News   Nov 12, 2024
 290     0 
News   Nov 12, 2024
 430     0 
News   Nov 12, 2024
 498     0 

Transit and Urban Issues: Doomed to second class status?

A

Antiloop33rpm

Guest
Having followed urban issues in Canada quite extensively for the past 10 years I am wondering what people think of the progress that has been made in respect to issues such as public transit, public spaces, healthy cities, commercialization of our landscape, etc.

On one hand, I see that there have been some improvments made. When I lived in Ottawa I saw a transit system that slowly grew and was passable as an alternative to the car (assuming you lived within the greenbelt and within a neighborhood that predated the 60's). Toronto has seen some improvments to its system. Cities are gaining populaton in the urban areas and urban development has done well in the past decade. There are groups of citizens and political parties that do care about such issues and they have gained a respectable number of people among there ranks. So there have been some positive developments that are worth noting in the past decade.

But if you look outside of Toronto and into much of the surrounding GTA, at smaller cities such as Kitchener, Waterloo, Kingston, London, and even more starkly into smaller towns and villages, it negates any progress made rather quickly. Sprawl is still continuing at a rapid rate (evertime I am in Kingston visiting family I am amazed at how much land has been destroyed and developed since my last visit). Transit in smaller cities and villages is essentially nonexistent. Country side is continually being razed for multi acre lots with garish large homes. Wetlands are still being destroyed. Highways are still being built and expanded. Malls and now power centers and big box stores still continue to eat away at downtowns slowly adding to the count of boarded windows.

If you think about Ontario as a whole, its easy to travel across the province by car. Yet try travelling by train and your choices are limited and the service tolerable at best. If you consider energy policy, most provinces continue to look at oil, coal, and nuclear to help meet increased demand instead of reducing consumtion or looking for more sustainable sources.

I know that growth and development do come at a certain cost. But sometimes I shake my head and wonder just how intelligent we are going about it. Unfortunately I do not have any pictures yet to accompany this next observation, but I think it is one that many people will be able to relate to nonetheless. Growing up I spent an enourmous amount of time looking out the window of the family van as we travelled back and forth from Sarnia (where we lived at the time) to Kingston. In particular, the stretch of the 401 between Kingston and Toronto has been seen by myself so many times I could almost close my eyes and visual its entire length. The difference you notice driving down these stretch of highways now and 20 years ago is really quite dramatic. Where as most towns and cities along the way were barely visible from the highway, now most welcome travellers with seas of sprawl flowing to the highways edge, and in many cases, jumping across the highway and continuing to the other side. And a lot of what was just plain countryside has slowly become dotted with acre lots replacing small forests and farm land.

And this isnt even mentioning the sprawl in places like Mississauga, Oshawa, Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Markham, the suburban feeding tube that is the 407, etc.

What bothers me most is that as soon as I leave my comfortable little urban island, the reality of what beyond it really does not seem all that encouraging. If growth continues as it is right now for even another 10 or 15 years what kind of landscape will we be looking at in the more developed regions of Ontario and Quebec?

Which leads to another question. Is this just the way its going to be? Will Canada ultimately be a suburban society with niche urbanity and continue to sprawl across the landscape? We are a democratic society and it does seem that while there are people who do care about these issues, most people, dont. And as gas prices and the cost of suburban living creep higher and higher, will we find ourselves in a situation where people simpley give up the suburban lifestyle in favour of something more sustainable and affordable, or, will the will of the people choose measures such as lowering taxes, eliminating transit funding and social services, or other measures so that they can afford to continue living the lifestyle they do?

As I said above, its not that progress is nonexistent. But, if you look at the actions of people in terms of how they vote and what policies are important to them, how they choose to conduct there life (many people might hate Wal-Mart yet how often do you here someone say that who also shops there on a weekly basis at least). The environment is important to us, but we continue to build and expand roads, destroy wetlands, and have done nothing to encourage at the very least more intelligent sprawl.

Is change actually taking place? Or is it just superficial and something that will remain important to a minority who will ultimately still have to live under a suburban rule?
 
Transit and urban issues have been second class since the car became popular and will remain so for the forseeable future. Those of us who live downtown sometimes forget this but travel outside of the old city of Toronto or just look at a map of the GTA... mostly a suburban wasteland that continues to grow like a tumour by ferociously gobbling up farmland. We are and will continue to be a minority.
 
^Sadly, I would have to agree.

