Urban Shocker
Doyenne
Checked yesterday - the painting's perspective is from the bridge's first bay. Perhaps Kurelek stood on the wall when he took the reference photographs.
Checked yesterday - the painting's perspective is from the bridge's first bay. Perhaps Kurelek stood on the wall when he took the reference photographs.
Alas, no - you'll have to go to the AGO ... unless you have a copy of KURELEK'S VISION OF CANADA by the artist and Joan Murray, which I took along yesterday. He was quite true to his reference photographs, though I think he cheated a bit on the route of the DVP as it disappears to the south. He shows fewer trees in the valley and on the western slopes than there are now. The painting's also a record of construction, since it shows a few unfinished apartment buildings.
He chronicled the city in art. It would be interesting to add to the Then and Now thread, comparing his paintings of such places as The Beach and High Park with their current appearance.
There was a nice Vello Hubel sketch ( was he still teaching at OCA when you were there? ) at the Sunday antique market a few weeks ago. I glanced at it, but it had sold when I returned ten minutes later. This, I think, is it:
http://ve.tpl.toronto.on.ca/TPM/970-3-6c.html
Perhaps it was that one - I only took a quick look.
Maybe Keifer will turn his hand to set design - I'd love to see what he could do with Aida or theRing.