News   Jan 09, 2026
 201     0 
News   Jan 09, 2026
 834     0 
News   Jan 09, 2026
 705     0 

Road Safety & Vision Zero Plan

Here's some good news for Vision Zero in Toronto! Traffic fatalities dropped by half from 78 in 2016 to 39 in 2025! However, it's unknown whether this trend will continue given Doug Ford's speed camera ban.

Breakdown from the dashboard
1767739743707.png

1767739752320.png
 
It seems like Leading Pedestrian Interval is pretty much standard now but what about prohibiting cars from turning right on red? It seems like no-brainer for safety particularly when used in conjunction with the LPI. Is this something that Toronto has to get permission for from Ontario?

 
It seems like Leading Pedestrian Interval is pretty much standard now but what about prohibiting cars from turning right on red? It seems like no-brainer for safety particularly when used in conjunction with the LPI. Is this something that Toronto has to get permission for from Ontario?

Nope, it’s just that “no right-on-reds” is politically unpopular and generally not pushed hard by transportation staff unless paired with bike left-turn boxes (which is a requirement for them.) There really needs to be a bigger movement for them in general.
 
It seems like Leading Pedestrian Interval is pretty much standard now but what about prohibiting cars from turning right on red? It seems like no-brainer for safety particularly when used in conjunction with the LPI. Is this something that Toronto has to get permission for from Ontario?


@H4F33Z above is on point, but let me add to it slightly.

1) Real world example, staff wanted to ban rights on reds on Kingston Road as part of the cycling and other upgrades. The Councillor moved a motion to spike that.

Very hard to pass those in most of the City.

2) While I'm broadly in support of the idea myself, I do not want to note the law of unintended consequences. Banning rights on read can create queuing which impedes buses. If the bus can't pull into its stop, to let passengers on/off, at multiple stops in a row, that can add several minutes of run time and either result in less frequent or more expensive service that is also longer for riders.

There are ways to mitigate that effect, but those too carry controversy (example, making un-regulated intersections (no lights) with major streets RIRO (right in, right out) really helps with flow, but is not popular.
 
@H4F33Z above is on point, but let me add to it slightly.

1) Real world example, staff wanted to ban rights on reds on Kingston Road as part of the cycling and other upgrades. The Councillor moved a motion to spike that.

Very hard to pass those in most of the City.

2) While I'm broadly in support of the idea myself, I do not want to note the law of unintended consequences. Banning rights on read can create queuing which impedes buses. If the bus can't pull into its stop, to let passengers on/off, at multiple stops in a row, that can add several minutes of run time and either result in less frequent or more expensive service that is also longer for riders.

There are ways to mitigate that effect, but those too carry controversy (example, making un-regulated intersections (no lights) with major streets RIRO (right in, right out) really helps with flow, but is not popular.

Yes, this is what I mean. Not a blanket ban for every intersection in the city, but a systematic approach that prioritizes safety (especially for dangerous intersections) and efficiency for all modes. It may also require a rethinking of signals/turning movements in the city and an adoption for right turn signal setups similar to Montreal. The worry is that it may cause unneeded delay for some intersections unless there is a tangible safety benefit. The main danger is that people run crosswalks and treat reds as yield rather than a stop and a NROR sign might not help unless they’re actually looking and a blanket city-wide ban can help with that mentality but it would come with inefficiencies.
 
Nope, it’s just that “no right-on-reds” is politically unpopular and generally not pushed hard by transportation staff unless paired with bike left-turn boxes (which is a requirement for them.) There really needs to be a bigger movement for them in general.
Not popular for drivers. Who don't obey the rules on stopping first on the red, and only then turning when "safe". Banning right turns on red would make it safer for everyone else, though. (The City of Toronto banning right-turns-on-red would likely be be vetoed by Doug Ford.)
 
Is there any more recent data on how many pedestrians are struck by right-turning drivers? vs By left-turning drivers?

I recall data from back when the program started, just wondering if there is anything more recent.

Intuitively, the left turns are riskier because drivers are more likely to leadfoot around a left turn, due to oncoming cars and impatience around bad decisions with too-short gaps in same, and because they have room to accelerate during the turn. The saving grace of right turns from a stop is they are slower speed and less dependent on avoiding oncoming cars.

- Paul
 
Is there any more recent data on how many pedestrians are struck by right-turning drivers? vs By left-turning drivers?

I recall data from back when the program started, just wondering if there is anything more recent.