With respect to trains, as a frequent user of Via, I find train travel painful at times. The train between Toronto and Ottawa takes just as long as a car trip - if not longer with the almost inevitable delay. The trip itself is comfortable enough in terms of seating and so on, but if you need to be somewhere fast, well, plan way ahead. There is no "train-travelling" culture left in the country. People don't believe in trains anymore, yet the corridor route is a no-brainer for an effective service. But most people would rather use a car.
 
Turbo_Train2C_Montreal2C_1973.jpg


I actually came across this image just after I posted the article. It sums up just how high my expectations once where for issues such as rail travel, transit, and urban issues in this country, and how dissapointing it is to realize that just like Santa, its all a myth.

I would like to think that maybe one day this will all change. That maybe one day travelling from Montreal to Toronto by train wont mean I have to add 2 hours to my travel time just in case I once again find myself on a train that sits motionless for an hour while freight cars pass it by.

Instead, at a time when we have a surplus and the wealth in this country to actually construct a proper passenger rail infrastructure, invest in cities and create liveable, sustainable places, and also by doing, help to increase the quality of life in this country (and be prepared for what seems to an inevitable sharp rise in gas prices and demand beginning to greatly exceed supply) what do we do? Take tax cuts so we can save $30 on a plasma tv. And instead of planning ahead and at least protecting right of ways for the future, rail lines are being abandoned and sold of to developers.

Oh well. At least I came across a picture of that train again. It may not have worked well, but did it ever look cool.
 
Yep. Doomed until cheap energy runs out or people destroy the planet and finally wake up but a little too late. Look at Hazel McCallion... politician all those years and talking about Smart Growth only in the last 5 years. She (and her fellow politicians) could have made sure the whole city was properly developed over the time she was in office. Square One could have been built at Cooksville with rail connections, roads could have been built with less than 6 lanes, etc but the opposite is true and suburbanites in their SUVs and cars going through Tim Horton's drive-thrus love her for it. They got exactly what they wanted eventhough what they wanted is completely inefficient.

I went home to London for Christmas and the suburbs of London are being built exactly the same way as Mississauga. Big box stores, big parking lots, sprawl, and all but the biggest malls are dying because tennants are moving to big box developments. Christmas shopping there is hell because everything is big box except for two malls both of which don't have every store the other offers... you are stuck driving around all day to get what should be a trip to a single place with a critical mass of stores within walking distance. Christmas shopping in downtown Toronto is so much easier!

People don't care about the environment enough. I still know people that deny environmental problems even exist saying global warming is unsubstantiated, the water quality seems fine, animals are extinct because people didn't put them in a zoo, whats wrong burying all the trash because there is lots of space on the planet, whats wrong with disappearing farmland because I still have plenty of food, etc. Too many only care about their own needs rather than the big picture. Some will protest cottages going up on a lake or a road being built through the wilderness because their cottage or favorite camping was there already and they enjoyed their slice of nature but don't care if cottages go up on a different lake or a road is built somewhere else.
 
They got exactly what they wanted eventhough what they wanted is completely inefficient.

Yep. And I cant say for certain why, but it is a trait of our society that I dont understand.

Admittingly, I know that I probably have a slightly different view of Canadian society than a lot of people from my generation have developed. I spent most of my time growing up the family farm which has been in the family for over 100 years. Im a 6th generation Canadian. I did spend some living in a small town of 1500 on the St Clair River but other than that, I was basically raised on rather traditional, socialist rural values. I didnt go to a high school that was current with pop culture (unless it had to do with country music or The Tragically Hip). I didnt get my licence because I wanted to have a car and cruise around town and be cool. I did it because without one I couldnt go anywhere. Family trips where camping, visiting provincial parks, lots of time spent in Toronto and Ottawa. I went to schools that trumpted Canadian propoghanda ever chance they could. I got 3 american tv stations on good days and no american radio stations.

When I graduated high school and moved to Toronto my view of society was that either you lived in the country and lived a rural lifestyle, or, you lived a city where you could live in an urban environment that was in complete contrast. I never really understood suburban living. Anytime I would visit a suburban area like Mississauga or Pickering or London, I could never understand what the appeal was. In some cases I could understand. If you want to have a family then it made sense, especially if you had 3 or 4 kids. If you were just starting out and all you could afford was a house in the suburbs, you moved there until you could buy something in the city. But beyond that, it baffled me.

