News   Aug 23, 2024
 1.2K     0 
News   Aug 23, 2024
 1.8K     4 
News   Aug 23, 2024
 546     0 

Kettle meet Pot: Bush and Clinton speak in Toronto.

jade_lee

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
584
Reaction score
0
As we are all aware Bush has been welcome to speak in Toronto along wtih the 42nd president of the United States Clinton. I can only wonder what both of these guys have to say. It should be interesting to read what the journos have to say about their "conversation". As a Canadian I do not appreciate the welcome mat rolled out for the likes of Bush unless he intends to speak about his failed war (the occupation of both Iraq and Afghanistan) honestly and I know that isn't about to happen any day soon. Clinton needs to speak more candidly about his knowledge of events unfolding around the world as well.
 
I went down to the Convention Centre; how could I not? And I stood on the side of the street with a bunch of other people, waved my placard and demanded Bush's arrest as a war criminal. Bush and Clinton are two old slappers trying to turn as many tricks as they can before moving on to the next town. And like the true pros that they are, they got paid up front. They got paid a lot. Judging from what I heard on the news, the johns got off on what they offered.
 
I find it hilarious that BILL CLINTON didn't know that you'd need a passport to cross the border. His wife is Secretary of State. She clearly knows and has been talking about beefing up the northern border. So I can't say I believe Clinton that he just found out yesterday
 
No.

My reference was to W.'s questionable capacity to speak.
 
Bush, Clinton, Obama, they are all the same to me.

I second that. At least the first two weren't as damaging to Canada and its interests. Obama could well prove to be the most dangerous president to Canadian interests in the modern era. The whole thickening border is a sign of things to come. His protectionist tendencies are also starting to act up. And his administration is refusing to drop its claims on our Arctic areas. His dim-bulb Homeland secretary is also proposing to partially militarize the Great Lakes by deploying heavily armed Coast Guard in those waters. He may be great for the US and the world, but he's not showing a lot of love to Canada.
 
^And the trouble is many Canadians don't fully realize this yet.
 
Tickets didn't even sell out for the event.:D i know they charged insane prices, rumor was these guys get $200 thousand a piece for yapping on stage:mad:
 
I thought I found this on UT, but then realized it was actually from a friend's link on FB:

New York Times said:
May 29, 2009, 1:10 pm
Toronto’s Hot Ticket: 42 and 43
By Jim Rutenberg

TORONTO — George W. Bush and Bill Clinton are on stage here tonight for an event that promises to be odd spectacle of presidential history — a for-profit forum featuring the two most recent occupants of the Oval Office.

The two agreed to the event several weeks ago when a pair of young Canadian promoters who specialize in big-ticket events featuring former world leaders approached them to do it.

Though no one will say what they are being paid, their fees have been estimated to be at least six figures. (Ticket prices started at roughly $200, and 6,000 people are expected at the event, which is being held at the convention center here.) But, each man has ample avenues to make money. And that they agreed to do it is also an indication of the strange-bedfellows friendship that has sprung up between the former political foes who now make up half of the exclusive “Ex-Presidents’’ club.

Mr. Clinton himself says it would be hard for him to have imagined when he handed the keys to the White House over to Mr. Bush, a period marked by mutual animosity between their respective staffs and, ultimately the two men.

As he told Peter Baker in an article in this coming Sunday’s New York Times magazine, the tensions actually boiled over in a discussion between the two men: “I had a talk with him about it one day, a real frank talk, because they were being rough,” Mr. Clinton told Mr. Baker. “I told him that I understood how he felt, and it didn’t bother me. I liked the fact that he loved his father and that I felt a great affection for his father, too. But I said: ‘I’ll tell you what, I’ll make you a deal. If you ever need me to do something for you and I can do it consistent with my conscience, I’ll do it.’ ”

Mr. Bush, of course, did that in 2005, teaming him up with his father, former President George H.W. Bush, on the relief efforts following the Asian tsunami and Hurricane Katrina, and, in Mr. Clinton’s telling, after that “He would call every now and then. We would talk. I just made it a project. I wanted to figure him out and get to know him.”

For his part, Mr. Bush was said by former aides to have been touched by the respect and affection Mr. Clinton showed for his father, and by the generosity Mr. Clinton showed in helping him prepare for his post presidency, including at secret White House lunches that never leaked into news reports.

As Mr. Bush settles into life as a private citizen in Dallas, Mr. Clinton is continuing to keep tabs on him, he told Mr. Baker in an interview.

“I called him the other day to see how he’s doing,’’ he said, adding, “He seemed happy as a clam. I’ll be interested to see what he does.”

This is not to say there will not be ample room for disagreement today. There will be, and it remains a question whether they can get away with a show of general geniality when the crowd has paid so much money in expectation of at least a few fireworks.

Mr. Clinton has spent plenty of time on the stump as an ex-president, while Mr. Bush has only lately gone on the circuit.

Appearing in Michigan on Thursday night, he said that the harsh and now hotly disputed interrogation techniques he approved for suspected terrorists in 2001 were cleared by his lawyers and were in line with what he believed he had to do to avoid a repeat of the September 11 terrorist attacks.