Intuitively, the left turns are riskier because drivers are more likely to leadfoot around a left turn, due to oncoming cars and impatience around bad decisions with too-short gaps in same, and because they have room to accelerate during the turn. The saving grace of right turns from a stop is they are slower speed and less dependent on avoiding oncoming cars.

- Paul
No, very annoyingly, there isn't with publicly available data. Maybe someone on the Vision Zero team would have access to a different dataset but what is published on the Toronto Police Service website is far from quality data.

In February 2025 I emailed TPS asking when data would get updated for the Pedestrian KSI and was told maybe April and they were waiting on Vision Zero at the City. April rolled right by and nothing, so in October I contacted Vision Zero, and this was their reply;
"The City of Toronto Data & Analytics team is currently in discussions with the Toronto Police on coordinating the transfer of the Killed or Seriously injured dataset publishing authority to the City of Toronto. I do not currently have a timeline as this is a fairly large undertaking."

However, currently a couple sets of data capture some of what you're asking:

Traffic Collisions Open Data which has all collisions by all modes in the City of Toronto since 2014. 19,180 collisions involve at least one pedestrian. Seems to get updated somewhat frequently, every couple months and last update was November 2025. The biggest issue with it is incomplete or missing information. The schema includes, among other properties, date, hour, latitude, longitude, as well as properties to indicate whether an automobile or pedestrian was involved. But it doesn't include fault, actions, or position on the road. Of the 19,180 records involving a pedestrian, 1,494 don't have a lat and long. For the entire 772,516 records, 126,069 don't have a location! A big gap with this data is that each collision only has one record, but doesn't indicate how many people or parties were involved or what the injuries were.

There's another source, Pedestrian KSI which has records going back to 2006, but the most recent record is from December 29 2023. From 2006 - 2023 there are 3,275 records of pedestrians involved in collisions (all modes). The schema includes "manoeuvre", with values including "Turning right" and "Turning left", but the critical piece missing is that this data is only capturing pedestrians who were killed or seriously injured. It does categorize injuries into None, Minimal, Minor, Major, Fatal, and <blank>, but the data very clearly does not include the many incidents involving pedestrians, by which I mean even if you read about a collision reported by the police resulting in a seriously injured pedestrian, it's not necessarily in the data. There isn't a definition about what qualifies for these injuries either. I recall Jess Spieker of Friends and Families for Safe Streets saying that her injury -- broken spine and a brain injury -- wasn't classified by police as "major".

Whether because police aren't providing complete information, or that not all incidents are logged, I am skeptical that a true picture of the pedestrian safety landscape can be painted with this data. In theory it should be very easy to compare data from this data to that of Total Collisions, but it isn't. They each have different unique identifiers and also event ids, so you can't even take a record of a collision in one table and easily find it in the other.

Comparing the two datasets in similar timeframes, 2014-2023, the number of collisions involving pedestrians are wildly different. Total Collisions has 19,180 collisions that involved at least one pedestrian (are they injured, a witness? I don't know), while Pedetrian KSI only has 1,623.

In July 2025 CAA released results from a near miss safety study they commissioned, though it was done in numerous Canadian cities and not just Toronto. I found the results are shocking, beacuse it captured near misses, and these happen all the time, and right turn conflicts happen a lot more than what collisions resulting in injuries might lead one to believe (Toronto numbers below). I wrote a summary about it in this comment.
Here's a link to the study: https://www.caa.ca/app/uploads/2025/06/FINAL-REPORT_CAA-Intersection-Safety-Study_English.pdf

One graph from their results:
Total Pedestrian Conflicts and Breakdown by Vehicle Movement We measured a total of 397,731 pedestrian conflicts. Over 55% of vehicle-pedestrian conflicts occurred between a right turning vehicle and a pedestrian. Conflicts with left turning vehicles ranked second at 33.9%. Taken together, left and right turning movements are responsible for almost 90% of vehicle-pedestrian conflicts, while vehicles going straight through are only responsible for only about 10% of vehicle-pedestrian conflicts.


In any case since I have a database open here's some numbers:

Collisions from 2006 to 2023 in Pedestrian KSI
Turning right: 255
Injuries
None: 249
Minimal: 4
Minor: 2

Turning left: 816
Injuries
None: 771
Minor: 18
Minimal: 14
Major: 11
<blank>: 2

Within the Pedestrian KSI data, here's the breakdown of all injuries (2006-2023)
Minimal: 176
Minor: 222
Fatal: 546
<blank>: 567
Major: 2,626
None: 3,551
 
  • Like
Reactions: PL1

Back
Top