And it still does. Its not necessarily the idea of suburban living. I can understand just wanting a house with a little lawn and some space from people. Something that is cozy and healthy for raising a family. But the suburbs that are actually built are just so sterile, trashy, vast wastelands of mindless consumption and cheap homes simply dropped haphazardly into a manufactured landscape. I have the same experience when I visit family in Kingston. I spend more time than I think should be possible stuck in a car. Driving around, waiting at stop lights, finding parking. And when you do get somewhere, its little more than an island, in most cases, an isolated pocket of consumerism that flashes bright and loud images trying to empty your wallet. Most of the suburban areas have no connection to public spaces or any notion of something beyond rampant individualism.

It shouldnt surprise me that in this society, it is inevitable that communal spaces and modes of transportation are going to slowly find themselves struggling to stay alive. And unless something dramatic happens to our society to change our habits, its likely that the car and other individualistic items and habits will win out. Still, there is that part of me that still thinks who would really want to drive from Montreal to Toronto and deal with growing traffic on the 401, pit stops, weather, etc, when you can take a train that in many cases can do the trip in a shorter period of time and requires nothing of you but to sit back, enjoy a beer and relax?

Its strange to think that such a large proportion of society think I am weird because I dont want to own a car, enjoy taking the train, dont want to live in a big house in the suburbs, but rather, a cozy apartment in the city, dont watch much tv, listen to the radio, and enjoy building relationships with my family and community in meaningful ways and not just always sitting around a tv staring aimlessly for hours on end and then spending the remaining time talking about what we thought of the show and what else we have seen on tv (big screen of course) that week. Im not claiming that my way of living is better than anyone elses, but so many people just seem to blindly follow the religion of suburban and never question it, only consuming until they have become so lethargic that they require a $5000 motorized gyroscopic scooter to replace the normal action of walking.

I believe everyone has the right and freedom to live their own life as they please, which is why its either really depressing that so many people have made a concious decision to life as they do, or depressing because so many people are simply not questioning their own actions for long enough to maybe explore something outside of what they know and maybe become just a little more socially aware of what consequences their actions are having on everyone around them, in addition to themselves.
 
People don't care about the environment enough. I still know people that deny environmental problems even exist saying global warming is unsubstantiated, the water quality seems fine, animals are extinct because people didn't put them in a zoo, whats wrong burying all the trash because there is lots of space on the planet, whats wrong with disappearing farmland because I still have plenty of food, etc.

:rollin

Funny...but also very sad...and scary.

The land issue is one that pro-suburban people I know bring up all the time...they just say something like 'but Canada has so much under utilized land, who cares if everyone uses their car in this small area'? Unforunately it isn't that simple...
 
Ah yes, the "turbo". Talk about a doomed project. Damn thing burst into flames a number of times.
 
Its strange to think that such a large proportion of society think I am weird because I dont want to own a car, enjoy taking the train, dont want to live in a big house in the suburbs...

I think that sometimes it's a case of them being "programmed" to think that it's weird. "Normal" is living in a big house with two cars, a fenced in yard, having to drive anywhere and everywhere. They think it's "normal" to live beyond their means, to use more resources than is needed.

A friend of mine is like this. Him and his wife have a 1500 sq.ft. (not including basement) new home in Aurora with 3 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, a backyard, and 2 cars. They have no children (which are still a few years off...), never use their backyard, and spend 80% of their time in about 1/3 of their house (their kitchen/den and bedroom). They live there because that's what's expected of them... have to have a house with a yard, have to have cars, etc., etc.

Contrast that to myself and my fiance, Tracy. Same age, same economic circumstances, a few years away from having kids as well... we live in a 500 sq.ft. 1-bedroom condo near Little India. Tracy works at Yonge & Davisville (the job being on a subway line was a determining factor when she accepted it), so it's a quite bus-subway-subway ride (or a streetcar-subway ride) to work. I work downtown, so either take the streetcar (506) in inclement weather, but mostly bike (like today). Whenever we have kids, we'll get a larger place. We don't need more space at the moment.

So, on the one hand, you have our friends, who have bought too much house and too much land for where they are in their lives right now. Consequently, they have to drive to work, drive to buy groceries, drive to visit friends, and this is "normal". If they go out to dinner, it's always "what chain restaurant haven't we been to in a while?"

