Search results

Understood, thanks, just as long as there is more capacity.

If this is the case, I don't see how more than 30 minute of service to Kitchener can be implemented. This is a very important corridor for CN.

It is the latter. They'll have at least two tracks unless this is another planning disaster (again).

To add to this, no more transfers at Oshawa Centre to get to the go station by bus.

Thanks! Should have said 15 haha.

Almost 20 years old...

Looks great with the outside styling.

Nice to see this moving along

It's not a great design in my opinion.

Needs way more work.

This site is becoming a condo isn't it?

Thanks for link.

Nice to see !

But this is the truth, this line was originally about NYCC and STC. It's only under the Ford Government that Sheppard/McCowan became a thing. I think 2A is better because they're already digging up to Sheppard on the Bloor Danforth, but if 2B gets a lot of votes at all three engagements...

I'm shocked option 3 is more popular, but that Sheppard/Markham area probably wants RT access. I think people don't wanna transfer at McCowan to go to STC unless there is another incentive for it, which option 3 provides, a one-seat ride across Scarborough. Regarding your question about people...

I think people in Scarborough want 2B and that will be reflected in the survey results. MX has its faults, but people don't want to transfer to go to STC which is what 2A means. I agree with which is why I prefer it. I'm just saying from what the pop-up looked like, 2B is the most popular option.

Things is, you're right but why build Sheppard/McCowan at all? If the people want 2B, why did the province go up to Sheppard on the Bloor Danforth? It's a lack of foresight. People (including this board) were told this would happen but insisted Sheppard/McCowan was a good idea because of...

From tonight. Dennis

Much better design

This has quickly become a landmark downtown imo.