News   Jul 12, 2024
 1K     0 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 899     0 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 355     0 

Search results

  1. G

    Toronto Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport | ?m | ?s | Ports Toronto | Arup

    With all due respect, how this will affect Porter's bottom line and their business model is not (and should not be) a criteria the city uses when evaluating this file. The idea that the city should say no because it might change the amount of legroom in the plane is just silly. The market will...
  2. G

    Toronto Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport | ?m | ?s | Ports Toronto | Arup

    I really can't see how they are significantly larger. Even check out the no-jets-TO animation (far from an unbiased source): http://www.nojetsto.ca/size-matters-proposed-jets-twice-heavy-turboprops/ We are talking about a couple meters on each dimension.
  3. G

    Toronto Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport | ?m | ?s | Ports Toronto | Arup

    Not sure if this has been posted before, but here is an interesting youtube video showing what the extended runways would look like (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F78rFghCvYE&feature=youtu.be). It strikes me how marginal the impact is and how the CSeries is so similar in size to the Q400.
  4. G

    Toronto Forma | 308m | 84s | Great Gulf | Gehry Partners

    Long time lurker but I have to comment as city planning's recommendations have absolutely shocked me. I have lost a lot of respect for Keesmaat because of this. A lack of public space? The development is across the street from a park. It also includes lecture and classroom space for OCADU and a...
  5. G

    Toronto Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport | ?m | ?s | Ports Toronto | Arup

    Thanks for the update. Pretty much what I expected.

Back
Top