Tracy and I, on the other hand, have bought what we need (and put a lot more into savings, RSPs, etc.), use public transit or our bikes to get around, and when we go out to eat, we are a 20 minute maximum walk from Little India, or the Danforth, or the Beaches, and try out new, independent restaurants and recognize people on the streets.

Tracy and I spend a weekend up there and honestly, by Sunday night have to get out of their because the whole mindset is just weird. I've heard 30 minute conversations at PARTIES about all the good sales on at WalMart that week!

I used to hold out hope that rising gas prices would help people wake up to the negatives of suburban sprawl, but am pessimistic in thinking we'll just shift to an era of lower gas taxes and more hybrid vehicles (which pollute less, but still perpetuate the car-centric lifestyle). The costs of getting around will change, but not too negatively. I am worried more as I see Harper leading in the polls too. I sooo hope the NDP holds the balance of power after the 23rd.
 
A friend of mine is like this. Him and his wife have a 1500 sq.ft. (not including basement) new home in Aurora with 3 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, a backyard, and 2 cars. They have no children (which are still a few years off...), never use their backyard, and spend 80% of their time in about 1/3 of their house (their kitchen/den and bedroom). They live there because that's what's expected of them... have to have a house with a yard, have to have cars, etc., etc.

Everyone appears to have some friends like this. I have some friends who never use their back yard. It is essentially a giant parking space for their barbeque. Other than that, it is a lawn to be mowed. They find it odd that one would not want to own a house witha yard, driveway, garage, etc. Their parents worked long and hard to acquire a suburban home, so they see the purchase of a suburban home as an achievement, a marker of success.

There is nothing wrong with that idea theoretically. If they feel successful owning a home, good for them. But what I find fascinating is the competition on house size among so many house owners. The people who own the larger homes view themselves as more successful than their friends with the smaller places. The folks with the smaller places comment that all the new homes are out in the new evil, faceless suburbia, not the older more established suburbia. The dynamics and perceptions of success on the basis of house status is intriguing to me, as I have no interest in owning a house.
 
One of the primarly reasons is that congestion isn't bad enough yet despite the rhetoric. We have not been forced out of our complacency enough because the problem isn't bad enough.

True. I think another reason that this type of complacency exist is in part due to persepctive. For that small percentage who do tend to explore and use European or Asian culture as a baseline in regards to these issues, its obvious where we stand.

However I would guess that most people are going to be influenced by American culture to a far greater degree, if not in many cases entirely. If you use the US as a baseline, then, its easy to think that we are doing just fine. Its not bad, or surprising, that so many people would be more influenced by American culture than any other given they are so large and most Canadians live close to the border.

There are aspects of modern cities that, in an odd way, do offer some encouragement. Big box stores, power centers, wide boulevards, and dying malls are the best example I can think of right now. Yes they are ugly, produce more sprawl and excess traffic and pollution. But, by design, these buildings will all be useless in 30 years as their design life expires. 20 years from now when todays power centers are abandoned, this is going to reopen large parcels of land, that, assuming society has begun to clue in, can offer a chance to create more sustainable places among seas of sprawl. There are plenty of boulevards that are oversized with rows of grass strips and houses with their back to them that could be used to create new streets and boulevards that connect and not divide communities. And there are lots of other small projects that could be undertaken even with what is being built today that would allow modern suburbs to be transformed into something more sustainable and liveable.

Even with those positive sides, its still a sad picture to imagine what will happen to Southern Ontario and Eastern Quebec with another 20 years of the same mindless sprawl. As you said Tdot, people like to say that it will be fine because we have lots of land, which is true, if people were living across all of it. But when you look at the area that actually contains the bulk of the population from Windsor to Quebec, its not really big at all. 20 years from now it would not be far off to imagine driving from Cobourg to Waterloo and be surrounded by an almost endless landscape of suburban sprawl.

The dynamics and perceptions of success on the basis of house status is intriguing to me, as I have no interest in owning a house.

It could be just another part of the indoctrination prcoess in an ownership society, or it could be a side effect of it. What actually causes it to be such, Im not sure, it would be an interesting topic to research though.

