Northern Light
Superstar
The Lobbyist Registry tells us Pinedale is looking to put this property along with the adjacent 141 Isabella in play.
The site currently houses a 7-storey rental building, and a seeing heritage house that is neither listed nor designated.
Streetview:
Adjacent 'heritage':
Aerial Pic:
Site size is ~1700m2 or about 18,500ft2
Comments: This one should come as no surprise..............the nominal precedent is the ask next door at 135 Isabella (not yet passed by Council) where the applicant is seeking 69s.
Thread here: https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threa...7m-69s-kingsett-capital-bdp-quadrangle.35919/
This site is physically large enough to accommodate a tower form, though it may be constrained somewhat by separation distance requirements with abutting owners. Currently, nothing would prevent a proponent here from demo'ing the 'heritage'
Were they to do, it would be a bit easier to get the right footprint for a tower; though if the choice was to preserve the facade only of the said building, there's still lots of room to play with; where the site is a bit more constrained if the majority of the heritage were retain in-situ.
To the east of this site is surface parking currently associated to the older rental building at 540 Sherbourne. There may be implications for that site; there is also a hydro substation right at Sherbourne/Isabella. Clearly necessary infrastructure, but I'm not sure what Hydro's long term plans are for this 1-storey structure.
The site currently houses a 7-storey rental building, and a seeing heritage house that is neither listed nor designated.
Streetview:
Adjacent 'heritage':
Aerial Pic:
Site size is ~1700m2 or about 18,500ft2
Comments: This one should come as no surprise..............the nominal precedent is the ask next door at 135 Isabella (not yet passed by Council) where the applicant is seeking 69s.
Thread here: https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threa...7m-69s-kingsett-capital-bdp-quadrangle.35919/
This site is physically large enough to accommodate a tower form, though it may be constrained somewhat by separation distance requirements with abutting owners. Currently, nothing would prevent a proponent here from demo'ing the 'heritage'
Were they to do, it would be a bit easier to get the right footprint for a tower; though if the choice was to preserve the facade only of the said building, there's still lots of room to play with; where the site is a bit more constrained if the majority of the heritage were retain in-situ.
To the east of this site is surface parking currently associated to the older rental building at 540 Sherbourne. There may be implications for that site; there is also a hydro substation right at Sherbourne/Isabella. Clearly necessary infrastructure, but I'm not sure what Hydro's long term plans are for this 1-storey structure.