News   Dec 23, 2025
 527     3 
News   Dec 23, 2025
 1.2K     1 
News   Dec 23, 2025
 2K     1 

President Donald Trump's United States of America

Trump_Battleship-poster-defiant-hi-res-2048x1229-1.jpg


Any similarities are purely coincidental.

ZTRiNzI3dTUzCzhJZkh4IHBTbBMgEXZ2J0t0WGYCaGxiEWEcIF8_JjcZIVQuQS8kMx4-VDlfdTUiAGEMeBw-PSEZIhswHD85MAwqVXgLbTA3CHZDZAE_bDREek19CndtYVsvV3sCajFmC3lIflVrZHAU

You know it. This is the most authoritarian loving and Russophilic American administration ever. It's absolutely nuts. And most people have long understood that obsession over weapons size and numbers (instead of quality) was a sign of weakness. There's a reason dictators cave large military parades and the US never did. Strength was implied. If this thing actually gets built, it will mark the start of military decline on top of everything else going down in the US. And most naval analysts I know are still betting this doesn't get built.
 
We can only hope that US defense procurement is slow enough that these never make it off the drawing board before Trump dies, leaves office or gets bored.
 
You know it. This is the most authoritarian loving and Russophilic American administration ever. It's absolutely nuts. And most people have long understood that obsession over weapons size and numbers (instead of quality) was a sign of weakness. There's a reason dictators cave large military parades and the US never did. Strength was implied.
Well said. Same goes for super tall buildings, the US could have made the new WTC the tallest in the world, but IMO decided that’s a petty goal of tinpot oil sheiks and sultans. With the WTC rebuilt strength was implied, no matter its relative height. But now, we have the Germania like mega flexes coming out of the Trump administration.
 
We can only hope that US defense procurement is slow enough that these never make it off the drawing board before Trump dies, leaves office or gets bored.

They cancelled the DDG(X) program to fund this apparently. That's the word going around. If that's true, it's devastating to the US Navy. And will set them back years.
 
They cancelled the DDG(X) program to fund this apparently. That's the word going around. If that's true, it's devastating to the US Navy. And will set them back years.
The first fourteen units of the USN’s seventy-four Arleigh Burke-class destroyers are older than the RCN’s Halifax class frigates. With the Zumwalt-class canceled and now the DDG(X) at best “delayed”, the USN’s going to operating some of the older escorts in NATO.
 
Last edited:
Will add that Trump is actually wasting important ordinance that could help Ukraine and is needed to counter/deter China with these Africa strikes. All around strategic ignorance and madness.
 
He's trying to cement his position as worst president in recent history.

Recent history? Decently one of the worst in their entire history. We're only a year in. Just imagine what will be left of the US in 2029 when guys successor takes over.

I was listening to a podcast interview with conservative commentator and former War College professor Tom Nichols. He suggested that Trump is trying to provoke Venezuela in to a war so that he can claim war time powers. He suggested that this administration has been shopping for an easy war (in the sense of limited immediate impact to the US). And this might be it for them. First theory I've heard that actually makes sense for sending a whole carrier group to Venezuela.

Another thing that Prof Nichols said also struck me. He pointed out that in the first term, the economy was good. So people tolerated the shenanigans. Now the economy isn't great so the shenanigans look that much worse. And this might be motivating more desperate measures in the administration. From war to covering up economic statistics.

But really for us in Canada the question is how did we decouple without this becoming an absolute disaster?
 
They cancelled the DDG(X) program to fund this apparently. That's the word going around. If that's true, it's devastating to the US Navy. And will set them back years.
I see speculation that this might be a ploy to get Trump to prioritize DDG(X), by making it bigger (on paper) adding some useless WWII reminiscent guns and naming it after Trump to appeal to his vanity. The end result may end up being very much like the DDG(X) as envisioned.
 
I see speculation that this might be a ploy to get Trump to prioritize DDG(X), by making it bigger (on paper) adding some useless WWII reminiscent guns and naming it after Trump to appeal to his vanity. The end result may end up being very much like the DDG(X) as envisioned.
I've seen that theory. I don't buy it. That's not legislation for funding works. They have to buy exactly what Congress funda (not much different here with Parliament either). Let's just hope that Congress understands what cancelling DDG(X) means and refuses. Just like they did when the Secretary of DUIs (no doubt motivated by the South African tech bros) tried to cancel the Wedgetail purchases out of some harebrained idea to go completely space based. They actually saved the USAF from a disastrous administration decision. We'll see if they do the same for the USN shortly. Insane that we've reached the point where we have to rely on the US Congress to stop the US President from destroying the US military. Absolute clown show nobody could have seen coming.
 
Here's a question: if he dies, is there going be a return to some semblance of normal, or are things going to get worse? I mean, there's a side to Trump that'd practically wish for the latter.

It'd be like the difference btw/canning the ballroom project and restoring the East Wing, and the occupants (Miller et al) rigging the White House to blow up and consume everyone inside, once it's clear the jig is up. A Branch Davidian kind of symbolic gesture where there's no going back to a past normal.
 
