Toronto U of T: New Harbord Residence | 30.19m | 9s | U of T | Michael Maltzan

Marcanadian

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
4,015
Reaction score
11,428
40 HARBORD ST
Ward 11 - Tor & E.York District


Site Plan Control application for a new 10-storey student residence building with an overall building height of approximately 34.9 metres including the mechanical penthouse.
Proposed Use ---​
# of Storeys ---​
# of Units ---​
Type​
Number​
Date Submitted​
Status​
Applications:
Site Plan Approval​
19 259130 STE 11 SA​
Dec 9, 2019​
Under Review​
OPA & Rezoning​
19 259116 STE 11 OZ​
Dec 9, 2019​
Under Review​

Screen Shot 2019-12-10 at 8.39.43 AM.png


 
And OPA and Rezoning. Currently designated Neighbourhoods. Curious whether it will go to Institutional or Mixed Use.

1575986068988.png


The owner of all properties is the University of Toronto. Depth of all properties is 107' = 32.6m. Details as follows:

AddressFrontage (ft)PurchasedSale Amount
40 Harbord25May 21, 1968$2
44 Harbord25May 30, 2008$1,080,000
48 Harbord25July 4, 2008$865,000
50-56 Harbord81Not availableNot available

All in all the site is about 156' wide x 107' deep = 16,692 SF, or 47.5m wide x 32.6m deep = 1,550.7 m2. That's 0.38 acres.

Good to see this dumpy row of houses finally evolving. It's the block between Grad House (west) and Hillel (east).

1575986788756.png
 

Attachments

  • 1575986724719.png
    1575986724719.png
    722.4 KB · Views: 450
Last edited:
I absolutely love it. It is completely appropriate for the location, land use, institutional goals, Secondary Plan goals, and OP goals. If City Planning gives the University a hard time or drags this out into a lengthy process I will be so disappointed.

The City Planner on the file is Paul Johnson, Senior Planner.

Land use designation proposed is Institutional Areas.

Here is the consultant team:

1576073100282.png
1576073110964.png
 
Michael Maltzan out of LA is doing this. aA is the architect of record:

View attachment 219590View attachment 219591View attachment 219592

I liked the post above out of appreciation for the post...............but I'm not sold on the proposal here.

The massing is ok, but I'm not sold on this being taller than Graduate House.

There's certainly some creativity and I'm all for the idea of brick; but I find it a bit too Fort like........a fault it shares with Graduate House and with Robarts and the Rec. Ctr across the street.

Curiously I'm one to call out fitting in w/context as important; but the context universally shares a flaw, I'm not sure I see the need to repeat it.

It also appears to be too close Harbord, the sidewalk needs to be wider there and this needs to be set back another 1m or so.
 
Interesting brick work, the windows are nice, but it looks like it sucks on the street level. Hard to tell from lack of a render, but it looks like yet another boring glass wall, and a monolithic overhang above. At least extend the fancy brick work to the ground floor like King/Portland did. It looks nice at first glance, but in terms of massing and pedestrian experience I'm not impressed.
 

Back
Top