News   Jan 20, 2026
 441     0 
News   Jan 20, 2026
 1.5K     9 
News   Jan 20, 2026
 943     1 

SOM's innovative China skyscraper projects

W

wyliepoon

Guest
Architectural Record

Link to article

Not Innovative? SOM’s Skyscraper Projects in China Tell A Different Story

June 15, 2006

Skidmore, Owings and Merrill (SOM), architect of New York’s 1,776-foot Freedom Tower, is known perhaps more than any other firm for its skyscraper designs. Designs like the Sears Tower in Chicago and the Lever House in New York helped establish the U.S. as the world’s leading tall-building innovator during the latter half of the 20th century. But, as critic Nicolai Ouroussoff recently pointed out in the New York Times, the firm’s recent domestic tall building work has been more formulaic. What he didn’t mention was that the firm is still putting together groundbreaking work in China, which has become a laboratory of sorts for the firm’s experimental skyscraper design work.

The company has over 50 buildings and planning projects in China, and more than 15 of them are skyscrapers. Most utilize the firm’s own engineering. Firm partner Tom Kerwin says that Chinese clients are much more willing to embark on experimental work than their counterparts in the U.S., who are often hesitant to take commercial risks, security risks, or to upset neighbors or trade unions.

“There’s a commitment to upgrading the quality of life in China,†says Kerwin. They take real pride in pushing the envelope.†Lack of public dissent, cheaper building materials, a demand for urban density and green buildings, and an intense desire for international recognition also encourages such work.

The firm’s most recent commission is the 1,000-foot-tall Pearl River Tower in Guanzhou, for the Guangdong Tobacco Company, which SOM says will be one of the greenest buildings in the world. The project’s green elements include a water-retention area; basement fuel cells, which produce electricity by extracting hydrogen from natural gas; façade-integrated photovoltaics; a condensate reclamation system that collects water and reuses it; and stack ventilation, which captures and uses heat caught between the building’s double-layer facade. The building’s curved shapes form two apertures where air is directed into wind turbines.

Here are some of SOM’s other towers.

* The 1,050-foot-tall Nanjing Jinling Hotel, which also features offices and apartments, is sited in the heart of Nanjing's commercial center. The building's skin forms a diagonal grid that functions like a twisting tube. It looks a lot like one of the firm’s original designs for the Freedom Tower. Construction should wrap up in 2008.
* The 760-foot-tall Jinao Tower, an office and hotel complex in Nanjing, will feature a glass facade that alternately folds inward and outward, articulating a sense of movement. Like New York’s new Hearst Tower, it is built around a diagonal grid bracing system, an efficient support for lateral load that uses less steel than the typical skyscraper. The building’s double-skinned surface will provide solar shading and create an insulating- climate chamber to reduce temperatures inside the building.
* Nanjing Greenland, a complex of three steel-frame, concrete-core glass towers. The tallest building, at least 985 feet tall, will include a faceted glass surface imbedded with irregularly-spaced slots for green space that “march vertically up the facade,†according to Kerwin. The other towers, about 100 meters tall, will include roof gardens and a sunken green square.
* The 990-foot China World Trade Center, in Beijing, will be the centerpiece of Beijing’s developing business district. The glass-and-steel tower very gradually steps back as it rises, looking a bit like a giant square telescope. Its facade is layered with a series of faceted vertical glass-and-metal fins, creating a texture that the firm says will look somewhat like a waterfall.
* The 920-foot Zhengdong Hotel, in Zhengdong is inspired by the proportions of a Chinese pagoda. The building appears to be quite elegant, separated into distinct sections, and curving outward in a concave fashion on each face from the center. The cylindrical central atrium reaches almost to the top of the building, creating a dizzying, spiral-like spectacle when one looks skyward. A heliostat,, which tracks the sun to bring reflect additional daylight into the atrium, sits at the top of the tower.
* Poly International Plaza, in Guangzhou features a glass curtain wall, and is built with metal cross-bracing, allowing for column-free space for office floors, and to let light into enter all areas of the building. A large opening halfway up the building helps reduce wind loads, and also serves as a huge, open outdoor terrace.

Meanwhile, progress on the Freedom Tower has languished due to political and legal squabbles, and its original design was compromised due to security concerns. Perhaps it’s a symbol of America’s lack of innovation, even complacency? “There are some places in the world’ they have this optimism and can do attitude. Sometimes I wonder if we’ve lost that,†says SOM engineer Bill Baker. The Empire State Building, by contrast, was built in 18 months.

060615som8lg.jpg

Pearl River Tower (Guangzhou)

060615som1lg.jpg

Jinao Tower (Nanjing)

060615som2lg.jpg

Nanjing Jinling Hotel

060615som3lg.jpg

Nanjing Greenland

060615som4lg.jpg

China World Trade Centre (Beijing)

060615som5lg.jpg

Zhengdong Hotel

060615som6lg.jpg

Poly International Plaza (Guangzhou)

060615som7lg.jpg

Shenzhen AVIC Plaza
 
And at BA we get a box (and probably not a green box or a box with an interesting cladding treatment). *sigh*
 
I love how they always show light coming out of the tops of the towers...like some kind of spiritual moment or something.
 
Meanwhile, progress on the Freedom Tower has languished due to political and legal squabbles, and its original design was compromised due to security concerns. Perhaps it’s a symbol of America’s lack of innovation, even complacency? “There are some places in the world’ they have this optimism and can do attitude. Sometimes I wonder if we’ve lost that,†says SOM engineer Bill Baker. The Empire State Building, by contrast, was built in 18 months.

