Paleo
Active Member
Yes, they certainly can leapfrog. But leapfrogging sort of implies a single route and that's not really what I meant, so I guess I chose the wrong word. I was trying to say that because they're buses and not restricted to a dedicated pair of rails, there is no reason why one vehicle has to impede all the others in behind - they can manouvre around as needed, which is clearly demonstrated in the pics and video from Guangzhou where multiple routes come to overlap in the same corridor/station.
Unless you can guarantee rapid movement and very little bloackage time, like say a subway, BRT has to be weighed as a legitimate alternative to LRT.
I'm not advocating anything other than considering all options rather than focus on just one way of thinking. That station simply wouldn't be possible of those buses were trams riding in sequence on a pair rails - the ability of the buses being able to move around each other is the only reason it works at all.
Considering the bellyaching here over the possible loss of turning lanes with just the addition of two LRT lanes, good luck with those four lane stations.
I am sure it would be considered even more legitimate.