News   Jun 25, 2024
 1.4K     1 
News   Jun 25, 2024
 1K     0 
News   Jun 25, 2024
 1.7K     3 

George Smitherman's Heritage Platform

dahusbandofbath

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 16, 2009
Messages
114
Reaction score
132
I was very pleased to read George Smitherman's Heritage platform as reported in the Globe and Mail today. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...vation-can-coexist-smitherman/article1690670/

It was the following paragraphs, in particular, that I found noteworthy:
"The former provincial energy and infrastructure minister’s plans include beefing up the city’s heritage enforcement, adding tax incentives to encourage property owners to maintain their buildings, and penalizing them financially if they don’t.

“Where someone owns heritage properties and doesn’t take care of them, we can bring the force of government ... to create a punitive approach as required to make sure that appropriate protection is given to heritage buildings.â€

He said he’d also encourage “heritage shopping districts†throughout the city, and enforce the idea of natural heritage when it comes to protecting the city’s parks and ravines. He said he’d like to see an “early-warning system†in place that would get heritage and fire officials to monitor older buildings and ensure those with historic value are kept in good repair."

I lived in Munich for a year. I just don't recall seeing unmaintained buidlings anywhere. Not every buidling in Munich is a masterpiece by any means, but they are consistantly clean and in good repair from top to bottom (not just at street level as we so often see in Toronto!)

Even if all the street beautification plans were cancelled in this city, simply replacing the old windows, repainting the trim and re-shingling the rooves of all of our pre-WWII buildings would have a MASSIVE impact on the beauty of our city.
 
He's got my vote! Well, he most likely had my vote anyway.
 
The first property owner upon whom "the force of the law" ought to be brought is the owner of this building on the SE corner of Danforth Ave & Broadview that houses the Yoga Sanctuary: http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&sour...TQmpZurPl0tU_D8I9VSLQ&cbp=12,131.67,,0,-11.02 WHAT IS THAT ADDITION ON THE ROOF???? This buidling forms the southern half of the gateway to Greektown. It's an extremely visible and potentially iconic building. That cinderblock addition on the roof with steel poles sticking out of it is an ABOMINATION! Here's another building on the Danforth worthy of vitriol: http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&sour...d=JP0eRauOQ9moaoCkd-pjQw&cbp=12,2.33,,0,-17.5
WTF?
 
Last edited:
Owners of any building should keep up with maintenance anyways. Glad to see heritage getting some love.
 
Heritage is a huge issue and will only get bigger as we move further into the future. Hopefully these weren't just some thoughts provoked by the heritage debate tonight, but rather something Smitherman strongly believes in.
 
The first property owner upon whom "the force of the law" ought to be brought is the owner of this building on the SE corner of Danforth Ave & Broadview that houses the Yoga Sanctuary: http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&sour...TQmpZurPl0tU_D8I9VSLQ&cbp=12,131.67,,0,-11.02 WHAT IS THAT ADDITION ON THE ROOF???? This buidling forms the southern half of the gateway to Greektown. It's an extremely visible and potentially iconic building. That cinderblock addition on the roof with steel poles sticking out of it is an ABOMINATION! Here's another building on the Danforth worthy of vitriol: http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&sour...d=JP0eRauOQ9moaoCkd-pjQw&cbp=12,2.33,,0,-17.5
WTF?

The first example could still be redeemed with a careful choice of cladding and final details; the second one is just brutal. What an architectural blood bath.
 
I was reading an article about Rossi saying that the historical grants were unfair as more locations in the central city were getting them while the suburbs weren't. I was thinking to myself... most of the suburbs were farmland only 50 years ago... or less. When the 401 was built there was nothing there. If there are only 12 locations getting heritage grants in the city it only makes sense they would be downtown. Even for visibility to tourists it makes sense.
 
I was reading an article about Rossi saying that the historical grants were unfair as more locations in the central city were getting them while the suburbs weren't. I was thinking to myself... most of the suburbs were farmland only 50 years ago... or less. When the 401 was built there was nothing there. If there are only 12 locations getting heritage grants in the city it only makes sense they would be downtown. Even for visibility to tourists it makes sense.

Complaining about the lack of geographically equal distribution of heritage grants when the central city has an extra hundred and fifty years of architectural and cultural history to save. Fail.
 

Back
Top