News   Dec 16, 2025
 653     0 
News   Dec 16, 2025
 542     0 
News   Dec 16, 2025
 2.8K     8 

Finch West Line 6 LRT

Buses also typically travel at 10-15km faster than the posted limit especially when traffic is light.

But they don't have to wait for cars to turn first. So they do have a 30 second advantage at each red light.

That x16 stops is about 8 minutes faster. Plus the speed difference which might be up to double so there is your double the travel time and then some.

If the left-turn phase happens before the through phase, then how can the buses not wait for the left-turning cars coming from the opposite direction?
 
IF @lrt's friend is correct, then the City of Ottawa, alongside Alstom, already tried to "fix the bad part", but determined it would be too expensive to pursue.

Remember, these are low floor LRVs. The wheels are fixed into the chassis/ body of the tram. Hence why they can't handle turns all that well.

High floor LRVs have more traditional bogies and wheels, which allow them to handle turns better, and at higher speeds. Plus less stress on the wheels.

Low floor LRVs are also more expensive to maintain because you essentially have to lift the entire chassis of the train up in order to work on the wheels and bogies. High floor LRVs are much easier to work on.

Look at Edmonton and Calgary's LRT systems. They have high floor LRVs still running from the 1980's. Will we get 10-15 years out of these low floor LRVs?

I'm sure someone on this forum who is more knowledgeable on rolling stock could explain all of this better than myself.
Nope.

Some of Toronto's Flexity Outlooks for the streetcar system have retired already.
 
Sure, but apparently, in regards to line 6, the consortium is refusing to run them faster due to an increase in maintenance costs.

Does this have anything to do with the fact that low floor trams are expensive to maintain?


This is not an accurate statement.

The ttc suggested that they'd need agreement from the consortium or else nothing in the operating side could change. We have zero evidence that the statement itself accurately describes the contract and we have zero evidence that all parties would be against any changes. We dont even know if ttc was telling the truth because the line was planned for much faster trains. Surly the consortiums signed a contract stipulating to those estimated speeds?

During the testing faze we saw much faster times. It wasnt until trains were running RSD (full ttc involvement) that ppl began reporting slower speeds. Hmmm... remember too that the line was delayed for over a year, according to some reports, due to ttc interference (as interpreted by the consortium) hmmm. I for one would like to know what was happening there ...

Ultimately there's not enough that we know and zero reason to believe any of the parties involved here, especially the TTC who are driving these cars like a downtown street car, which no one on planet earth, besides the ttc, would ever do.

Which again leads me to believe that the ttc COULD run these trains faster but are unwilling to do so to avoid whatever potential fallout if things don't run according to their "safety standards".

Theres is video in this thread of street cars running in mixed traffic extremely aggressively for toronto standards. This appears good enough for humans across the pond. Does the ttc even consider such operations as feasible?

Remember, the upper echelons of public service are almost political positions. Such ppl are not immune to giving the political answer to avoid total responsibility and to save their jobs.
 
Last edited:
Part of the problem here is not the technology, but rather the culture. Transit managers simply don't care how long it takes riders to get where they are going, and politicians will not direct them to do so.

In Ottawa this manifests itself in trains crawling around not very sharp curves for years. And in the mess that is the airport spur, which was built with a pocket track for 90 second transfers then operated from day one with a 7 minute transfer instead, which the city and media seem to have conspired never to mention out loud. Someone posted a cab video recently with a 90 second dwell at Uplands station, where 3 passengers were boarding.

The uproar over Finch is the first time any politician or transit agency has signalled the least awareness that travel time is even a thing, and we need to strike while the iron is hot to ensure this remains an issue.
 
Part of the problem here is not the technology, but rather the culture. Transit managers simply don't care how long it takes riders to get where they are going, and politicians will not direct them to do so.

In Ottawa this manifests itself in trains crawling around not very sharp curves for years. And in the mess that is the airport spur, which was built with a pocket track for 90 second transfers then operated from day one with a 7 minute transfer instead, which the city and media seem to have conspired never to mention out loud. Someone posted a cab video recently with a 90 second dwell at Uplands station, where 3 passengers were boarding.

The uproar over Finch is the first time any politician or transit agency has signalled the least awareness that travel time is even a thing, and we need to strike while the iron is hot to ensure this remains an issue.
The Ottawa airport train is slower than a bicycle. And it has conflicts with train traffic at the diamond.
 
Remember, these are low floor LRVs. The wheels are fixed into the chassis/ body of the tram. Hence why they can't handle turns all that well.
This is unequivocally not true for most low floor LRVs, and especially not with the Citadis cars used in Ottawa, Finch West and Hurontario.

Go look at a Finch West car and tell me how the trucks are not supposed to pivot but still allow the things to turn.

Dan
So.... swap the vehicles more often to distribute the wear?
This is already baked into the scheduling and dispatching software not just of the LRTs but also of the subways and buses.

Dan
 
Part of the problem here is not the technology, but rather the culture. Transit managers simply don't care how long it takes riders to get where they are going, and politicians will not direct them to do so.

In Ottawa this manifests itself in trains crawling around not very sharp curves for years. And in the mess that is the airport spur, which was built with a pocket track for 90 second transfers then operated from day one with a 7 minute transfer instead, which the city and media seem to have conspired never to mention out loud. Someone posted a cab video recently with a 90 second dwell at Uplands station, where 3 passengers were boarding.

The uproar over Finch is the first time any politician or transit agency has signalled the least awareness that travel time is even a thing, and we need to strike while the iron is hot to ensure this remains an issue.

Yes.

Apart from obviously annoying the riders, unnecessarily slow movement results in higher operating costs. That part of the situation is not immediately visible, but the basic math says that.

Let's say you have a 10 km long transit line, you want service frequency = every 5 min, and each car needs 5 min at each terminus for recovery. How many cars do you need in service? That depends on the speed of operation.

At 25 kph average: roundtrip duration is (10 + 10) / 25 * 60 = 48 min, plus 2 x 5 min for terminal recovery. That's 58 min total. You need 58 / 5 = 11.6, rounded 12 cars.

At 15 kph average: roundtrip duration is (10 + 10) / 15 * 60 = 80 min, plus 2 x 5 min for terminal recovery. That's 90 min total. You need 90 / 5 = 18 cars. Thus, more to be spent on the drivers salaries, more space needed at the yard, more cars to maintain, etc.

It should be stressed that 18 cars in the second scenario do not actually provide any more service than 12 cars in the first scenario. The frequency is 5 min in both cases, the passenger load is the same of both cases, the number of riders per day is the same in both cases.

One might be tempted to feel that 18 cars on line provide more "service" than 12 cars on line. But in reality, those artificially slowed 18 cars are just doing the job of 12 cars.
 
Go look at a Finch West car and tell me how the trucks are not supposed to pivot but still allow the things to turn.
They can turn, they just can't do it very well. Look at all the issues Ottawa is having with the Citadis. Years after opening the Confederation Line, and they still have to slow the trains down when turning. Look at how slow the Citadis moves on Line 6 when entering and exiting Humber College.

Why are both OC transpo and the TTC operating the Citadis at such slow speeds when they hit a turn? Does OC Transpo have the same obsession with safety as the TTC does?
 
Last edited:

Back
Top