Search results

It's not. It's 344.

If I were to visit, I'll be relived to reassure myself knowing that GO, VIA, and (some) UP Express railcars have washrooms on-board. And the nearby ones by the Food Court, if it ran quick.

They'd just split it and attach another loco onto the six pack on the left. Only thing is though, is that you still require a clean and trip-ready 5A car on both six packs.

That's your cab car.

Unless they're in for repairs/servicing, cleaning, or stored in the mainline underground, they are outside.

This is one of the coach shop storage tracks. This track in particular is mainly for cars queued for repair.

Just passed the Forest Hill station site. All traffic lanes appear to be open on Eglinton, but not on Bathurst. I would surmise because of the holiday season and tomorrow's weather that it's like this for the time being. The temporary bus stops up the hill from Bathurst remain.

I feel they should to modify some elements with said livery on coaches. Change the color of the fleet number. Having white letters on a florescent lime green background is not a visually smart approach; it needs to be a contrast so you can actually see the decals. Bring back the fleet number's...

~18 hours, similar to the other four rapid transit lines. The Testing and Commissioning phase was/is also to have operators simulate service and their timetables. IIRC, overnight service was last recommended (from what I read somewhere) to be operated by an modified 334 Eglinton Blue Night...

Stakeholder. Yeah, that's what I meant. Thanks for the correction and explanation.

Sidetrack for a question here. What exactly entails someone to be a shareholder stakeholder? And how?

I'll take a stab at it. Part of it also, I believe, is that the fiscal year is up, and so it'll be important to remain within the budget and constraints leading up to the deadline (March 31). Not a whole lot of works being awarded out I hear. 🤷‍♂️

(I strongly agree, I was actually more a fan of Jane anyway).

I would also think that future extensions west should include as west as Keele, as Downsview Airport I heard is getting redeveloped at some point. It would push all the buses going to Sheppard West now make shorter and more localized services to a subway, and I would have it go on a straight...

Trannsee is no different. I just went out to catch a 332 earlier, and the bus was supposedly two minutes away, and two minutes away, and seconds away, where it disappeared and also supposedly made a detour (collision-related) from a vantage point where I could have told myself it was doing or...

Again??? Second time today. I got caught in the first one this morning around 10:00. It was the entire line (despite the ATC being to Eglinton-ish) at first, then within that disruption, they called out for no subway service between Sheppard West and Wilson. Eventually service resumed...

Mildly disappointed with what I saw here. not so much a missed, but an ignored opportunity.

I would surmise only during the rush, every other or third bus will be turned back if full separation is the course. Off-peak can and should work itself out in the scheduling/frequency detail, where a few minutes' adjustment could be a thing, here and there, to standardize the interlining...

Chiming in late, from what I recall reading, there is an island bus loop planned for Cummer/Drewry for both routes to service west of Yonge. So, I think they may remain separate... likely interline, with some exceptions due to the differences in ridership. But yes, anything for Finch to access...

Concept 3 I support. One bus for the whole segment is essential, even if not everyone rides it. The others supplement service in key areas along the way, but are targeted for those who could use less transfers to destinations away from Dundas (especially en masse). Service can be adjusted...