News   Jan 06, 2026
 443     4 
News   Jan 06, 2026
 743     5 
News   Jan 06, 2026
 723     1 

Eglinton East LRT | Metrolinx

Could it possible to build the new LRT station one level up from the SRT tracks? Or baring that, perhaps build the station immediately west of the SRT platform and have it slope up through the SRT station until it clears the GO trains?

I'm not an engineer or architect by trade, and don't have the schematic drawings of Kennedy Station; that said, my instinct is that its a 'no'.

Lets start with option A above...

The structural columns that currently support the SRT level may or may not have sufficient load bearing capacity to handle another level on top of that, that would allow for trams/trains.

If not, then you would either require a new set of columns, or you would have to widen/reinforce the existing ones. In the context of the existing station, that's complicated, do-able, but both costly and would eat in to existing space in the bus terminal and the concourse, and may encounter other conflicts.

You also then need the stairs and escalators to reach the upper level, those too require supports and take up room on lower levels, you also need them to arrive at your newly created level at a reasonable grade in a usable location. That's a lot to ask.

****

option B, immediately west of the current tracks. Right, but you need to get up to grade to clear the GO Tracks over a fairly short distance. That would mean, likely, re-sloping the grade of the existing tracks through the station. That is also a structural issue. You would be adding load, and you might have to cut off/open the roof on the east side since the rails would now be higher, and you've have to prevent people from accessing the now former platforms in some way as well.
That part isn't hard.......... but back to the grade issue. It depends how much more vertical clearance we need. I'm not sure w/o the drawings how much more is required, the photo suggests a good 2M for sure, but it might be 3M or more.

If you do that, at a 3 degree incline, it will take you between 40M (2M meter rise) and 80M (4M rise)

Here's a calculator for that if you wan to play around:


Keep in mind you want the grade as low as possible, especially from to/from a stopped position. Depending on rolling stock selection, a grade of up to 5 degree incline may be workable, but a more conservative assumption would be prudent.

You don't want the platforms themselves to be inclined.
 
Completely on MX regarding the tunnel, that was another MX screwup, but I don't think there are the numbers for a separate extension. And again, I don't think the TTC likes mega long lines at all.
Ehh, there really was no other way to extend the subway, and remember, the plan was for the Scarborough LRT when the Eglinton LRT was starting construction. It was the city of Toronto that demanded a subway.
 
Truly the worst map i ever made, I don't know what i was thinking with those colours. Failed retro aesthetic i think?
Also this map just makes me think about how a network like this with BRT is so much more attainable with almost all of the same benefits, and then some. Inspiring me to update it with some better ideas.
 
Simpler may be better.
  1. Draw in the Ellesmere BRT - maybe move it up to Centennial College and then along Progress to a new Ellesmere GO station. That eliminates the need for 1 branch.
  2. Go through Malvern instead of along Sheppard. This eliminates another branch.
  3. Add a Gondola from Morningside to the Zoo. This eliminates another branch.
I will admit your colours are better than mine.

1767478912467.png
 

Back
Top