mburrrrr
Senior Member
So I haven't written this off no matter how ill-informed my hopes are here until that fat lady sings.
Whoops, wrong thread.
Hopefully both problems get solved this summer if not sooner.
So I haven't written this off no matter how ill-informed my hopes are here until that fat lady sings.
Just keep in mind that Mr. 42 may be privy to information here that we may not be aware of here....as he maybe closer to the horse's mouth on this. So I am not ruling out this might be a "Done deal, Jim" either.They have also made it clear multiple times that plans can and do change, and seem to be figuring it out as they go along, main examples being the addition of a 106th floor and, later, a full restaurant out of thin air.
no big deal it's only the tallest building in the country that we'll all have to stare at for the rest of our lives!Absolute garbage for a supposed iconic tower, especially one that will be the secondary face to the world after the CN Tower in all photos going forward.
I get money, but have some pride in it.
I think it is was done for the BMU (I think was mentioned), which will probably stick out like a sore thumb similar to Monde
Do we have any renders on how this new look will be lit up at night?
They have also made it clear multiple times that plans can and do change, and seem to be figuring it out as they go along, main examples being the addition of a 106th floor and, later, a full restaurant out of thin air.
Maybe the current BMU design is the issue with a higher glass wall?
View attachment 710022
The bay is starting to freeze over. I assume the wind will die down tonight and @skycandy will be out tomorrow morning with one of his beautiful annual downtown shot from Polson Pier.View attachment 710023
6.8 metres is a lot. it will look terrible guaranteedI would have been out if the weather cooperated (silly Alberta Clipper with its dull snowy sky scapes today). Thinking that Saturday morning may be more interesting with decent potential for Arctic sea smoke over any harbour exposed water, but bloody cold (generally need less than -20C (and that’s not the windchill) for Arctic sea smoke).
As for the mechanical discussion, I feel it won’t be an obvious carbuncle like most other buildings simply due to the relative scale. From @mburrrrr ’s drawing post, it looks to be just under 7 metres on a 352 metre slender building. Not ideal obviously but perhaps not a reason to toss this into the trash bin of woulda shoulda coulda buildings?! I included a cropped image of the drawing below, and also two glowing sunset shots from last evening.
View attachment 710247
View attachment 710248
View attachment 710249
Also, is the final height 428 metres?????![]()