News   Mar 05, 2026
 205     0 
News   Mar 05, 2026
 1K     3 
News   Mar 05, 2026
 458     0 

Toronto Eglinton Line 5 | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx | Arcadis

The acceleration still seems slow?
I'm glad they move to a lagging left, it's more efficient than a transit only inserted phase. However if a train arrives after the lagging left phase started, they should insert a transit phase to allow trains first.

They really need to speed up the speed allowed through the intersection.
 
Here's my ranking of the Line 5 Eglinton artwork:

1. Mount Dennis station
2. Caledonia station
3. Kennedy station
4. Eglinton station
5. Don Valley station
6. Cedarvale station
7. Oakwood station
8. Forest Hill station

Yes, I find text more interesting than abstract art.

How would you rank the Line 5 Eglinton artwork?
 
so much wasted space (and $$) in those tunnels..
Tighter tunnels causes things like the air pressure changes that blow the station doors open at places like Sherbourne and Castle Frank when a train arrives, on top of just being less safe for those who may need to do maintenance when trains are running..
 
Perhaps in England, they follow this construction standard:
"This is an announcement from Genetic Control
It is my sad duty to inform you of a four-foot restriction on humanoid height...
It's said now that people will be shorter in height
They can fit twice as many in the same building site"
- Genesis
Fyi, the most recent tune extension in London, the northern line to Battersea, was 17ft in diameter. Fairly certain the Elizabeth line is similar. https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/p...for-northern-line-extension-tunnelling-machin
 
Do lagging left turns even create significant delay for cars? They get the same amount of time, just in a different place in the signal cycle.
As many have noted, a lagging left does nothing inherently to speed up transit. Just as the left turn phase is the same amount of time, so is the transit green phase. This is just a re-ordering of phases. If the train arrival at the intersection is randomly distributed, consistently re-ordering phases will not improve the average travel time improvement.

To be effective, it needs to be dynamic, with phase insertion/red truncation/green extension only when trains are at/approaching the intersection.
 
As many have noted, a lagging left does nothing inherently to speed up transit. Just as the left turn phase is the same amount of time, so is the transit green phase. This is just a re-ordering of phases. If the train arrival at the intersection is randomly distributed, consistently re-ordering phases will not improve the average travel time improvement.

To be effective, it needs to be dynamic, with phase insertion/red truncation/green extension only when trains are at/approaching the intersection.
The implementation they have been testing on Spadina (which is likely the same as on Eglinton) is phase rotation - if it detects an LRV, it rotates the left turn phase to be lagging, but normally operates in the leading phase. This is not lagging or leading left exclusively.
 
The implementation they have been testing on Spadina (which is likely the same as on Eglinton) is phase rotation - if it detects an LRV, it rotates the left turn phase to be lagging, but normally operates in the leading phase. This is not lagging or leading left exclusively.
There was some discussion on other channels that, at least on Eglinton, the current setup is a consistent lagging left. But I haven't been out there to check myself.
 

Back
Top