaps that's short sighted in that if something were to happen, such as a robbery or vandalism etc., that could have been prevented by having just 1 or 2 extra guards watching the main doors, we might end up having to deal with more serious issues than just maintenance fees. Of course there is no guarantee that this would happen, or that more security would prevent it, but it's something to think about. Would you be comfortable if your only child or daughter was living alone in a building for which security is decidedly lax? Just something to think about so that it can be discussed at the turnover meeting. I'd be more than happy to have to only pay 2 guards, if they can do an adequate job on their own, but this remains to be seen.
Also, there must be dozens upon dozens of cameras in the building, and the screen they watch it on isn't exactly wall-to-wall, so even small issues like people smoking in stairwells, become a big issue for 2 people to handle (as I've seen them struggle to ID, find and confront certain people who were suspected of smoking inside)...not to mention a lot of the time it seems as though the gate security could care less about actually doing their job - there's one asian guy in particular that always seems to be staring off into space.
Finally, keep in mind that there are ongoing sales of units, for which security guards must bring up potential buyers and stay with them the entire time they are there. That means whenever someone is viewing a unit, there is no guard on patrol and no guard at either main entrance. Just seems to be spread kinda thin imo.
Raising fees for security?? Bad idea...few reasons:
1. Fees are already going to go up as they always do in the first year.
2. Maintenance fees are already high. We don't need to add on. We need to incorporate and see what our fees are going towards right now and adjust accordingly. We don't want to go and spend and add on Maintenance fees right off the bat. If that is your mentality, applying for the Board is a bad idea. You want to keep maint. fees as low as possible.
As for security, everyone will have different opinions on this one...in the end, the guys in the gatehouse are there to watch all cameras and monitor parking. We have 2 right now, one to do that and one to patrol. That is good enough. We have cameras everywhere in the building. I don't think we need anymore guards, but as we can clearly see, this is debatable.
One thing I will agree on, the management in this building is not the greatest and something needs to be done about it once Board is created.