interested
Senior Member
i have an old price list from Radio City when they first came onto the market in 2000.
i use it as reference b/c it's a modern design by aA in the d/t core built by Context.
the pre-construction price was ~$250 PSF not including parking or locker.
so if prices increased at inflation+ over 10 years, that should put it @ $375 PSF.
on MLS they are currently asking ~$500 PSF.
CDR: Thank you for this. It is always good to apply real figures to a real project as then one can see what happens.
I would add that one should allow for slightly more than $375/sq. ft just because new projects vs. 10 year old ones should have less maintenance at least initially though I realize there is a "reserve fund". Also, people simply "like new".
I think it is interesting that you came up with $375 and in fact last quarter in the City of Toronto I believe I read in one of the articles resale was $369 average.
I would allow $400-425/sq. ft for new product and since we have HST now (over $400K) even up to say $450/sq. ft. This is still much lower than the $550-700/sq. ft mid to upper mid range products which we currently have for alot of new projects. That said, I am still not saying prices will come down fully to this extent.
It will, in my view, depend on what proportion are long term investors (well capitalized) and end users (well capitalized end users) vs. how many are in a weaker position as end users/investors(less well capitalized)/ and how risky the "specuvestors" have become. If the latter group forms say more than 20-25% of the market, then there will be a significant downturn as this group unloads and in the process by driving prices down brings along with it other investors who previously had 20-30% equity to now levels of say 5-15% and they get carried along in untenable situations when renewing their mortgage if/when interest rates rise and given the new mortgage rules or if there are life circumstance changes.
I believe as previous posted by others on the forum "that the market will likely overshoot on the down side" just as it has done in my view on the rise up, especially the last rise since 2008.
Despite my most recent posts all arguing for this, I still do not consider myself in the doom/gloom camp and 15% reductions will cause mainly problems for those entering the past 2 or 3 years who were "late to the party as it were". I think even those who bought in 2007, possibly in 2008 will be OK but as I have posted previously, I am simply not that smart to know. I generally feel I can spot trends in certain things but I have felt that this market was fully priced in 2007 and have watched frankly bewildered at just how it has come even further up since then.
Last edited: