Getting there. By the end of the year all will be forgiven.
Not really, most of that time was construction, they only started testing the vehicles about three years ago and had numerous software updates during that time.Ten years and they didn't have time to figure it out?
The acceleration still seems slow?
I'm glad they move to a lagging left, it's more efficient than a transit only inserted phase. However if a train arrives after the lagging left phase started, they should insert a transit phase to allow trains first.The acceleration still seems slow?
they are also made as make shift bunkers... lolso much wasted space (and $$) in those tunnels..
Tighter tunnels causes things like the air pressure changes that blow the station doors open at places like Sherbourne and Castle Frank when a train arrives, on top of just being less safe for those who may need to do maintenance when trains are running..so much wasted space (and $$) in those tunnels..
Fyi, the most recent tune extension in London, the northern line to Battersea, was 17ft in diameter. Fairly certain the Elizabeth line is similar. https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/p...for-northern-line-extension-tunnelling-machinPerhaps in England, they follow this construction standard:
"This is an announcement from Genetic Control
It is my sad duty to inform you of a four-foot restriction on humanoid height...
It's said now that people will be shorter in height
They can fit twice as many in the same building site"
- Genesis
Do lagging left turns even create significant delay for cars? They get the same amount of time, just in a different place in the signal cycle.
there are currently speed restrictions though all intersections.The acceleration still seems slow?
As many have noted, a lagging left does nothing inherently to speed up transit. Just as the left turn phase is the same amount of time, so is the transit green phase. This is just a re-ordering of phases. If the train arrival at the intersection is randomly distributed, consistently re-ordering phases will not improve the average travel time improvement.Do lagging left turns even create significant delay for cars? They get the same amount of time, just in a different place in the signal cycle.
The implementation they have been testing on Spadina (which is likely the same as on Eglinton) is phase rotation - if it detects an LRV, it rotates the left turn phase to be lagging, but normally operates in the leading phase. This is not lagging or leading left exclusively.As many have noted, a lagging left does nothing inherently to speed up transit. Just as the left turn phase is the same amount of time, so is the transit green phase. This is just a re-ordering of phases. If the train arrival at the intersection is randomly distributed, consistently re-ordering phases will not improve the average travel time improvement.
To be effective, it needs to be dynamic, with phase insertion/red truncation/green extension only when trains are at/approaching the intersection.
There was some discussion on other channels that, at least on Eglinton, the current setup is a consistent lagging left. But I haven't been out there to check myself.The implementation they have been testing on Spadina (which is likely the same as on Eglinton) is phase rotation - if it detects an LRV, it rotates the left turn phase to be lagging, but normally operates in the leading phase. This is not lagging or leading left exclusively.
This is correct. TTC has equipment on order that will enable proper phase rotation at a later date.There was some discussion on other channels that, at least on Eglinton, the current setup is a consistent lagging left. But I haven't been out there to check myself.