We're not the only ones feeling this it seems.
 
It's a rather rich thing for the firm that "elbowed" Libeskind out of the picture to talk about such things...

AoD
 
"And at BA we get a box (and probably not a green box or a box with an interesting cladding treatment). *sigh*"

Yeah that sucks....but at least we can take comfort in the fact that we don't live in an oppressive police state where the government controls what we think and say while they push their nationalistic agenda on us and the world at the expense of 80 percent of the country's citizens who have no rights and who still live in third world conditions without a snowball's chance in hell of ever benefiting from their country's newfound prosperity except perhaps when a discarded sofa floats down the river amongst the toxic waste and filth and they are able to fish it out and sit on it while they ponder where they'll get their next drink of water since the river they've used for hundreds of generations is no longer an option.

China has pretty skyscrapers, though.

On another note, that tower with the big spire on it has to be the tallest building ever proposed in Greenland. I think the current tallest building there is Anuk's incredible three-storey igloo and tavern.
 
^Pretty harsh words... what have you got against China?

I don't deny the fact that China has a poor track record on human rights with its political and religious persecutions, it has a massive rich-poor gap leaving large numbers of people living in terrible conditions, and it generates massive amounts of pollution and environmental damage (not to mention that a lot of its urban planning and architecture looks pretty bad from a North American or European perspective), but the above description of China isn't very accurate. I've been to various places in China in the past and I never saw any scenes like that.
 
A "poor record on human rights" is a tidy euphemism for massive injustices being committed on an ongoing basis. In a society without freedom and a government without accountability it is impossible to know the extent of it. It's my firm belief that it is truly horriffic.

I recently watched a documentary where famous photographers talked about their experiences shooting important world events and conflicts. The famous shot of the student standing in front of a tank in Tianenmen Square was shown to a group of university students at the best university in China, in Beijing, and not one had the first clue what it was about. They didn't even know it was China. A Google search of Tianenmen Square in China brings up tourist maps. That's a joke, and a tragedy of the highest order.

People are so excited and fascinated by the great "Rise of China" that they throw around double-digit growth figures and gush about huge towers and dams. I think a country's record on human rights is a much better measure of its greatness.

I am under no illusions that Canada gets everything right, but I am quite certain that China gets a lot of things very, very wrong.

P.S. - I have also heard that it is very difficult for foreigners to access the most abused parts of rural China, especially journalists. That's why the estimated tens of thousands of armed clashes (and growing steadily each year) between rural residents and government troops go unreported. Don't know if you would be considered a foreigner or not.
 
If you havent been there and spent a fair bit of time in a country it is really hard to comment. No offence, but a couple documentaries doesnt make any one an expert on anything. I'm trying not to come off argumentative - just that I spent a couple years in E. Asia and my opinions changes quite a bit from when I left university.
 
Actually, the average person in China has greatly benefited in the past 20 years under this regime. They can now afford a TV and a fridge and live better lives that might not even materialize had the government been toppled in 1989. Thankfully a strong central government has resulted in a continuous strive for economic reform. Democracy and capitalism aren't always a cure-all for everything. Look at the mess Russia is in.

The average person is also not subject to the human rights abuses people hear in the press. Everyone can live normal lives and the government doesn't have the time to snoop on every one of the 1.3 billion population. We hear a lot about Guantanomo but I doubt the average American will live that kind of life.
 
"I think the current tallest building there is Anuk's incredible three-storey igloo and tavern."

Actually, the tallest building in Nuuk is six stories. I saw it in a documentary.
 
I never claimed to be an expert on China. What my post didn’t say is that I am pretty well-read and well-travelled by most standards. I too spent a couple of years in East Asia after university, though not China. But that doesn’t make me an expert, either. Lots of people have done that.

The point is that a person could live somewhere their whole life and be totally clueless about what’s really going on there. Unfortunately, most people on the planet are in that situation. They don’t have the luxury of knowing much beyond their immediate sphere. They are too caught up in trying to survive. Remember, even today only about 16 percent of the world has access to the internet (roughly).

Just the same, a person could have read 50 books and hundreds of articles, talked to people and yes – even watched many documentaries - on a place and never been there, but have an excellent grasp of what is happening.

To discount an example I used because I saw it on a documentary is a mistake. I happen to believe in the power of journalism, including documentaries. They are a great way to show the world what is happening inside it. They can show you a new side of things you thought you knew. I watch documentaries about Canada all the time that teach me things I never knew and I've lived here for pretty much my whole life.

Looking back on it, I was a bit harsh on China, but some of what I’ve heard, read and seen about China troubles me deeply. I know they have made a lot of positive steps too. Still, seeing those university students’ blank faces when shown the picture of the man and the tank in Tianenmen Square was telling. It’s also something you would probably never see even if you lived in China, because you wouldn’t have thought to do it.

Be sure of this: There will always be someone who knows more than you about any given topic, but that doesn't mean your opinion is worthless. Mpolo, no offence to you either, but I'm sure there are people who know even more than you do about China. That doesn't mean what you said is wrong.
 
Still, seeing those university students’ blank faces when shown the picture of the man and the tank in Tianenmen Square was telling.

It's also telling that pretty much everyone in the West recognizes that image immediately. It says a lot about the power of images, and the degree to which this particular image was disseminated in that time when communist governments were cracking left and right.
 

Back
Top