kotsy
Senior Member
They aren't.If Metrolinx is planning to reuse those TBM's for the Gerrard to DVP tunnel,
They aren't.If Metrolinx is planning to reuse those TBM's for the Gerrard to DVP tunnel,
Assuming tunnelling is the lion's share of work for building a new line, and seeing as tunnelling apparently just started now, the early 2030s opening date seems questionable.Summer 2028 for the tunnelling to reach Corktown (now Distillery District)? If Metrolinx is planning to reuse those TBM's for the Gerrard to DVP tunnel, overall tunnelling won't be done before 2030 for sure.
For clarity, are those 6 figure costs predicated on construction already starting or being completed for signage? If nothing has been made yet, the cost to change the not-yet-made sign should be next to nothing compared to half a million dollars.Pretty typical for any type of consultancy quotation, the formula goes like this:
(Number of changed drawings x billable hours per drawing) x (Jr Drafter rate + Sr Drafter rate + Engineer/Architect rate + Lead Engineer/Architect rate + Project Coordinator rate + Project Manager rate + Director rate)
Of course those are "asking" price, they will be haggled down.
Price tag for the name change:
- Corktown: $200,000
- Queen Spadina + King Bathurst: $170,000
- Riverside-Leslieville: unknown
- Other stations (indirect impact): $60,000
Please don't ask why the numbers don't add up. They are from each station designer's quotation.
Assuming tunnelling is the lion's share of work for building a new line, and seeing as tunnelling apparently just started now, the early 2030s opening date seems questionable.
Thanks. I was wondering how that Pape tunnel would be dealt with.Tunnelling is not the lion's share of the overall build of the new line. Station construction is equally as complex and time consuming. For reference, the Eglinton crosstown west extension finished tunnelling in June 2025 (project broke ground in March 2022), but with station construction just starting we're still only expecting completion by 2029 or 2030.
Station construction for the Ontario line has the added issue of having 35m deep stations in the downtown section which is much more difficult to build than the shallow Eglinton West stations. Also, space is not a concern for the Eglinton West stations vs downtown for the Ontario Line. The good thing for the Ontario Line is that we're already well on our way to build the stations for the line. The only hassle being that the TBMs will have to be dis-assembled and re-assembled when it reaches each of the already excavated stations further increasing the total tunnelling time.
Also, rest assured that according to my research, another 2 TBMs will be used to tunnel the Pape avenue portion of the line: Metrolinx press release
It is clear though, that the opening date for the OL will inevitably push back from the current 2031 date to at least 2033 or later, which is a shame. All of the money being thrown at this project and yet it will be both over budget and delayed.
Yeah, underground stations are probably even more complex to build (plus they still require tunnelling to allow them to be built), but above-ground stations shouldn't be more complex? How's the progress with the underground stations now?Tunnelling is not the lion's share of the overall build of the new line. Station construction is equally as complex and time consuming. For reference, the Eglinton crosstown west extension finished tunnelling in June 2025 (project broke ground in March 2022), but with station construction just starting we're still only expecting completion by 2029 or 2030.
Station construction for the Ontario line has the added issue of having 35m deep stations in the downtown section which is much more difficult to build than the shallow Eglinton West stations. Also, space is not a concern for the Eglinton West stations vs downtown for the Ontario Line. The good thing for the Ontario Line is that we're already well on our way to build the stations for the line. The only hassle being that the TBMs will have to be dis-assembled and re-assembled when it reaches each of the already excavated stations further increasing the total tunnelling time.
Also, rest assured that according to my research, another 2 TBMs will be used to tunnel the Pape avenue portion of the line: Metrolinx press release
It is clear though, that the opening date for the OL will inevitably push back from the current 2031 date to at least 2033 or later, which is a shame. All of the money being thrown at this project and yet it will be both over budget and delayed.
Yeah, underground stations are probably even more complex to build (plus they still require tunnelling to allow them to be built), but above-ground stations shouldn't be more complex? How's the progress with the underground stations now?
Doubt that's happening as long as Don Valley West, Don Valley East, and Don Valley North are all Liberal MPPs.Thanks. I was wondering how that Pape tunnel would be dealt with.
Given the construction won't be done until the early 2030's, Metrolinx needs to start planning now for the eventual northern extension to Line 4 at Don Mills.
Doubt that's happening as long as Don Valley West, Don Valley East, and Don Valley North are all Liberal MPPs.
With it opening in the early 2030's, construction - certainly the digging the wholes in the ground stage - should be finished well before opening.Thanks. I was wondering how that Pape tunnel would be dealt with.
Given the construction won't be done until the early 2030's, Metrolinx needs to start planning now for the eventual northern extension to Line 4 at Don Mills.
When do you predict the Ontario Line will open?With it opening in the early 2030's, construction - certainly the digging the wholes in the ground stage - should be finished well before opening.
I have no predictions. But I'd hope that by the end of 2030, there won't be big visible construction and cranes everywhere.When do you predict the Ontario Line will open?