Northern Light
Superstar
68 storeys? I doubt that a 200+ m building would be approved in that area.
The 68 storey tower referenced is 'The Grand' hotel site at 225 Jarvis (this thread), not the development up by Sheppard.
68 storeys? I doubt that a 200+ m building would be approved in that area.
I know. But I doubt they would approve a 200+ m tower at Jarvis & Dundas. The current approved (?) height for the redevelopment is just under 154 m. A 68 storey building would be at least 210 m.The 68 storey tower referenced is 'The Grand' hotel site at 225 Jarvis (this thread), not the development up by Sheppard.
The trees listed above are Carolinian tree species which are native to the North Shore of Lake Erie, where i live. There are a fair number of Tulip trees around my house. Toronto may be at the northern edge of the growing zone, but there
is a good chance they will be ok.
I know. But I doubt they would approve a 200+ m tower at Jarvis & Dundas. The current approved (?) height for the redevelopment is just under 154 m. A 68 storey building would be at least 210 m.
Maybe they plan to squeeze 68 floors into a 154 m building, with sub-8 ft ceiling. That would be a new low for Toronto
What's the Toronto equivalent of the New Jersey turnpike? Maybe they could build it there instead.View attachment 391590
Brignews.com
The 68 storey tower referenced is 'The Grand' hotel site at 225 Jarvis (this thread), not the development up by Sheppard.
New docs were submitted Feb 10, 2022. Storey count seems to be unaltered at 49 floors.
Link to application: http://app.toronto.ca/AIC/index.do?folderRsn=8EElUss5dNPZzqBG+XG+Yg==
On a unrelated (or related?) note, I came across the post on Linkedin, not including the OP's name/photo for privacy reasons, but their original post is linked below. It looks like this is the site in question, perhaps at 68 storey version was considered at some point?
Source:
Sign Up | LinkedIn
500 million+ members | Manage your professional identity. Build and engage with your professional network. Access knowledge, insights and opportunities.www.linkedin.com
View attachment 380937
Wasnt the original rational for the limited height here due to flight paths?
So they cant possibly be getting additional height if that's the case.