|
|
|
Search results
-
Toronto 289 Christie | 34.9m | 10s | Zinc Developments | a—A
Old building. That's the first iteration. From there it went to this: And then to this: @Paclo or @interchange42 can also change the thread title and database: RAW is no longer involved in any capacity. It's all aA now.- ProjectEnd
- Post #105
- Forum: Buildings
-
Toronto Pinnacle One Yonge | 351.85m | 106s | Pinnacle | Hariri Pontarini
Effing April and @kotsy already posting the pic of the year...- ProjectEnd
- Post #9,330
- Forum: Buildings
-
Toronto 4 Gilead Place | 74.48m | 20s | Pearl Group | Turner Fleischer
Constructing?- ProjectEnd
- Post #23
- Forum: Buildings
-
Toronto 1705 Weston Road | 147.37m | 43s | Altree | Graziani + Corazza
"Architecture" is generous...- ProjectEnd
- Post #41
- Forum: Buildings
-
Dundas West/ Bloor Mobility Hub +interconnected hub network (Metrolinx)
So in future, if you got off a car at the north end of the platform, you'll have to walk an extra half kilometer to get to the tunnel and back if you wanted to get to Wallace Avenue? Where previously you'd be walking about 80m?- ProjectEnd
- Post #679
- Forum: Transportation and Infrastructure
-
Toronto King-Bathurst Transit Oriented Community: North Site | 88.9m | 25s | Infrastructure ON | SvN
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA...- ProjectEnd
- Post #16
- Forum: Buildings
-
Toronto Union Park | 303.33m | 71s | Oxford Properties | Hariri Pontarini
Nobody's denying that buildings evolve through the process, it's your blunt claims that things get "chopped down" and / or "degraded" by a "wack job" at "City Hall" that bely your complete ignorance of the political and planning processes to approval.- ProjectEnd
- Post #2,426
- Forum: Buildings
-
Loblaws Redevelopment (10 Lower Jarvis Street, Choice Properties REIT, ?s, ?)
It's not just the land value though, it's also the income value of the asset. A typical Loblaws brings in so much NOI it makes taking them offline an almost nonstarter. This is the reason Choice exists: to increase the nominal paper value of the property while protecting the underlying asset...- ProjectEnd
- Post #61
- Forum: Buildings
-
Mississauga M3 at M City | 260.29m | 77s | Rogers Real Estate | Arcadis
Another view: And another:- ProjectEnd
- Post #1,028
- Forum: Buildings
-
-
Multiplexes
No, the success of the multiplex project writ large is going to be on how these things can fit into existing neighbourhoods. It really doesn't matter if folks on UT think they're fine, if you know the multiplex regulations, you know how this one was done and calling this much attention to it is...- ProjectEnd
- Post #396
- Forum: Buildings
-
Toronto Union Park | 303.33m | 71s | Oxford Properties | Hariri Pontarini
\/- ProjectEnd
- Post #2,422
- Forum: Buildings
-
Multiplexes
Ha ha yep it was on in the burger spot tonight. It’s wild the city / province / anyone can’t seem to just revoke their HCRA license…- ProjectEnd
- Post #395
- Forum: Buildings
-
Toronto Marlow | 113.41m | 33s | Fitzrovia | Turner Fleischer
Second last crane gone here today, @Paclo- ProjectEnd
- Post #317
- Forum: Buildings
-
Toronto Union Park | 303.33m | 71s | Oxford Properties | Hariri Pontarini
Tell me you know nothing about this without telling me you know nothing about this...- ProjectEnd
- Post #2,420
- Forum: Buildings
-
Toronto 65 King Street East | 82.9m | 18s | Carttera | WZMH
This was in a closed-ended fund.- ProjectEnd
- Post #614
- Forum: Buildings
-
Toronto Union Park | 303.33m | 71s | Oxford Properties | Hariri Pontarini
It's impressive in its engineering, sure, but it's hardly beautiful, IMO.- ProjectEnd
- Post #2,416
- Forum: Buildings
