News   Feb 20, 2026
 900     0 
News   Feb 20, 2026
 912     1 
News   Feb 20, 2026
 1.3K     2 

Finch West Line 6 LRT

Having drivers lead to flat spots on the wheels. I think the upsides of millions of people get to work on time outweighs a few hundred jobs.

Look at how hard it is to make schedules changes for the TTC or MX? You have to wait for a new board period to make any service improvements. The Skytrain is 1000x more consistent than any TTC service, especially on weekends or late hours.
Flat spots are not caused by having drivers, but are a byproduct of physics. They are caused when a vehicle's wheels stop turning while the vehicle is still in motion, often thanks to emergency braking or wheel lock up caused by inclement weather conditions. How can a computer from the 1980s possibly detect what the weather is and know whether it should adjust its driving style accordingly?

What kind of problem that prevented "millions" from getting to work was caused by drivers? As well, you bring this up now as being no problem, but when everyone and their dog prioritizes efficiency over the existence of jobs, pretty soon no one will be able to pay for anything, except for the rich whose jobs of course will not be affected by automation (in the best case scenario; in the worst case their continued financial existence will be sustained by all the corporate profits that should have gone to paid employees). I am quite happy to take a minor hit in efficiency to ensure that people still have jobs, since those are getting increasingly hard to come by in our AI obsessed world. Those who are promoting automation everywhere do not have the best interests of society at heart.
 
The Finch West lrt should have been built with stations that were grade separated at major intersections such as Albion, Kipling, Islington, Weston, Jane. The curve between Humber college station and Westmore should have been built with a more gentle curve allowing for faster speeds, plus removing stations at Stevenson, Duncanwoods, Driftwood to allow for better spacing. All those changes would probably allow the line to run smoother and feel more like a light metro. The whole line feels like it was designed without the end user in mind. Its a mess.
I am too lazy to rename the stations. I somehow think this is not the right approach for a transit line.
(borrowed from the Eglinton East thread).

1771549872994.png
 
If Line 7 is grade-separated—as it likely should be—it would have two major implications. First, the higher cost would make the project less likely to be built. Second, if Line 7 does proceed with full grade separation, it would strengthen the case for eventually rebuilding the non-grade-separated segments of Line 5.
 
If Line 7 is grade-separated—as it likely should be—it would have two major implications. First, the higher cost would make the project less likely to be built. Second, if Line 7 does proceed with full grade separation, it would strengthen the case for eventually rebuilding the non-grade-separated segments of Line 5
Off topic for this thread, but Line 5 can't be extended due to Line 2's extension being in the way. Doesn't matter if it's at grade or not.

I'm hoping that "Line 7" just turns into:
a) Sheppard Extension Phase 2 to Malvern along the protected SRT extension ROW
b) Upgraded BRT on the existing RapidTO Eglinton East corridor + the planned Durham Scarborough BRT between Scarborough Town Centre and UTSC
 
Even this dysfunctional city sees that non-grade separation *IS NOT* working, and they are actually listening to public sentiment.


Looks like the Eglinton East LRT, if it ever happens may not be at grade after all.
Thank god that Metrolinx rescued Eglinton West from the City.. who were pushing at-grade along there. Still think Metrolinx should have gone elevated there, not tunneled, but either is better than surface.
 
So waste public taxpayer dollars on staff when you don't need them
Arguably, our stations are currently understaffed.

If you are on a train and hit the alarm strip, how long can you expect a response? It won't be the driver, as they aren't supposed to leave the cab. And because stations have so few people working at them, you're more than likely waiting for the police to arrive at a station for just any kind of emergency.

But then you both don't want to spend on grade separation when it viably improves transit and has a strong public benefit. I don't get the hypocrisy.
When staffing costs get into 10 digit numbers, you might have a point. Let me know when that happens.

You know what else has a strong public safety benefit? More staff in stations.
 
If Line 7 is grade-separated—as it likely should be—it would have two major implications. First, the higher cost would make the project less likely to be built. Second, if Line 7 does proceed with full grade separation, it would strengthen the case for eventually rebuilding the non-grade-separated segments of Line 5.
That will NEVER happen.

The long suffering people along Eglinton have been put thru hell for the last 15 years and now that the line is finally finished, the very last thing they will tolerate is to start construction all over again. This is made exponentially worse by the fact that ML has a well deserved reputation of bringing in infrastructure projects way over budget and not even remotely close to the timetable they promise.

As ridership increases, they can add another car to the train but eventually, with 6 minute frequencies and a gutless wonder of a Mayor to implement full TSP, increase speed limits for the trains, and get rid of some stops, the line will simply not be able to cope with the number of riders. Due to this, they are going to have to eventually divide this line in 2.......one subway, one street running LRT akin to what the BD line and SRT was. Both trains will short-turn at the transfer point and head back to where they came. The subway section can run every 2 minutes and be automated while the street level section remains every 6 minutes or hopefully better.

They can make it relatively stress free by making the "transfer" station completely seamless by having 2 different platforms.......one for Eastbound and one for West. When you get off your one train you are literally 3 meters from the entrance to the other. People will initially be ticked off but eventually they will get use to it just as they do for other transfer points or as they did with the SRT.

If you lived along Eglinton or had a business there, would you tolerate going thru this horror story again?........I think not. It's not an ideal solution but, unfortunately, it's the only one.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top