News   Feb 26, 2026
 69     1 
News   Feb 26, 2026
 241     0 
News   Feb 26, 2026
 477     0 

2006 Census

R

rdaner

Guest
This should be interesting.

Census results out this week

GREGORY BONNELL

Canadian Press

TORONTO — Devising fresh ways to paint Canada's national portrait after 340 years of census taking can tax even the most creative of minds.

Still, Statistics Canada managed to mark at least two firsts with the 2006 census, the results of which begin to roll out Tuesday.

Jean Talon, the first Intendant of New France, no doubt wore out a pair of boots as he personally collected data from the colony's 3,215 inhabitants in 1666.

Fast forward to 2006 and the information superhighway, instead of a dirt road winding alongside the St. Lawrence River, was offered up for the first time as a means for Canadians to file their personal data.

Another debut was the option to keep one's personally identifiable information under wraps beyond the 92-year release period, a source of discontent for historians and genealogists who rely on such material to tell Canada's story.

On Tuesday, the first major release from last May's census will reveal not only how many of us there are in Canada, but also where and how we're living.

One trend Canadians can expect to see documented is the continued explosive growth of auto-dependent suburbs, despite poll after poll suggesting the environment is top of mind for Canadians.

The precision of census data allows analysts to pinpoint numerous cultural idiosyncrasies, including how many people commute to urban centres from any one community.

“The census is beautiful in a sense,†said Anil Arora, director general of the census program branch at Statistics Canada. “It can go down to a very, very fine level of geography and tell you what's happening. . . nothing else comes to that degree of granularity or accuracy.â€

Those granules are scrutinized by all levels of government to make policy decisions, big and small.

Population counts dictate how some $62-billion is transferred from federal coffers to the provinces and territories. The numbers also determine where a community places that new bus stop.

And it's more than just government that pays attention.

Opening a shop in a community with lots of young families? You might want to stock the shelves with spill-proof cups and diaper wipes. Conversely, pharmacists surrounded by octogenarians might want lots of Bengay on hand.

“Those (decisions) are all based on census counts,†said Mr. Arora.

The census is also a gold mine for historians and genealogists anxious to look beyond the faceless numbers and use everyday people to help tell Canada's story.

“It allows us to put a human face on our historical story, in a sense that we can actually look at these individuals and learn more about our past,†said Bill Waiser, a history professor at the University of Saskatchewan. “These are the building blocks of Canadian history, census material.â€

While personally identifiable material becomes public 92 years after it's collected, the 2006 census allowed Canadians, for the first time, to keep the information collected last year from being released in 2098.

“Even if five per cent don't participate in it, this gem of historical treasure that we've had up to now will be compromised,†said Mr. Waiser. “There will be people missing from (the Canadian) story and that's unfortunate.â€

Just how many Canadians said yes or no to releasing that information in 92 years will revealed on Tuesday.

“It will be very interesting to see what the results are,†said Mr. Waiser. “Because of what happened in Western Canada with some of the controversy over the census collecting. It's going to be interesting whether that had an effect on this question.â€

The controversy stemmed from media reports that cited 67-year-old enumerator Sharon Newton as saying managers desperate to complete the census told data collectors to make up names for those people they couldn't contact.

“Maybe 10 (homes were done that way). . . it wasn't totally just bogus. I asked neighbours,†Ms. Newton said when reached at her Chilliwack, B.C., home. “They were getting the population count but they didn't have the right names.â€

Ms. Newton said her real beef with Statistics Canada was with their payment system, which she said left her waiting months to receive full payment for her work.

Mr. Arora, who said the agency continues to look into Ms. Newton's complaint, concedes there were serious difficulties finding enough enumerators in Western Canada's “red hot†economy. The staffing issues saw Statistics Canada extend the collection period by about five weeks to “ensure that our data quality did not suffer.â€

“All of our indications are that data quality is as good as our censuses in the past. We know our strategy worked,†said Mr. Arora.

The one in five households that submitted the census online cut some of the costs associated with traditional mail service, giving Statistics Canada the flexibility to add extra collection time without going over budget, Mr. Arora added.

