ProjectEnd
Superstar
Sign me up! (Toronto developers could never)
Sign me up! (Toronto developers could never)
If you think Kirkor could do the Hotel Zaandam, I don't know what you're smoking...
That's the pointI think hotel is unattractive and too busy.
Doubtless the skill to involved in utilizing that particular set of detail/cladding exceeds the design skill of KirKor, but that doesn't make it any less unappealing.
It's a jumble.
Tourist district Amsterdam.
They also have lots of 4 floor apartments with abundant parking that would have fit in fairly well in Regent Park 20 years ago. The roadway structure is what really differentiates the bulk of Amsterdam from mid-rise Toronto.
View attachment 557296
Is...that a real building, or photoshop??Sign me up! (Toronto developers could never)
While I like the trees and the scale in the above, I find the architecture rather sad, very dull colour palate and just mediocre quality, along with being a tad generic.
As real as it gets! https://www.google.com/maps/@52.438...E1ejIdjtC8WAe2oQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttuIs...that a real building, or photoshop??
Wow! As silly and ridiculous that it looks, I kind of love it and feel a bit weird for loving it. The overt whimsy is appealing!
But FUN architecture is "too expensive"!It's fantastic. The world needs way more 'fun' buildings. We have enough decorated sheds, let's start pumping out those ducks!
Hmm, we need an 'alas' emoji.But FUN architecture is "too expensive"!