Search results

Well @UtakataNoAnnex, the jury isn't out, it has decided. We've put up front page story here about it. Frankly I'm glad they are not renaming the street (at least for the time being), the amount of disruption would be huge for that, and probably create far more ill-will than the four things...

Let me reiterate, we will not be throwing the term "woke" around here. It does nothing to promote discussion, it only seeks to inflame. Actual discussion does not reduce any opposition to a catch-all term that's been appropriated by an intolerant faction of the wider society to describe anything...

You're allowed to disagree, you're allowed to discuss, but the way that "woke" is being used is dismissive and disrespectful, and it's not going to get you any points 'round these here parts. So go ahead and press your points, but don't spark it with a word that is meant to trigger others. 42

If you continue to troll "woke," trying to provoke a fight, you'll soon be greeted by a disinvitation to the party here. 42

Yeah, that doesn't sound so good. The Chicken Parmigiana is a better bet there. 42

Mamma Martino's is the Italian version of Swiss Chalet: you don't go there for fine dining, you go there for cheap and cheerful, and they have plenty of both. Their salad dressing, in the meantime, makes me sing. 42

The Committee of Adjustment granted the ask yesterday, and we have a front page story today. https://urbantoronto.ca/news/2023/12/artistry-condos-rising-near-ago-rippling-balconies-now-32-storeys.54766 42

I would assume what was unsaid was "until the end of their current lease". I wonder if they'll end up in the T3 complex just down the street?! 42

We handed out this year's Jasonzed Photography Award last week to @AlbertC, and you can read all about why, here! https://urbantoronto.ca/news/2023/12/albertc-recipient-urbantorontos-2023-jasonzed-photography-award.54417 42

Does that mean that it is down to 1 crane then? BTW, it's best to @Paclo for 905 crane news! 42

This thread is good for the teardown pics, but so is the other one, no worries! 42

…it's a slow and payneful process. 42

Here's your summary: https://www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions/OLT-23-000684-NOV-30-2023.pdf 42

If there are any plans to redevelop here, the City will require rental replacement units of essentially the same size and the same number of bedrooms, so as discussed earlier in this thread, with the current separation distances between the buildings, it makes redevelopment here very tricky and...

Medical tech has been advancing faster than anything over the last decades, so it's quite possible that the doctors etc here are moving to facilities that are better set up for new communications and power needs anyway. Meanwhile, the developers here wouldn't be proposing this if they didn't...

Database file (and thread title) updated only in regards to the new height: 256.9m and 72s. https://www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions/OLT-22-004116-NOV-01-2023.pdf plus correction noted in https://www.omb.gov.on.ca/e-decisions/OLT-22-004116-NOV-15-2023.pdf 42

This is simply a proposal at this point, and it could be years before this begins, it's too early in the process to say at this point. 42

The windows are too large in many Toronto condos. And then there are other cities. 42

Its redevelopment was stymied by City refusal to upzone it enough to cover the cost of developing it. Now that we're in a weird time for the economies of building again, many sites that aren't obvious moneymakers for their owners are on the block again. Poor timing here! BTW, thank you for...

I've made them bring it back. You'll see it on College in Toronto again next time you're there. 42