3Dementia
Senior Member
Maybe I'll get a courtesy call from Homeland Security.oh god, watch the flood of hate come now. lol
Maybe I'll get a courtesy call from Homeland Security.oh god, watch the flood of hate come now. lol
God, you are going to drag us all down with you!!Maybe I'll get a courtesy call from Homeland Security.I'll sing the praises of this democratic meeting place known as UrbanToronto.
![]()
It's fun, however, in reality I still hope for one of the following: a BMO, Bell, National Bank Financial, Manulife, or Desjardins tenancy and logo, whether any of these firms become the major tenant or get there signange put up on the Hub is a whole other thing. But I can keep dreaming and wishing.It's 3D's *thing* - he does silly little photoshops from time to time
Not sure, but they do have several offices across the GTA, which could or maybe should be considered to be rolled into one large building. I don't see the efficiency of any company having multiple locations within a single area. In this case i am referring to the GTA. I know there is a campus in Brampton, there is an office complex near the 401/404/DVP interhcnage and then there's a smaller office across the street from their main offices near Bloor St. Not sure if there are any other locations. The NATO bank would be good as well.^Is Rogers in a position to consolidate?
Rogers (and the other telcos) wouldn't consolidate into trophy space like this - they maintain expensive downtown offices for execs and show, but won't pay for that for the rest of their workforce.^Is Rogers in a position to consolidate? Also might be a good fit for the NATO defence bank if Toronto gets it.
The efficiency is that they're paying north of ~$60 PSF for that Class AAA space downtown versus paying >$20 PSF in satellite markets. The cost savings are immense, not for nothing the convenience offered in having a multi-site network of offices for employees to work from. It works for the likes of Rogers, Bell, and Telus because they are culturally similar organizations with little competition for talent. The banks have to attract talent from all walks of finance, including American firms who can pay top dollar for space, so they're more motivated to spend on expensive financial core real estate.Not sure, but they do have several offices across the GTA, which could or maybe should be considered to be rolled into one large building. I don't see the efficiency of any company having multiple locations within a single area. In this case i am referring to the GTA. I know there is a campus in Brampton, there is an office complex near the 401/404/DVP interhcnage and then there's a smaller office across the street from their main offices near Bloor St. Not sure if there are any other locations. The NATO bank would be good as well.
very in formitive and I understand your point about costs for space downtown vs elsewhere. What are your thoughts on the idea of the other firms I mentioned, a 2nd BMO Manulife, Desjardins Group?Rogers (and the other telcos) wouldn't consolidate into trophy space like this - they maintain expensive downtown offices for execs and show, but won't pay for that for the rest of their workforce.
Their real estate model relies on having multiple satellite offices.
The efficiency is that they're paying north of ~$60 PSF for that Class AAA space downtown versus paying >$20 PSF in satellite markets. The cost savings are immense, not for nothing the convenience offered in having a multi-site network of offices for employees to work from. It works for the likes of Rogers, Bell, and Telus because they are culturally similar organizations with little competition for talent. The banks have to attract talent from all walks of finance, including American firms who can pay top dollar for space, so they're more motivated to spend on expensive financial core real estate.
Commercial leasing tends to be very interconnected and for new buildings 'it's not done until it's all done'.I believe it's been mentioned here that the HUB has some leases already secured, but not an anchor tenant. Does anyone know who the leases are, and if they are able to share that information?
BMO could be a good thought but I'm not familiar with their CRE strategy or financials as of late so can't speak to them. Manulife from what I can tell is consolidating around their campus at Bloor/Yonge. Desjardins is interesting, as they're currently in Telus Tower, but from what I understand they prefer to keep their footprint mostly in Montreal. They'd have to capture large market share to expand significantly in Toronto.very in formitive and I understand your point about costs for space downtown vs elsewhere. What are your thoughts on the idea of the other firms I mentioned, a 2nd BMO Manulife, Desjardins Group?
Plus in the case of Rogers, they own 1 Mt Pleasant. There's basically no chance they decide to replace a building they own with renting one from Oxford.Rogers (and the other telcos) wouldn't consolidate into trophy space like this - they maintain expensive downtown offices for execs and show, but won't pay for that for the rest of their workforce.
Their real estate model relies on having multiple satellite offices.
Manulife consolidating from around the city into a new tower and then having their beautiful building on Bloor converted into an upscale hotel, like a Woldorf Astoria or a Plaza Hotel type, would be a great fit not only for that building but for "Mink Mile" Bloor St., which has very nice hotels in the area as it is.I am not going to identify exactly who is talking to whom about what.
I will say, international banks and fintechs are in play, as are mainline tech firms, and yes, domestic banks too.
There's enough interest to easily fill The Hub, but it's a big commitment, years out, and everyone (including Oxford) wants the best deal they can get. We'll see how it all comes together in due course.