News   Nov 01, 2024
 2K     13 
News   Nov 01, 2024
 2.3K     3 
News   Nov 01, 2024
 712     0 

Ontario to Streamline EA Process

A

AlvinofDiaspar

Guest
From the Star:

Ontario to speed eco-study process
Plan streamlines eco-study process Goal to get transit,
dumps built faster
Jun. 7, 2006. 05:37 AM
KERRY GILLESPIE
QUEEN'S PARK BUREAU

The province wants to make it easier for municipalities and private companies to overcome the not-in-my-backyard syndrome and build environmentally sound landfills and incinerators.

Yesterday, the province released proposals to streamline the environmental assessment process for large infrastructure projects like highways, transit lines, landfills and incinerators.

"Everyone involved knows that the current environmental assessment process can be slow, often confusing and costly.

"We need to be able to say yes more quickly to green-light projects that are environmentally protective, necessary and constructive, and no to projects that are neither environmentally responsible nor viable," Environment Minister Laurel Broten said.

Ontario is in the midst of a waste-disposal crisis, with municipalities and businesses, sending nearly 4 million tonnes of garbage to Michigan each year because there is nowhere to put it here.

Municipalities face stiff opposition from local residents when they try to site a landfill or incinerator and have long been asking the province to help by fixing the assessment process, which is supposed to measure the potential environmental effects of a project.

"It is not uncommon for the environmental assessment process to be used as a mechanism to block a project; there's no doubt about it," Broten said, adding that the proposed changes would make it clear the process is about finding the best scientific solution and not about building a consensus.

The provincial proposals, which will undergo public consultation over the next few months, could reduce the average length of time to build a new landfill from five years to 3.5 to four years, a highway from five years to three years and a transit line from four years to 1.5 to two years, according to the environment ministry.

The government seems to be on the right track but the lack of detail makes it impossible to say just how effective the proposed changes will be, some municipalities and private waste management players said.

AoD
 
Thanks for the article AoD.

I think they should streamline the environmental assessment process for highways and transit lines. Landfills and incinerators really stink, look bad and well, i'm sure I've said enough.

I know highways/transit create pollution too, but highways and transit are essential, and need to be developed quicker than it is now.
 
thenay:

I don't really agree with shortening the EA process for highways (400 series anyways), for the simple reason that the planning horizon tends to be quite long and they bring along a multiplicity of environmental issues. The EAs for LRT should be much shorter than subways as well, especially if they run along existing right of ways.

AoD
 
I think streamlining the EA process is probably a bad idea in many cases. I agree that EAs for streetcars in existing right of ways should be quick but freeways and roads where none existed before should be a thorough examination. If there are parts of the landscape which are environmentally sensitive it needs to be considered. Fast tracking landfills? That sounds a little scary. Miscellaneous waste shouldn't be put just anywhere. I hope any streamlining is getting rid of bureaucracy rather than impacting the quality of the assessment.
 
I know highways/transit create pollution too, but highways and transit are essential, and need to be developed quicker than it is now.

It's weird reading that the week of the 35th anniversary Stop-the-Spadina celebrations...
 
My first question is how long is the Ontario EA process relative to other jurisdictions?

My second question is how is the quality of Ontario projects relative to other jursidictions and hence has our EA process made any difference?

My third question is does the EA process impact project costs and if so is this justified relative to its benefits or would potential savings be better spent on the project if simple streamlined manditory requirements were imposed on a project up front?
 
An EA for a streetcar. Light rail on a street. With cars.

Damn right it should be streamlined.
 
There should be no EA for LRT's on streets in the first place because buses don't require one in the first place.

Buses cannot carry the ridership like a LRT can in the first place.

Toronto had 3 times the tracks that exist today and there was no EA when they were build.

If an existing road had streetcars on them before, then there is no need for an EA in the first place if TTC wants to relay a line thats has been out of service for the past 30-60 years.

They are more green.

People perfer to ride steel wheels than tires

Most roads in Toronto will never support ROW in the first place unless you take a lane of traffic of it. ....................What........................What do I hear...............NIMBY........................I want a road to drive my SUV on.
 

Back
Top