The 2.26 million households that used the online service represent a “strong take up by Canadians,†said Mr. Arora.

“That's more than double of any other country that's ever done that before.â€

Some 12.7 million households received census forms between May 1 and May 13 last year. Eighty per cent of respondents filled out the short, eight-question form. The long form contained 53 additional questions.

Results will be announced by Statistics Canada in a series of releases over the next 15 months.
 
And I thought Jean Talon was just a market in Montreal. :b
 
I love the census. I always hope to get the long form. Why do I never get the long form? I'd be so good at it. Why does Census Canada keep spurning my advances? Please, in 2011, let it be me.
 
FROM SSP:

2006censuscmacountszb1.jpg
 
Here's some new population figures and growth % since 2001:

Ontario 12,160,282 6.6

GTA: 5,555,912

Toronto 2,503,281 +0.9

Peel 1,159,405 +17.2
Mississauga 668,549 +9.1
Brampton 433,806 +33.3
Caledon 57,050 +12.7

York 892,712 +22.4
Markham 261,573 +25.4
City Above the Law: 238,866 +31.2
Richmond Hill: 162,704 +23.2
Newmarket: 74,295 +12.9
Aurora: 47,629 +18.6

Durham 561,258 +10.7
Oshawa 141,590 +1.8
Whitby 111,184 +27.2
Ajax: 90,167 +22.3
Pickering: 87,838 +0.8
Clarington: 77,820 +11.4

Halton 439,256 +17.1
Oakville 165,613 +14.4
Burlington 164,415 +9.0
Halton Hills 55,289 +14.7
Milton 53,939 +71.4 (!)

Other GTA Area:
Hamilton: 504,559 +2.1
Waterloo Region 478,121 +9.0
Guelph 114,943 +8.3
Barrie: 128,430 +23.8
St. Catharines 131,989 +2.2
Niagara Falls: 82,184 +4.3
Brantford 90,192 +4.4
Peterborough 74,898 +4.8

City of Ottawa 812,129 +4.9
CMA 1,130,761 +5.9
 
Most populous municipalities of Canada in 2006
Source: Statistics Canada, Census of population, 2006

1. Toronto ON 2,503,281
2. Montréal QC 1,620,693
3. Calgary AB 988,193
4. Ottawa ON 812,129
5. Edmonton AB 730,372
6. Mississauga ON 668,549
7. Winnipeg MB 633,451
8. Vancouver BC 578,041
9. Hamilton ON 504,559
10. Québec QC 491,142
11. Brampton ON 433,806
12. Surrey BC 394,976
13. Halifax NS 372,679
14. Laval QC 368,709
15. London ON 352,395
16. Markham ON 261,573
17. Gatineau QC 242,124
18. Vaughan ON 238,866
19. Longueuil QC 229,330
20. Windsor ON 216,473
21. Kitchener ON 204,668
22. Burnaby BC 202,799
23. Saskatoon SK 202,340
24. Regina SK 179,246
25. Richmond BC 174,461
 
Just found out that they won't be releasing all the age data until July and VisMin/Ethnocultural stuff until next year; which means I won't be able to use it at work until then. GRR!!

I agree. I am really interested in the change in this data since 2001, and am eager to work with it. I am tired of using 2001 data. But Boggy might have a problem with you and I working with VizMin data though - it's offensive, you know.

I was a bit surprised to see Pickering and Oshawa's growth so slow - almost non-existent.

With Halton Hills and Caledon now with more than 50,000 each, it is inexcusable that these are the only two municipalities in the GTA without public transit (GO doesn't count). Even Scugog has a dial-a-ride through Durham Region Transit now. Even Orangeville has a bus system.

74.1 percent growth in 5 years in Milton? That's friggin insane! No wonder Wonderboy wanted out!
 
That's a big surprise too. I moved from the second fastest growing city on that list to Toronto. Shouldn't that count for something?

