Search results

True... I'm making the assumption they owned that land. I never considered that they might be leasing it.

I wasn't suggesting they got the Green P sites for nothing... I'm just wondering what the city got in return for them?

What is the city getting for letting them appropriate these two parking lots? Did I miss something?

I like the guy leering at the two women... must be fun to make these renders

I don't totally disagree with his point... but there's a lot of things Toronto used to do badly that it does better now. As far as I know, the city has hundred of millions in the Parkland Acquisition Fund that has to be spent on things like this. Could really be a great site for a mini-square...

Got it from here: http://www.world-architects.com/architecture-news/headlines/Four_Finalists_for_Pershing_Square_Redesign_Unveiled_5964

Clarence Square is inhospitable... I don't know why. It's not welcoming. It's not very used. St. Andrew's on Adelaide is basically a big dog park. I'm surprised the city didn't buy the building since they own half that mini-block anyways. For $20 million I think I would have. Here's a couple...

Long time lurker... I've been through the park, I just don't like it for some reason. Plus I'm always going north... rarely south of King.

First post. I live across the street and can tell you a public space would be great. I actually talked to the Councillor about this a year ago. It would be very unique in Toronto, as you have historic building on the other three corners. The worst thing would be to fill this in... There's almost...