nfitz
Superstar
We did better on Line 4. With actual removable walls rather than just some paint.Why can't we do this here?? (Bus times)
We did better on Line 4. With actual removable walls rather than just some paint.Why can't we do this here?? (Bus times)
That is completely and totally incorrect. The line voltage - 1500Vdc in the case of Ottawa and 750Vdc in Toronto - has no bearing on the onboard traction bus voltage, which is about 480Vac.Its also partly why they are slow on Line 6, undervolted compared to O-Train.
How is this any different than the 30 foot long stickers that were applied to each platform, exactly?hen Helsinki artificially shortened their Metro from 6 cars (135m) to 4 cars (90m) to save 50 million Euros on the Western Espoo extension, at least they put in proper stickers on the platform edge to demarcate the boarding zone:
![]()
Source
![]()
Source
A roll of duct tape along the platform edge would've been better than what we did.
Ottawa got that right with the wall-mounted "Boarding zone/Zone d'embarquement" signage at the underground stations.
Seems like circular stickers similar to the Covid social-distancing ones would've been better.
This, they couldn't even be bothered to mirror the stickers at the termini/side-platforms, so on one side the text is facing you, on the other it's facing the train, which is totally useless.[...] How is this any different than the 30 foot long stickers that were applied to each platform, exactly?
Dan
I finally got the chance to look over this video in full and outside of my phone. It's very obviously either an analog camcorder (from long before 2011) or run through a filter. Tracking lines, the type of over-exposure blooming and the frame artifacts at the bottom just don't happen with digital recording methods; which by 2011 were the norm.Perhaps, though it honestly seems pointless to deliberately downgrade the quality of a video just to make it seem like it's from that era (especially when it's obviously not), downgrading the quality of the video is only subtracting from its value, not adding to it. If anything, it would be far more interesting to watch real footage from the 1980s upscaled to HD/4K.
Eglinton drivers: let's get on those tracks!
Eglinton does its job well![]()
Nice but why does it look like it’s going so slow
Eglinton does its job well![]()
Was thinking the same. It's great to see it beating out the traffic, however, if it were travelling faster it would make more of a statement to drivers.Nice but why does it look like it’s going so slow
They just need one of these.I've been told that Line 5 & 6 use different voltage. So I would think that it's not possible for Alstom Citadis units to run on Line 5?
Initially, it's just leaving Wynford station. After that I don't think it looks that slow - perhaps someone could time it and measure the distance?Nice but why does it look like it’s going so slow
The trains are operated by ATO in the tunnels but manually driven on the surface. There seem to be a different speed limit and acceleration rate allowed when operators driven them vs. ATO driven. We hope they allow them to drive faster soon.Was thinking the same. It's great to see it beating out the traffic, however, if it were travelling faster it would make more of a statement to drivers.
Again, a lot of pointless stuff is done as sheer clickbait. And by claiming to have recorded the video on something from 2011, it obviously has drawn enough attention to get people to promote it as such, even if it's entirely disingenuous.
The YouTube video is my footage.Though the YT video doesn't really make the claim. Maybe @SaugeenJunction was mistaken or making a joke. The YT video had a generic title 'Eglinton Crosstown LRT' and no comments.
From googling I just see the claim on social media posts from beyondfinch, on Reddit and Instagram, a 13s clip and I don't think they have overlapping footage with the YT video. They claimed they used a SamsungGT65.
Here's another user who took pictures using a Sony NEX-3 camera from 2011. https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thr...at-is-now-line-5-eglinton-in-toronto.4829639/
When Helsinki artificially shortened their Metro from 6 cars (135m) to 4 cars (90m) to save 50 million Euros on the Western Espoo extension, at least they put in proper stickers on the platform edge to demarcate the boarding zone:
A roll of duct tape along the platform edge would've been better than what we did.
Ottawa got that right with the wall-mounted "Boarding zone/Zone d'embarquement" signage at the underground stations.
Seems like circular stickers similar to the Covid social-distancing ones would've been better.
I am sure that Alstom would fire up production of the Flexity Freedoms if a large enough order from Toronto/Ontario was requested. Also Hyundai Rotem also makes a similar tram, which seems to have similar door placements, which will be sharing tracks with Flexity Freedoms on the Edmonton Valley Line. Maybe they could make a 5-unit variant? Throw in Ontario assembly to sweeten the deal?If the Flexity Freedom vehicles are no longer available for production, could the line be supplemented by introducing coupled Alstom Citadis units as additional vehicles?
In that scenario, it seems likely that extra bollards would need to be installed at the mid-section where the Citadis cars are coupled. At the same time, would the existing bollards—currently positioned to align with the Flexity Freedom door layout—conflict with the door spacing or boarding areas of a coupled Citadis configuration? Conversely, could any new bollards required for the Citadis interfere with the door placement on the Flexity Freedom vehicles?