I wonder if there are errors here - though most numbers look right - even Milton's. How are we supposed to accommodate 1,000,000 people if we can't muster 25,000? Maybe it's a demographic shift going on right now.
 
So what do you think accounts for Toronto not really growing (and certainly not growing in relation to the area).

Is the city too expensive to buy in?
Are older homes emptying out of young people (who are moving to the 'burbs)?
Are immigrants flocking to areas outside the city?
 
Gentrification - smaller families, larger spaces occupied by fewer people, etc. Aging population and the forementioned generational change.

What would be really interesting to look at would be the household size data. My gut feeling tells me that it's the inner suburbs that is losing population in a big way...

AoD
 
Just found out that they won't be releasing all the age data until July and VisMin/Ethnocultural stuff until next year; which means I won't be able to use it at work until then. GRR!!

AoD
 
This is why I can't wait for CT-level data to become available. I bet you're right, Alvin, and I bet it's York, East York and even Etobicoke that are losing population as Toronto, North York and Scarborough grow. (It is fustrating that Statscan does not have the breakdowns for the dissolved cities for the 2006 Census, otherwise I could more easily test this theory).
 
Whoa, only 1% growth for the City of Toronto? In the previous 5 year period, it had 4% growth. Only 20k in 5 years is crazy low.

With all the new development, I expected growth in the city to be more than usual, like 5 or 6 per cent since the last census, and in fact, unofficial estimates have been along the same lines, estimating the population at around 2.6 million last year.

What happened?
 
Toronto's growth rate lagging behind the nation
Canadian Press

OTTAWA — The numbers are in and new information from the 2006 census shows Toronto has not kept pace with Canada's national growth rate over the last five years.

Statistics Canada released the first data from last year's census on Tuesday and it showed the population of Toronto has increased by 0.9 per cent since the 2001 census.

During the same five-year time period, Canada's national population increased 5.4 per cent, while the population of Ontario increased by 6.6 per cent.

When the census was taken in May 2006 the population of Toronto was 2,503,281 compared with 2,481,494 in 2001.

The census indicates booming Alberta had the highest growth rate among all provinces; its 10.6 per cent population gain attributed mostly to the influx of people from other parts of Canada who have gone there to work in the oil business.

Other provinces that experienced growth were Ontario (6.6 per cent), British Columbia (5.3 per cent), Quebec (4.3 per cent), Manitoba (2.6 per cent), Nova Scotia (0.6 per cent), Prince Edward Island (0.4 per cent) and New Brunswick (0.1 per cent).

The new census data shows the provinces that experienced loss in population were Newfoundland and Labrador (-1.5 per cent) and Saskatchewan (-1.1 per cent).

In the North, all three territories experienced growth higher than the national average from 2001-06.

Nunavut's population grew 10.2 per cent and the Yukon increased 5.9 per cent. The population of the Northwest Territories increased 11.0 per cent, but Statistics Canada cautioned that the actual growth rate may not be that high. It said the increase is likely the result of an "undercount" of N.W.T. inhabitants in 2001.

Canada's population as of census day 2006 was 31,612,897, Statistics Canada reported.

Ontario remains the most populous Canadian province or territory, with a population of 12,160,282. The population of other provinces and territories: Quebec, 7,546,131; British Columbia, 4,113,487; Alberta, 3,290,350; Manitoba, 1,148,401; Saskatchewan, 968,157; Nova Scotia, 913,462; New Brunswick, 729,997; Newfoundland and Labrador, 505,469; Prince Edward Island, 135,851; Northwest Territories, 41,464; Yukon Territory, 30,372 and Nunavut, 29,474.

The census is conducted every five years by Statistics Canada and is based on information filled out by Canadians on census day on May 16, 2006.

The information released Tuesday is the first in a series of census data that will be released periodically over the next 15 months. Future data will give demographic breakdowns on dozens of topics, including age, sex, marital status, language, ethnic origin, education and income.
 
That article is really quite misleading. It's almost senseless to talk about how the City of Toronto is lagging behind when the Toronto CMA as a whole had a growth rate of 10%.

AoD
 

Back
Top