pattycakes
Senior Member
Put the tinfoil away, for this makes absolute sense!
Well, Rob was rather well rehearsed, not like his usual self at all. Someone polished him up a bit, I think his collar and tie even looked decent for a change. Hmmm...
Put the tinfoil away, for this makes absolute sense!
By at one point being a pharmacist myself....and being a user. Obviously.
Well, that and I've made a few good friends in my time who happen to be chemists or pharmacists.
I should also put it out there that the drug world isn't populated entirely by cartels, human smugglers, and gang bangers. Lots of very decent human beings as well. Hell, make it all legal and you'll see.![]()
The difference is that most UTers are not elected officials that claim they have a zero tolerance attitude towards gangs. I would imagine most UTers that know "drug dealers", know small time cannabis dealers. There's an argument to be made that cannabis has to come from somewhere, and somewhere up the chain, there's gangs, or even organized crime involved, but with cannabis it's also possible it was grown in somebody's closet. In Ford's case he wasn't hanging out with small time cannabis retailers, he was hanging out with gang members zero degrees of separation away from violent crime.
Well, Rob was rather well rehearsed, not like his usual self at all. Someone polished him up a bit, I think his collar and tie even looked decent for a change. Hmmm...
Um, pharmacist is a term used for drug dealer and chemist is a term used for chemists aka the people who make/grow the drugs. I'm not talking about legal pharmaceuticals. Not all drugs come from Colombia, you know. Very many are locally sourced. 100 mile drug diet!
...Dale is a small, boyish-looking man who wears glasses and does intellectual stuff for a living...
So you used to deal drugs and that's how you know drug dealers. Why didn't you just say so?
Um, I did say that. I also said I met them in other ways.
Can I just say (again) that being in the business doesn't preclude one from being a respectable and decent person who contributes to society. Ford is not a decent human being and therein lies the problem. If his only "failing" was that he was a responsible drug user, I wouldn't have a problem with him beyond policy. He's not though. He's irresponsible, sociopathic, and consorts with violent criminals.
Not defending Lord BlackAdder but, is he named as a party in the notice? Thought that, apart from Ford, it was just Vision/Zoomer. Black has made it clear (clumsily. mind you) that in his own mind he was just an employee. That would appear to be his stickin' story.
Now, that I think of it, that is a way Ford could frame his libel defense: he did not know any better as he has the intellectual/emotional development of an evil 2year old
Christie Blatchford's piece today is especially pointless.
I used to enjoy her writing (she handles a lot of crime and trial stories, her frank outrage is at home in this arena) but her approach to the Ford saga has been infuriating. The strangest thing is, the effect is almost banal - like she's being told what tone and angle to take, and her heart really isn't into it. She ends up building straw men then knocking them down with straw brooms.
So, yeah, strike the Post off my morning scan.




