HelloToday
Active Member
100 units for lease at 101 Peter. Wow.
Wow .... but also, lol.
100 units for lease at 101 Peter. Wow.
Only a month after predicting that home prices in the region would be stable in 2015, the Calgary Real Estate Board admitted that low oil prices and fears over the fate of the region’s fragile economy have hammered consumer confidence. Home sales plunged 35 per cent in January to their lowest levels in more than seven years while new listings shot up 40 per cent.
http://www.torontocondoteam.ca/peterstreetcondos
Link to a website extolling virtues of Peter Street condos.
Thanks.
I thought it might be this project but they referred to 100 Peter Street.
Does anyone know if it has just been registered or just allowed to come onto the MLS
What would be interesting is to see how fast the 100 condos get absorbed.
My bad... I see it was 101 Peter Street.
Sorry...misread it guys.
Migos,
most people do not look to move in February, especially when there is a foot of snow on the ground.
I would like to see how fast these buildings rent and what is left say after May 1.
I don't know that Calgary will significantly affect Toronto, at least in the short term.
Oil has always been a boom/bust for Calgary. Oil prices will definitely affect it and if they stay low for 6 months or a year, I do believe homes, high priced ones especially and new condos will really hurt. I belive and perhaps may be corrected but Calgary and Alberta have had busts before without it affecting Toronto or Vancouver.
As all those people leave the oil projects and the migration goes from West back to East (at least that is what I am expecting), that may well put some support under the Toronto market at least in the short term.
Feb is typically a very slow month in real estate. Many agents go on vacation during that month. Things pick back up in March/April.
Calgary's market is nothing like Toronto's. Migos, you're trying too hard.
So where are these listings coming from if agents are on vacation? Obviously it's a slow time for people to rent places out, I'm just pointing out the glut of supply coming online. Also, people moving in spring means they'll be leaving their existing household. A new condo being "absorbed" doesn't necessarily remove supply. Household formation does, which isn't necessarily as seasonal as moving.
I'm just posting my opinion like everybody in this thread. Take it or leave it.
I think it would be interesting to see what the numbers are for condos on the MLS and the absorption rate compared to the same time last year. Don't know if someone could provide this for the Toronto core. I do suspect you are correct Migos that there will be more competition this Spring for renters. If so, maybe we will see price competition or at least that some of the less well laid out units will linger. Better layouts in better locations I suspect will still rent.
I am currently renting out a 1+1 unit at 21 Nelson and once we move into a pre-con townhouse in Leslieville we will likely be renting out our current 1+1 unit at 8 Charlotte. Is this the right financial strategy though? E.g. Rent them out or sell them? What worries me is the number of units that have just hit or will be hitting the market very shortly. Between the two properties there are literally thousands of units that are now or will be taking occupancy (studio, bond, pinnacle, cinema, peter St, king charlotte, etc.) and this worries me from both a rent them out or even sell them perspective.
So, is it best to hold on to them or should we perhaps look into selling in early 2016? Two years ago it took me less than 24 hours to find a tenant for my furnished 1+1 unit at 21 Nelson. Now, it took just over two months with zero increase to the rent. I can already feel with all the units out there available, that it's harder to find tenants...
Per MLS:
295 Adelaide: 64 units
224 King: 39 units
12 York: 34 units
29 Queens Quay: 47 units
Wow at 295 Adelaide, people do not like living there. 12 York is eating inventory up nicely. 29 Queens Quay E has such a long long way to go to completion. Same to 224 King.
I just went on MLS and it suggests 32 for rent at 295 Adelaide.
Is there a reason you think people don't like living there even allowing that there are 32 and not 64 for rent?
There are 31 for sale at 21 Widemer.
Do you think it is the price point or the building.
I have not been in either so don't know.
Is it just that 295 is just registering or completing now perhaps?
this is anecdotal but here was a post from one of our members:
So, is it best to hold on to them or should we perhaps look into selling in early 2016? Two years ago it took me less than 24 hours to find a tenant for my furnished 1+1 unit at 21 Nelson. Now, it took just over two months with zero increase to the rent. I can already feel with all the units out there available, that it's harder to find tenants...
Related to this post: Fiurnished rentals are a different breed. They can rent out quickly but they are definitely more difficult as a rule to rent out than unfurnished. What has happened I believe if I look at the market is that the premium for furnished has come down quite a bit in the past 2 years over unfurnished. May perhaps explain why Aiekon had a longer wait.
1 day was very fast. I don't think over 2 months is particularly long since 1 month is the norm. Maybe we are just seeing law of averages at play here. One time fast rent, one time slightly slower. But he may be right that there is more product now to chose from and maybe we are reaching saturation.
Should be interesting to see if we start seeing differentiation between buildings close by each other and what is contributing to the differentiation...layout, price point, view etc.