“I made a decision within the law to get information so I can say, I’ve done what it takes to do my duty to protect the American people,” he said in a speech in Benton Harbor, to the Economic Club of Southwestern Michigan. Our colleagues at the Detroit Free Press, who were there, report that Mr. Bush added, “I can tell you, the information gained saved lives.”

(© New York Times)
 
Last edited:
And this is the actual thing:

Bush-Clinton Policy Talk Strikes a Congenial Tone

30bush.xlarge1.jpg

Former Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton appeared together Friday for the first time as Frank McKenna, a former Canadian ambassador to the United States, moderated a talk on global affairs in Toronto. The two were paid $150,000 each.


Published: May 29, 2009
TORONTO — Former President Bill Clinton really misses the presidency. “All of a sudden nobody plays a song,” he told an audience here on Friday, referring to “Hail to the Chief,” the anthem played at presidential events.

Former President George W. Bush hardly misses it at all. “Free at last,” he proclaimed before the same crowd at the Metro Toronto Convention Center. “I like being in Texas, and I do not miss the spotlight.”

But that was practically where the differences stopped as the two former presidents appeared for the first time on a stage together to discuss national and international policy. Each earned more than an estimated $150,000 for the appearance.

Some 6,000 people — or their corporate employers — paid from $200 to $2,500 to attend the event, a rare chance to see two former presidents, who served in succession, square off from opposite sides of the political spectrum.

What they got instead, while no less historic, was a glimpse of the strange-bedfellows-for-the-moment friendship between the two men, once bitter rivals.

Mr. Clinton made it clear from the start that he would avoid any major clashes with Mr. Bush, telling the crowd that the agreed-upon moderator, Frank McKenna, the former Canadian ambassador to the United States, would try to meet their expectations by turning the convention hall into a gladiators’ coliseum, but “we’ll do our best to thwart them.”

And as they settled into overstuffed chairs, Mr. Bush and Mr. Clinton became something of an ex-presidents’ support group, avoiding direct critiques of each other, or, for that matter, their future club member, President Obama (“I want you to understand that anything I say is not to be critical of my successor,” Mr. Bush said, “there are plenty of critics in American society.”)

When Mr. Clinton said one of his biggest regrets was the lack of United States action during the mass killings in Rwanda, saying “I have no defense,” Mr. Bush responded, “I think you’re being a little tough on yourself.” He added that Mr. Clinton’s lament that he should have sent troops ignored the fact that such deployments are not so simply done.

When Mr. Bush, in response to a question from Mr. McKenna — who shared his question topics with the former presidents beforehand — defended his policy toward the Darfur region of Sudan, Mr. Clinton got his back, in return. “I think he did about all he could do,” he said.

When Mr. McKenna raised the issue of Mr. Clinton’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy dealing with gay men and lesbians in the military, Mr. Bush said, “President Clinton handled it the right way.”

Mr. Clinton, however, said he no longer supported the policy and said his views on same-sex marriage, which he has opposed, were evolving.

And the two men had slightly different views on the trade embargo on Cuba. Mr. Bush made clear, gently, that he is less open to the opening of relations than Mr. Obama, and Mr. Clinton said he wanted to believe better relations were possible, joking that his view was “more like that of the current secretary of state,” his wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

If there was anything that even bordered on a sharp exchange, it was the discussion over Iraq.

Mr. Clinton said he would have preferred for Mr. Bush to have given weapons inspectors more time in Iraq before invading and, in the meantime, “concentrated on Afghanistan.”

Mr. Bush said, with a hint of irritation, “I don’t buy the premise that our attention was distracted,” a rejection of the argument that the Iraq war came at the expense of progress in Afghanistan. Neither war was popular with the hundreds of protesters outside the center, though most of their vitriol was directed at Mr. Bush.

Afterward, even audience members who said they were awed by the experience of watching two former United States presidents on stage at the same time expressed surprise at the level of congeniality.

Indeed, though rarely reported upon, relations between the two men had begun to thaw significantly midway through Mr. Bush’s second term, after Mr. Bush teamed up Mr. Clinton and his father, the first President George Bush, on relief efforts after the tsunami in Asia and then, Hurricane Katrina.

Aides to Mr. Bush said he warmed to Mr. Clinton as his predecessor formed an affectionate bond with his father.

Mr. Clinton, meanwhile, offered frequent advice, sneaking into the White House for a secret lunch as early as 2007 to discuss Mr. Bush’s postpresidential plans.

(© New York Times)
 
how much did it cost us in security?

Probably not much. They are former Presidents now. They do get their own secret service security details in retirement. I don't imagine they'd need much beyond that.

I don't why some are surprised that these two get along (reading the tone of some of the articles). I would figure that nothing would bond two individuals like having experienced the Presidency. After all, the only person could ever comprehend what a President went through would be another President. I can even see Obama being a lot more sympathetic to Bush in a few years.
 

Back
Top