News   Apr 26, 2024
 1.4K     4 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 321     0 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 877     0 

DNA confirms cow came from Canada

A

Are Be

Guest
&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp
Tuesday » January 6 » 2004

DNA confirms cow came from Canada

&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp
CP

WASHINGTON (CP) -- Two sets of DNA tests in Canada and the United States have confirmed that a Washington state Holstein that tested positive for mad cow disease was born on an Alberta ranch.

Dr. Ron DeHaven, chief veterinarian for the U.S. Agriculture Department, said he was “confident in the accuracy of this traceback.â€

The chief veterinarian for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency said the tests are just one part of a sweeping investigation that will include tracing the feed that likely infected the cow.

The results, announced Tuesday, have been highly anticipated since U.S. officials revealed the country’s first mad cow case Dec. 23.

Days later, officials tentatively pegged the cow’s birthplace and birthdate of April 1997, four months before safety restrictions on the contents of cattle feed were adopted by both countries.

The origin of the feed, which could have come from several sources, is still not known.

The news is a blow to Canada, where the infection of a lone beef cow in May had already thrown the industry into chaos, with losses of more than $1.9 billion Cdn.

The United States, which is tracing 80 other cows imported from the same Alberta herd, may be able to retain a mad cow-free status to soothe anxious trading partners that banned American products after the announcement.

But many in the industry say the cow’s origin really doesn’t matter because the Canadian and U.S. cattle and feed sectors are so integrated after decades of heavy trade.

U.S. officials say they won’t make a decision on whether to reopen the border to live cattle from Canada until the investigation is complete.

Americans banned Canadian cattle and beef products after the May 20 case. Some products from young cattle, thought to be at low risk for carrying the disease, began moving across the border in September.

“Beef continues to be safe, whether this cow originated in Canada or not,†said DeHaven, who noted there is some currency in being able to say it wasn’t American-born.

“Our cattle markets are highly integrated at this time.â€

Mad cow, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, eats holes in the brains of cattle. Humans can develop a deadly form of the disease by eating contaminated beef. During an outbreak in the 1980s, 143 people died of it in Britain.
© Copyright 2004 CP



Copyright © 2004 CanWest Interactive, a division of CanWest Global Communications Corp. All rights reserved.
Optimized for browser versions 4.0 and higher.
 
I have also heard that a link between the Washington dairy cow and the Albertan beef cow has been drawn to a particular Edmonton feed plant. Both cows apparently ate feed produced from the plant before 1997, when anti-mad cow measures were adopted throughout North America.

Mad Cow Disease has a grotesquely long incubation period; something on the order of ten years. We could have instituted every single anti Mad Cow measure there was, and then some, back in 1995, and we'd still have a chance of only now discovering our first cases of the disease.

...James
 
Politics aside, I find it rather gross that one of the suspected reasons for Mad Cow is because cattle are often fed meat-based feed that sometimes comprise of beef itself! I'm no PETA advocate or anything, but I do think that forcing these animals to cannibalism, let alone the risk of spreading disease, is pretty ridiculous.
 
... and tasty!

But, no doubt, feeding herbivore cows -- well--- cows, doesn't pass the smell test.:wtf:
 
"Politics aside, I find it rather gross that one of the suspected reasons for Mad Cow is because cattle are often fed meat-based feed that sometimes comprise of beef itself! I'm no PETA advocate or anything, but I do think that forcing these animals to cannibalism, let alone the risk of spreading disease, is pretty ridiculous."

That practice was banned years ago... 1997, I think.
 
The media coverage of the mad cow crisis has been (surprise) extremely shallow. Very little crititcal investigation of the whole factory-farming phenomenon, which is at the heart of the problem, and the truly interesting ethical dimension of the issue.
 

Back
Top