I always find Christmas interesting since it is now the only time of the year that I actually see my extended family. Of everyone, my parents and brothers family included, I am the only one who lives in a city. Everyone else either lives in the suburbs, or in the country. The same comments are inevitable each year (and this is largely the case in most social settings were the majority are suburbanites). First I hear smart ass comments about how small my apartment is and a few knocks about me being a non car owning socialist. After biting my tounge, having a smoke, and moving on from coffee to beer, I spend the rest of the time not saying a word and listening instead. It might start off with what the latest shows on TV are and the finer points of what makes a reality show good. Then it moves into talking about all the cool stuff they have bought. Who has a new, bigger, flatter, thinner TV this year? What car do you drive now? Which room are you going to redo based on the design brilliance of trading spaces? Etc, etc. Then there is a brief discussion about politics which is largely everyone ranting about welfare bums, how the government steals their money, and other enlightened tid bits. Then it moves on into a round of trivia (usually the questions are culled from the latest pop culture version of Trivial Pursuit), followed by more excess eating and then capping off the night. This year included a bonus discussion on conspiracy theories and how the government in the US was actually behind the bombing of the World Trade Towers (for that one I just stood in the kitchen and listened with my sister in-laws friend while we laughed and agreed that the whole thing was nonsense and got into an interesting discussion about the role of the military in American society).
 
I have learned over the years that their are a few percent of the population who care deeply about such issues and the rest will only move when pushed. Most regions and countries that take such issues serious are places where the crap has already hit the fan. Life is still too good in Canada. We often look to europe and asia with envy as places who care more about such issues. But look at the difference, those regions have largely already destroyed their entire natural environments, grown to populations that are unsustainable based on their land-use and resources, and nearly obliterated their civilizations several times in the last hundred years. Take an issue like transportation. People talk about congestion and ask why we aren't doing anything about it. One of the primarly reasons is that congestion isn't bad enough yet despite the rhetoric. We have not been forced out of our complacency enough because the problem isn't bad enough.
 
^that is actually a fairly diverse range of topics. I have similar experiences where the conversation revolves around picking apart what are the best new deals on boxing day at Best Buy or how people have perfected the art of returning merchandise to demand post-holiday deals. Consumption is both a cultural pursuit and hobby. I spoke to a cousin's husband at a christmas function a few years back who lives in Agincourt about the arrival of the subway line in his area. His reply was that if the subway were to be extended to Scarborough city centre he would move to get away from it. Sadly, living in Agincourt he is one of the more urban of the clan.
 
Fantastic thread guys. Intelligently argued and very well said. Very depressing too. I keep thinking a paradigm shift is just around the corner, but it never seems to happen.

I wish Stephen Harper could read this. Heck, I wish all those party leaders could.
 
Very depressing too. I keep thinking a paradigm shift is just around the corner, but it never seems to happen.

It is, or rather was a bit depressing to write at first. Sometimes a reality check is good though. It might be dissapointing too someone who cares about these issues to think that most people still dont care, but at least having a realistic understanding of the situation allows people to actually understand what is really going on and see it with clear vision and not through rose coloured glasses which would only lead to useless ideas, solutions and a lot of wasted energy for nothing.

I too thought that in the past years that a paradigm shift was just around the corner. That it would not be long before we saw people in the suburbs, even if in limited numbers, starting to reject and stand up against big box development and start demanding better transit through local action groups. And while in the central area of cities there has been a shift with more people living downtown and condos having become a key market for real in large cities such as Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver, it is really only this area that growth and change has actually taken place.

If it were just as simple as geographical relocations or physical alterations to the urban landscape, then maybe we would be seeing a greater increase in urban development and a decline in modern form suburbia. I think though, that one aspect that is very often overlooked in these discussions are, what might best be described as, cultural differences.

Take for example someone living in the suburbs of Markham. The existence in most cases is a very bland, monotonous, corporate one. You park your cars in the driveway or in the garage. You drive everywhere. Free parking is abundant. You can walk or bike around your neighborhood but for exercise, it is highly likely a person will instead frequent a gym tucked neatly inside a Loblaws or use the treadmill that sits perpendicular to their big screen TV. Chapters has replaced the local library. Public spaces are a result of bylaw requirements. The story is familiar to most.

Now offer up an alternative suburbia for one of its residents. You park your car in the street. You offer even just a convenience store within walking distance. Public spaces and public services such as libraries are built not as a way to meet developer guidelines but rather as a key part of the community. Big box stores are not littered across the landscape but rather segregrated near industrial parks and in smaller quantities than before. Shopping can be done by parking near a local shopping district where a person may have to walk a little more than usual. Public transit is accesible and not seen as the 'poor' alternative.

