Search results

Hoping that WHAT would be approved at City Council? This building IS approved, is it not?

There can be many reasons for a motion to be held. Often, a key piece of documentation is missing, or something has/is about to change in the proposal. I'm on one of the City of Toronto committees (Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee), and it even happens there.

EWWW! Where's that? Astana?

Halle...freakin'...luiah!!

They will survive if the right trees were chosen and they're properly cared for. Works great elsewhere, including condo roofs. The question is more about one thing: will the City of Toronto actually maintain them?

Sorry, but what heritage? They're all forgettable-to-ugly buildings.

Hardly. It has simply ceased to look like a pencil on steroids.

No highrise, unless something has changed. Twins of the first phase, just a story taller (so 14 stories).

I knew that you didn't count those, and I understand the reasoning. I was just trying to hold out hope of a (tiny) height increase!

Eighty SIX stories, not 85? Cool!

Maybe because of the fancy wine drinkers of Yorkville? I think it's a stupid name too, but I'm trying to understand the logic model that got them to choose this name.

Thanks to you and Northern Light for the clarifications!

I only asked because of the last pic before my comment. The Emergency sign on the NE corner of the new Bond Street wing...

So the Emerg is to move yet again? Wow!!

Is it not supposed to be re-clad as part of the building addition? I'm sure I remember reading that, quite some time ago.

The 100 Metre List data for this building is still at the old 340+ m height, and it seems riddled with errors and omissions. Is it no longer being maintained? @DonValleyRainbow

This list seems to have several clear errors, and hasn't been updated for several months.