Here's a question: if he dies, is there going be a return to some semblance of normal, or are things going to get worse? I mean, there's a side to Trump that'd practically wish for the latter.
No. The inmates fully run the asylum, and their friends on the outside are making the American public dumber by the second through social media. There will be no reckoning, after the catharsis of him dying, just more turmoil until the country eats itself alive.
 
The administration itself is quickly learning that ideology and slogans are no substitute for competence. They are seeing this in some of the departments they decimated. That's why trade deals are so difficult now.. And even the peace deals that he wants. The people with the knowledge of that stuff are gone.

People don't understand how deep this bench was. During by career, I used to admire this about the US. Whatever the topic was. A disease, a new technology, some terrorist group you've never heard of. There was a guy (or gal) somewhere in a cubicle in DC or in a USG research centre whose life mission was to understand it. And at the next meeting they'd bring out this expert.. How much of that will be left after Trump? It's not even the firings. How many if those people will want to work in government still?

So there's zero chance we're going back to what was there before. The question of what comes after is difficult. I do think Trump commands something of a unique coalition which will struggle to survive him and can't be passed on intact to any obvious survivor. We're already seeing fights between the Groypers who hate everything including Israel and the less (relatively) extreme America Firsters who think foreign policy should be isolationist except for Israel and neocon hawks who want to fight everywhere. Then we're seeing fights on immigration between the tech right and the rest. And this is before AI crushes a lot of entry level work. And on top of everything is a growing deficit and debt.. Interest payments are now larger than the defence budget in the US. Historically that used to be a marker of the decline of empires. So you now have fiscal Hawks who want deep cuts in everything (including defence in some cases). They have growing healthcare needs for an aging population and legitimate needs for higher military spending to counter China. How can they do that in a country that doesn't want to pay more? All of the above is about to explode into public crisis by the end of 2028 or shortly after. And it's really hard to tell which faction comes out on top after.

There are days I honestly wonder if this is what it was like to watch the decline of Rome or Persia or even the British Empire which went from "The Sun never sets" to full decolonization, IMF bailout and the end of the Pound as the global reserve currency in about half a century. Partly why so many Brits today still can't accept that they are better off in the EU.

For small fish like us the problem is that the alternatives are horrible. The Putinist view of spheres of influence reduces everyone else to economic colonies to exploit. The Chinese aren't actually far off in this idea either. Only for them we're all export markets to exploit. And since we refused to care about anything other than resources and real estate for decades, can we actually relearn enough to avoid our fate as a resource colony?
 
Last edited:
The administration itself is quickly learning that ideology and slogans are no substitute for competence. They are seeing this in some of the departments they decimated. That's why trade deals are so difficult now.. And even the peace deals that he wants. The people with the knowledge of that stuff are gone.

People don't understand how deep this bench was. During by career, I used to admire this about the US. Whatever the topic was. A disease, a new technology, some terrorist group you've never heard of. There was a guy (or gal) somewhere in a cubicle in DC or in a USG research centre whose life mission was to understand it. And at the next meeting they'd bring out this expert.. How much of that will be left after Trump? It's not even the firings. How many if those people will want to work in government still?

So there's zero chance we're going back to what was there before. The question of what comes after is difficult. I do think Trump commands something of a unique coalition which will struggle to survive him and can't be passed on intact to any obvious survivor. We're already seeing fights between the Groypers who hate everything including Israel and the less (relatively) extreme America Firsters who think foreign policy should be isolationist except for Israel and neocon hawks who want to fight everywhere. Then we're seeing fights on immigration between the tech right and the rest. And this is before AI crushes a lot of entry level work. And on top of everything is a growing deficit and debt.. Interest payments are now larger than the defence budget in the US. Historically that used to be a marker of the decline of empires. So you now have fiscal Hawks who want deep cuts in everything (including defence in some cases). They have growing healthcare needs for an aging population and legitimate needs for higher military spending to counter China. How can they do that in a country that doesn't want to pay more? All of the above is about to explode into public crisis by the end of 2028 or shortly after. And it's really hard to tell which faction comes out on top after.

There are days I honestly wonder if this is what it was like to watch the decline of Rome or Persia or even the British Empire which went from "The Sun never sets" to full decolonization, IMF bailout and the end of the Pound as the global reserve currency in about half a century. Partly why so many Brits today still can't accept that they are better off in the EU.

For small fish like us the problem is that the alternatives are horrible. The Putinist view of spheres of influence reduces everyone else to economic colonies to exploit. The Chinese aren't actually far off in this idea either. Only for them we're all export markets to exploit. And since we refused to care about anything other than resources and real estate for decades, can we actually relearn enough to avoid our fate as a resource colony?
'Coming to realize' perhaps, but I not so sure there is a lot of 'learning' going on. Even if they are starting to realize some things, I don't see a lot of evidence that it is changing anybody's direction. Much of the Administration (Executive/Cabinet) seems to be doubling down
 

Back
Top