All these little changes may not seem like much but too many it could be quite a big deal to give up what they currently know. With so much indoctrination having taken place over there lifetime, it isnt just moving into a slightly smaller, more efficient home, buying fewer consumer items, and maybe taking part in a less commercial, more social environment, its giving up what they believe to be the elements that make a person successful. A good example are the previous posts which talk about many of the interesting conversations people have been involved with or overheard. Shopping isnt just a necessary activity that one does to get their groceries or those items we all need in life. Its a hobby, a game, something to be practiced, perfected, refined. A way to show ones superiority for having found the blue medium sweater that only one Gap location in Toronto had, or managing to get the manager to knock 15% off the price of a book because the back upper left corner had a small dogear.

Another simple element might be parking your car in the driveway. Driveways and garages are ugly and removing them might do a lot to create a more attractive, inviting urban landscape for people to explore. But the driveway also serves as an asphalt or paver stone pedistal for that most religous of suburban items, the car. Without it, it would have to be parked in the street. And in the street, the random forces of nature take hold. Where as in the driveway, people know that that car is yours, in the streets, its uncertain. What if your poor next door neighbor cant park in front of his house and instead parks his less than pretty car in front of yours? What will people think? What if I have to park my shiny new SUV in front of someone elses house and people think it belongs to them?

I think the examples serve well because they illustrate the underlying psychy that I think defines some rather stark ideological differences between being a modern suburbanite and simply a person who lives in the suburbs.

Another case in point. Consumerism vs. politics. Say Mr Jones buys a stereo. He takes it home, it works fine, but he notices that it doesnt go with his decor, or there is a scratch on one side of receiver, or generally is not happy with it. In this case, there is a good chance that Mr Jones will take the time to repackage it, go back to the store, wait in line at customer service, and then spent as much time as necessary to ensure it is replaced with a non-scratched or different item. All this requires to use his own free time and energy to engage in this activity, which he does so without thinking. Now its election time for Mr Jones. Is he going to put the same effort into picking his election choice that he does when buying any new consumer item? He reads Consumer Reports and other reviews exhaustively to find out what item is the best, but to what extent will he go to when trying to find out about the candidates? And if he makes a choice for the election that turns out not be what he expected, will he expend the same amount of energy on trying to address those issues as he would to replacing a scratched stereo?

I know its a rather hypothetical and generalized overview, but again, these are the kinds of attitudes that persist in suburbia.

And I think it these difference, the cultural and ideological ones that are going to be the hardest to overcome in terms of trying to create more sustainable, less sprawling cities.

There also needs to be an alernative to this that people can actually see and explore and interact with before any change will take place. It would be unrealistic to expect suburbia to enmasse decide to change the nature of its being based on visions and ideas. As is the case in many instances, people want to see for themselves what they are jumping into before making a switch.

This is why I am not hopeless in the long term that change will happen. But its also why change will not happen overnight. If you look at downtown Toronto and the neighborhoods that immediately surround it, there is a deffinite, palapable change taking place. Its not just that people are moving from the suburbs to the city, but also changing their own personal habits from consumer driven, suburban ones to more public oriented urban ones. This forum, urban blogs and magazines, the changing urban culture in Toronto, are not a result of grand plans to turn Toronto into an urban space. Its a slow, people driven process where changing attitudes have helped shape how people interact with and see the city.

Take for example the condo market. In the early 90's most of the condos were terrible. Excessive accomodation for parking, bad design, not much attention to fitting in with the urban context around them. They were places to live downtown, but many did not have that urban connection. If you compare those condos with what is built now, its quite a bit different. There are far more midrise condos, more attention to detail, a greater desire to create buildings are part of the urban fabric and offer more seemless integrations between the living space and the urban space. And in another 15 years, we will likely see even more progress in condos and yet more of our grievences addressed as the culture of urbanity starts to dictate these changes.

In the short term, its rather depressing. But in the long term there does seem to be mommentum and the forces of change are taking place. We might want things to move faster or cringe when we see stupid, short sighted decisions being made. But I think that a little change in perspective and understanding that this is ultimately not going to result in 'trendy' urban living that is little more than a fad and appeals to the whims of suburbanites who move on once they have become bored with it. It is actually the development of an urban culture, one that isnt just suburbanity masked in urban clothing, but one that is ideologically different in many facets of daily life. I think that so long as that part of our understanding of the problems of our city do revolve around cultural differences and not just physical ones, we can not only better understand the problems, but better fix them too.
 

Back
Top