News   May 03, 2024
 1K     1 
News   May 03, 2024
 639     0 
News   May 03, 2024
 304     0 

$161-million CSL 'error' puts Martin on hot seat

A

Are Be

Guest
$161-million CSL 'error' puts Martin on hot seat

By CAMPBELL CLARK
From Thursday's Globe and Mail

POSTED AT 5:13 AM EST &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp Thursday, Jan. 29, 2004

Advertisement

Ottawa — Prime Minister Paul Martin's shipping empire had business dealings with Ottawa that were a thousand times more vast than the Liberal government previously admitted, totalling $161-million over the past 11 years, newly released records show.

Although the government reported to Parliament a year ago that companies Mr. Martin owned did only $137,000 worth of federal business in the past decade, they admitted yesterday that the real amount was far more, including $46-million in contracts issued when Mr. Martin was finance minister.

The huge disparity prompted opposition politicians to raise suspicions of a cover-up. But Mr. Martin insisted that it was a mistake -- one minister said it was due to "administrative errors" -- and that he was unaware of it for months.

He said he was "appalled" when he heard of it, and demanded it be corrected.

"I was not in government at the time that question was answered, and in fact did not really know about the answer until later, when further facts came out," he said at a press conference. "As soon as I saw that, I said I want a complete examination of all of this."

But the major business links between his family's companies -- Canada Steamship Lines, related companies, and subsidiaries -- also renewed questions about potential conflicts of interest now that he is Prime Minister.

Conservative MP James Rajotte said he is skeptical of the government's assertion that the false information that it originally provided was a simple mistake.

"It makes me suspicious," he said. "It's a very big administrative error, if it is an administrative error."

He said it is in the Liberal government's interest to minimize the extent to which Mr. Martin's family businesses earn their income from government contracts, because that heightens concern about possible conflicts of interest.

"The questions become a lot more serious when you have [millions] in contracts," he said.

He said Mr. Martin should have sold his interest in CSL before joining the cabinet in 1993, and he called for an independent review of CSL's government business.

However, Mr. Martin, who last year transferred to his sons control of CSL Group Inc., parent of Canada Steamship Lines and several other subsidiaries, suggested such a review is not necessary now that more information is out.

"Lookit, I'm out of the company. But as far as I'm concerned, my dealings are an open book. That document is without a doubt the best document in terms of that involvement that could be created," he said.

Over all, 12 companies in which Mr. Martin had a stake won 548 contracts for shipbuilding, ship repair, engineering and project management. The $161-million total over 11 years includes $10.3-million in grants and a $4.9-million government loan.

Mr. Martin noted his family's shipping firm, CSL Group Inc., and its subsidiaries have been doing business with Ottawa for decades.

But the figures suggest Mr. Martin's companies did less business with the government, not more, while he was finance minister.

CSL and its subsidiaries won $82.4-million in contracts in the first 10 months of 1993, while the Tories were in power -- mostly from one $69-million deal to build two destroyers -- and $33-million in the 15 months after he left Jean Chrétien's cabinet, when he was a backbench MP. That compares to $46-million in the nine years he was finance minister.

Mr. Rajotte originally posed a written question to the government about dealings between Mr. Martin's companies and the government in late 2002, placing the query on the Commons order paper.

In February of 2003, the Chrétien government replied that Mr. Martin's business interests received $137,000 in contracts or grants.

Last October, the Canadian Alliance found evidence of $15-million in contracts on government websites. Don Boudria, the government House leader under Mr. Chrétien, promised to provide a corrected answer. His successor, Jacques Saada, released that answer yesterday.

Mr. Saada chalked up the mistake to "administrative errors." Government insiders said that among other mistakes, officials in most departments thought the Public Works Department, which issues most contracts on behalf of government departments, would answer for them.

Of the contracts and grants issued while Mr. Martin was finance minister, $18.6-million went to Lansdowne Technologies, which specializes in managing technical projects for government agencies.

Canadian Shipbuilding and Engineering sold its stake in Lansdowne to company management last December, after the Alliance raised questions about the fact that the firm was not listed on Mr. Martin's declaration of his holdings.

CS&E president Alan Thoms said his firm decided a few years ago that the company was not part of its core activities and has been diminishing its stake.

He said that CS&E, which won $20-million in ship repair deals from the government while Mr. Martin was in cabinet, never received any benefit because Mr. Martin was finance minister. "It was a disadvantage," he said.



© 2004 Bell Globemedia Publishing Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 
Aislin.0130.jpg
 
Think of the outrage if Martin were not a Liberal!
This must be the fault of Mike Harris or George Bush, no doubt.
 
Squawk! Fiberals! Outrage if it wasn't a Liberal! Squawk!

For what it's worth, Martin's no better than any of the last few Prime Ministers when it comes to personal gain. And that includes Mulroney.
 
My one question: Is are be being paid to put up this endless propaganda for conservatives everywhere? Or is it just charity?
 
EAGER DUPT OF LIBERALS -- TORONTO STAR BACKS MARTIN!!!

Feb. 5, 2004. 01:00 AM
Editorial: Tories miss the boat


Prime Minister Paul Martin put his integrity on the line yesterday by asking Auditor-General Sheila Fraser to conduct a thorough investigation of the business relations between Ottawa and Canada Steamship Lines, the corporate empire his family owns.

That would appear to be the best way of finding out exactly how much business the federal government gave the company, and whether any of the government contracts showed signs of favouritism rather than meeting all the requisite tests of fair play.

Fraser is clearly the person best equipped to examine the issue, which the Conservatives have made a cause célèbre after the government badly botched a report that was supposed to identify all the business dealings between the Montreal-based company and the government over the last 10 years.

But on Tuesday, when Martin first made the suggestion that Fraser look into the matter, interim Conservative leader Grant Hill immediately rejected the proposal, contending that a referral to Fraser in effect "would be a great way for (Martin) to push this under the carpet."

Fraser could surely settle the matter in the next month or two, which would mean that Canadians would know all the facts before the election, expected in the late spring.

So why did Hill reject Martin's proposal for clearing the air?

If Martin stood ready to let Canadians know the truth, why would Hill object?

The only reason we can come up with that makes any sense at all is that the Conservatives have made the tawdry calculation that their mudslinging and innuendo would do more to damage Martin's reputation than the truth possibly could.

At issue is a fundamental question of ethics, to be sure. But by rebuffing Martin's offer to let the Auditor-General uncover the truth, the Conservatives have managed to make the issue their ethics, not the Prime Minister's.

› Get 50% off home delivery of the Toronto Star.
FAQs| Site Map| Privacy Policy| Webmaster| Subscribe| My Subscription
Home| GTA| Business| Waymoresports| A&E| Life
Legal Notice: Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from www.thestar.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. For information please contact us using our webmaster form. www.thestar.com online since 1996.
 

Back
Top