Admiral Beez
Superstar
Man alive our guys look like hosers compared to the Brits. And what's with the ball caps? A beret looks so much sharper, IMO.
Man alive our guys look like hosers compared to the Brits. And what's with the ball caps? A beret looks so much sharper, IMO.
I understand the recent General Order tightens up some of dress and deportment rules. I understand one of the problems with the original orders was the vagueness that gave licence to those who chose to take it also lacked direction for supervisory/command oversight.You'll find disagreement on the grooming rules. You won't find disagreement on ball caps. My RCAF ball cap wasn't issued. Had to buy it. Much prefer it over my beret. Comfort and sun protection. Also operational clothing is not about appearance. It's about comfort and functionality. The berets, wedges and peak caps are for office wear and parades.
On the grooming standards, as usual few folks took it too far. Most dudes just reduced the frequency of shaving or they grew well kept beards. Most women used less hair gel and maybe got some untraditional highlights. But some folks decided it was okay to roll into work looking like hobos. And that's where the dissatisfaction comes from. The pendulum is starting to swing back. We'll end up in the middle I'm sure.
I understand one of the problems with the original orders was the vagueness that gave licence to those who chose to take it also lacked direction for supervisory/command oversight.
One of the funniest things I heard was the the original order being dubbed 'HoboForGen'.
Not sure that removing 'external military presence' is going to be all that appealing to Europe when their biggest rivals are Russia and China.
This is broadly the BRICS narrative. Each country wants the US out of what they consider the sphere of influence that they believe they are entitled to. The Chinese want to be able to boss around the Japanese, the Koreans, the Filipinos, the Indonesians, the Vietnamese, etc. I'd mention the Taiwanese but that's not even a question of boss around. The same worldview applies to Brazil, India, Russia and South Africa and how they see their neighbours. For Canada this has big implications given Russian revanchist views on NATO territory. I'd say we're worried about Chinese views on the Indo-Pacific. But the juries out on whether we actually care beyond tokenism.
Not sure that removing 'external military presence' is going to be all that appealing to Europe when their biggest rivals are Russia and China.
We should care more about Russia - nevermind their ambitions in Europe but their designs on the polar region (including territorial claims), which will directly affect us.
AoD
It'll be embarrassing to see us get chastized publicly yet again about our meagre defence spending on our own soilThis is going to be spicy:
Canada to host the 70th annual NATO session in Montreal
Canada will host the 70th annual session of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Parliamentary Assembly from Nov. 22 to 25 in Montreal, Que.www.ctvnews.ca
It'll be embarrassing to see us get chastized publicly yet again about our meagre defence spending on our own soil