News   Jul 15, 2024
 54     0 
News   Jul 15, 2024
 332     0 
News   Jul 15, 2024
 533     0 

Survey: US evangelicals most likely to support torture

Mongo

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
2,325
Reaction score
215
Survey: Support for terror suspect torture differs among the faithful

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The more often Americans go to church, the more likely they are to support the torture of suspected terrorists, according to a new survey.

More than half of people who attend services at least once a week -- 54 percent -- said the use of torture against suspected terrorists is "often" or "sometimes" justified. Only 42 percent of people who "seldom or never" go to services agreed, according to the analysis released Wednesday by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.

White evangelical Protestants were the religious group most likely to say torture is often or sometimes justified -- more than six in 10 supported it. People unaffiliated with any religious organization were least likely to back it. Only four in 10 of them did.

The analysis is based on a Pew Research Center survey of 742 American adults conducted April 14-21. It did not include analysis of groups other than white evangelicals, white non-Hispanic Catholics, white mainline Protestants and the religiously unaffiliated, because the sample size was too small.

The president of the National Association of Evangelicals, Leith Anderson, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The survey asked: "Do you think the use of torture against suspected terrorists in order to gain important information can often be justified, sometimes be justified, rarely be justified, or never be justified?"

Roughly half of all respondents -- 49 percent -- said it is often or sometimes justified. A quarter said it never is.

The religious group most likely to say torture is never justified was Protestant denominations -- such as Episcopalians, Lutherans and Presbyterians -- categorized as "mainline" Protestants, in contrast to evangelicals. Just over three in 10 of them said torture is never justified. A quarter of the religiously unaffiliated said the same, compared with two in 10 white non-Hispanic Catholics and one in eight evangelicals.

The Religious Dimensions of the Torture Debate

(percentages of those who gave definite answers)

White Evangelicals: never or rarely 35% sometimes or often 65%
White non-Hispanic Catholics: never or rarely 52% sometimes or often 48%
White mainline Protestants: never or rarely 53% sometimes or often 47%
Non-church-goers: never or rarely 56% sometimes or often 44%

Wow. The numbers speak for themselves.
 
Last edited:
Well, I suppose that's fair. After all, I'm most likely to support torture of US "evangelicals" (really, more accurately, fundamentalists).
 
it just doesn't seem very Christian, does it? It's both amazing and terrifying that so many are in one way obsessed with the teachings of Jesus, and yet seem to act in ways which are often unequivocally opposed to what he preached. Love thy enemy, anyone? Anyone?

Not that I love my enemies, but I'm not Christian.

Also amazing about this is that so many fundies would say that without belief in god, it is impossible to have a moral compass. It's all so frustrating sometimes.
 
Ah, evangelicals. Delivering love through hate for hundreds of generations!
 
I have certainly noticed that the more "fundamentalist" somebody is, the more likely they are to exhibit Taliban-like traits in their behavior.

Possibly because people who are attracted to fundamentalism tend to have black-and-white, tribal, follow-the-leader personalities, and the leaders they follow and whose opinions they adopt have the same tribalistic attitudes, so when they are told that it's okay for the other guy to suffer or die for the Greater Good, they automatically tend to agree.
 
Is evangelical and fundamentalist entirely interchangeable? Someone can be evangelical but not a fundamentalist, right? Although most evangelical types are probably very fundamentalist in their beliefs of an inerrant Bible (as they interpret it) and believe in spreading the word??

Those two terms have always been interesting in their use.

The most hilarious usage of fundamentalist is when someone says "you are a fundamentalist atheist" as if atheism is some religion, when its not. That's another use of the word I find interesting.
 
I've always found some fundamentalists to be a form of torture. No surprise that many condone it.
 
Guess they missed the whole Jesus part that their religion was supposedly founded upon. Odd, that.
 
Everyone else in this thread has already accurately assessed the mindset of conservative evangelicals in some form. Being more supportive of torture while insisting they hold to the ideals of the founding fathers takes a strong display of moral compartmentalization but this is hardly surprising given the world of moral absolutes they live in and the way they reject any viewpoint other than their own--Bush is the obvious example here.

Conservative evangelicals still constitute a huge voting bloc in U.S. politics and though their party is faltering they aren't going anywhere. To pursue their narrow agenda they will follow one of their own rather blindly and can make even a cretin go far through their efforts--Palin being the most recent case in point. If things don't go well for Obama over the next four years they will do their best to get back into a position to influence the next government. And that's a cause for concern.
 
here's a short Christian response to the survey which I thought was thoughtful.

http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctliveblog/archives/2009/05/evangelicals_an.html

There's way to much abuse of religion by Republicans and some major religious leaders ("Republican Jesus"). I think one of the biggest problems is people like Dobson who didn't endorse McCain because McCain was against torture and wanted to fight global warming.. I think there is change happening in the states, people are realizing that the Repubs are just using them and convincing them to endorse un-Christlike policies, but then again look at all the McCain/Palin rallies...
 
Is evangelical and fundamentalist entirely interchangeable? Someone can be evangelical but not a fundamentalist, right? Although most evangelical types are probably very fundamentalist in their beliefs of an inerrant Bible (as they interpret it) and believe in spreading the word??

You've basically got it. For the most part, all fundamentalists are evangelical, but many evangelicals are not fundamentalist. Evangelical doesn't really have an exact definition, but it seems to include essentially all new-world protestant christian churches. A good example of the difference is Pentecostalism, which is evangelical and is closely associated with the "religious right", but is not a fundamentalist church.
 
it just doesn't seem very Christian, does it? It's both amazing and terrifying that so many are in one way obsessed with the teachings of Jesus, and yet seem to act in ways which are often unequivocally opposed to what he preached. Love thy enemy, anyone? Anyone?


these people idolizing and worship the pain Jesus suffered, but never listen to anything he every said. Case and point, the film Passion of the Christ.

If Jesus was alive he would be a socialist.... :D
 

Back
Top