News   Apr 26, 2024
 1.4K     4 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 321     0 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 877     0 

American "Propoganada" Media Outlets

D

Danny225

Guest
American "Propoganada" Media Outlets

The US government has recently launched a new TV station named “AL Hurra†or the “Free-one†across the whole Arab world, following a radio station and a magazine, to help serve American interests in the region… what do you guys think?

This is their mission statement on the website of the Radio Station:

One of the guiding principles of Radio Sawa is that the long-range interests of the United States are served by communicating directly in Arabic with the peoples of the Middle East by radio.

www.radiosawa.com/english_sp.cfm

www.alhurra.com/
 
BBC Article

US launches Arab TV channel

By Peter Feuilherade
BBC Monitoring



From 14 February, satellite viewers in the Arab world will be able to watch a new US government-funded Arabic-language satellite TV channel called al-Hurra, meaning "The Free One".


The US hopes the channel will be an alternative to al-Jazeera and others
The channel sees its role as promoting democracy and winning over public opinion in the Arab world.

Al-Hurra is aimed at the younger audience which dominates most Arab countries.

The channel will focus on news, current affairs and discussion programmes, but will also carry general interest features on health, entertainment, sports, fashion and science and technology.

It will broadcast via Arabsat and Nilesat satellites and, in a few months, it will also be available over terrestrial transmitters in Iraq.

At its headquarters in Washington, a mixed team of some 200 Arab and US journalists say they will try to harness US production and marketing skills attuned to Arab sensibilities in their output.

They also insist they will be editorially independent.

But critics say the station will find it hard to establish independent credibility as it is being set up with funding from US Congress, which has given al-Hurra a $62m budget for its first year.

Cool response

Washington hopes its latest public diplomacy initiative will succeed as an alternative to pan-Arab satellite television broadcasters such as Qatar-based al-Jazeera or al-Arabiya, which broadcasts out of Dubai.

"Where do they get this stuff from? Why do they keep insulting us like this?

Editorial in Lebanon's Daily Star newspaper
US officials see these stations as being often critical of the US, particularly in their coverage of the US-led war on terror.

But, even before its launch, al-Hurra has provoked distrust and scepticism from the Arab world.

"I have no doubt the new competition will be professional and technically sound," al-Jazeera spokesman Jihad Ballout said.

"But as for changing Arab public opinion about the US, I think it's going to take a little bit more than a new satellite channel to do that."

Syrian newspaper Tishrin was even more blunt.

"This station is part of a project to re-colonise the Arab homeland that the United States seeks to implement through a carrot-and-stick policy," it said.

And Rami Khouri said in Lebanon's Daily Star newspaper that al-Hurra will be "like the US government's Radio Sawa and Hi magazine before it... an entertaining, expensive and irrelevant hoax".

"Where do they get this stuff from? Why do they keep insulting us like this?" he asked.

Hearts and minds

But Professor Hussein Amin at the American University in Cairo said that such criticism may ignite debates so far not seen in the Arab world.


The station is due to go on air on Saturday at 1500 GMT
"This criticism, as harsh as it may be... will open discussions about freedom of speech and expression and also human rights and issues that do not gain full coverage in the Arab media," he said.

US officials are realistic when asked about the prospects for their new satellite television venture.

They admit that, like other US efforts to win Arab hearts and minds, it faces many challenges.

Al-Hurra's critics, meanwhile, say that what the Arab world wants is a significant change in US policies affecting their region, rather than more satellite television diplomacy.
 
Fox News wasn't doing enough to promote the Bush junta's agenda?
 
"what do you guys think?"

Like you said, it's propaganda. It's also patronising and insulting.
 
It's definitely a strange country. Thank god I have satellite access to CBC Newsworld to get a fair perspective of World Events outside the American Propaganda Machine.
 
Since I understand the language... their news segments are beyond disgusting.... they incite hate between the ethnic/religious groups and other Arabs, especially the Iraq one.
They also have a certain level of censorship very common of they very "state-sponsored" / government controlled stations that the US/Britain denounce in the name of "democratic freedom of speech" ... for example,
Soldiers are never called soldiers but Personnel, the other kings/presidents of surrounding countries a.k.a puppet dictators of the surrounding countries are often praised and shown as brilliant heroes, furthermore, they are very anti-Democrats stations...
They go on and on on Bush's/ Republican's greatness and achievements ... as if their only reason for existence is to be the saviours of the Arabs, keep them safe, and insure their prosperity and ever-lasting happiness
 
Propaganda Techniques
From The Imperial War Museum Website

Techniques The axis below, taken from Professor Hugh Rank's "Intensify/Downplay Schema", is a useful tool for looking at the media coverage of war and propaganda material.

axis1.jpg
axis3.jpg
axis4.jpg
axis2.jpg


Intensify own 'good'

Claim that your cause is just.
Talk of defending a way of life, standards of living, rights and freedoms.
Emphasise the threat of losing this way of life.
Rhetoric of the dispossessed - stress the grievances of the people and the threat of continued dispossession.
Language and imagery are used to bond people together: to promote loyalty, unity and pride; to focus energy for action and to stir feelings and trigger action.


Downplay others' 'good'

Play on the ignorance many people have of others' culture, traditions, beliefs and family life.
Ban the music, art, literature and popular culture of the enemy so as to smother the portrayal of positive aspects of those people.
Intolerance: refuse to consider the others' point of view or whether they may have a legitimate grievance or genuine fear .
Disrespect the 'other': do not see them as equals. Mockery and sarcasm used to degrade, belittle, insult or ridicule others.
Abstraction: Use abstract and general language - it is easier to kill 'things' than to kill human beings.


Downplay own 'bad'

Omission: suppress and conceal.
Cover-up own errors or crimes, problems and weaknesses.
Use secrecy and censorship. Pressurise the press to conform to official view. Control internal critics and opposition.
Euphemisms: use mild language to downplay realities of war - see Resources for examples.
Confusion: use of ambiguous, vague and misleading language, unfamiliar words, jargon, etc.



Intensify others' 'bad'

Use words to stir emotions: anger, fear, disgust, resentment.
Use l anguage to incite hatred and legitimise acts of revenge.
Dehumanisation: depict the 'other' as diabolical or inhuman.
Use of atrocity stories.
Warn of the threat posed by the 'other'.
Intensifying fears of the loss of freedoms, possessions or territory.
Intensify the threat of persecution and death - the greater the threat, the more united your people will be against it and the more urgent the successful prosecution of the war becomes.
 
The interesting thing with the US Government, which I cannot get over, is that it can pay for a broadcast network in the arab world, but can't fund a public broadcast network that is competitive against the corporate media in the US itself.

So interesting...
 

Back
Top