News   Mar 14, 2025
 103     0 
News   Mar 14, 2025
 252     0 
News   Mar 13, 2025
 1.1K     7 

President Donald Trump's United States of America

Pope Francis supports U.S. Bishops in migrant advocacy​

Pope Francis addresses a letter to the bishops of the United States, expressing his support for their efforts to protect the rights and dignity of migrants.

From https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2025-02/pope-francis-us-bishops-migration-deportation-human-dignity-righ.html


Please find below the full text of Pope Francis' letter to the U.S. Bishops:

Dear Brothers in the Episcopate,

I am writing today to address a few words to you in these delicate moments that you are living as Pastors of the People of God who walk together in the United States of America.

1. The journey from slavery to freedom that the People of Israel traveled, as narrated in the Book of Exodus, invites us to look at the reality of our time, so clearly marked by the phenomenon of migration, as a decisive moment in history to reaffirm not only our faith in a God who is always close, incarnate, migrant and refugee, but also the infinite and transcendent dignity of every human person.[1]

2. These words with which I begin are not an artificial construct. Even a cursory examination of the Church’s social doctrine emphatically shows that Jesus Christ is the true Emmanuel (cf.Mt1:23); he did not live apart from the difficult experience of being expelled from his own land because of an imminent risk to his life, and from the experience of having to take refuge in a society and a culture foreign to his own. The Son of God, in becoming man, also chose to live the drama of immigration. I like to recall, among other things, the words with which Pope Pius XII began his Apostolic Constitution on the Care of Migrants, which is considered the “Magna Carta” of the Church’s thinking on migration:

“The family of Nazareth in exile, Jesus, Mary and Joseph, emigrants in Egypt and refugees there to escape the wrath of an ungodly king, are the model, the example and the consolation of emigrants and pilgrims of every age and country, of all refugees of every condition who, beset by persecution or necessity, are forced to leave their homeland, beloved family and dear friends for foreign lands.”[2]

3. Likewise, Jesus Christ, loving everyone with a universal love, educates us in the permanent recognition of the dignity of every human being, without exception. In fact, when we speak of “infinite and transcendent dignity,” we wish to emphasize that the most decisive value possessed by the human person surpasses and sustains every other juridical consideration that can be made to regulate life in society. Thus, all the Christian faithful and people of good will are called upon to consider the legitimacy of norms and public policies in the light of the dignity of the person and his or her fundamental rights, not vice versa.

4. I have followed closely the major crisis that is taking place in the United States with the initiation of a program of mass deportations. The rightly formed conscience cannot fail to make a critical judgment and express its disagreement with any measure that tacitly or explicitly identifies the illegal status of some migrants with criminality. At the same time, one must recognize the right of a nation to defend itself and keep communities safe from those who have committed violent or serious crimes while in the country or prior to arrival. That said, the act of deporting people who in many cases have left their own land for reasons of extreme poverty, insecurity, exploitation, persecution or serious deterioration of the environment, damages the dignity of many men and women, and of entire families, and places them in a state of particular vulnerability and defenselessness.

5. This is not a minor issue: an authentic rule of law is verified precisely in the dignified treatment that all people deserve, especially the poorest and most marginalized. The true common good is promoted when society and government, with creativity and strict respect for the rights of all — as I have affirmed on numerous occasions — welcomes, protects, promotes and integrates the most fragile, unprotected and vulnerable. This does not impede the development of a policy that regulates orderly and legal migration. However, this development cannot come about through the privilege of some and the sacrifice of others. What is built on the basis of force, and not on the truth about the equal dignity of every human being, begins badly and will end badly.

6. Christians know very well that it is only by affirming the infinite dignity of all that our own identity as persons and as communities reaches its maturity. Christian love is not a concentric expansion of interests that little by little extend to other persons and groups. In other words: the human person is not a mere individual, relatively expansive, with some philanthropic feelings! The human person is a subject with dignity who, through the constitutive relationship with all, especially with the poorest, can gradually mature in his identity and vocation. The trueordo amoristhat must be promoted is that which we discover by meditating constantly on the parable of the “Good Samaritan” (cf.Lk10:25-37), that is, by meditating on the love that builds a fraternity open to all, without exception.[3]

7. But worrying about personal, community or national identity, apart from these considerations, easily introduces an ideological criterion that distorts social life and imposes the will of the strongest as the criterion of truth.

8. I recognize your valuable efforts, dear brother bishops of the United States, as you work closely with migrants and refugees, proclaiming Jesus Christ and promoting fundamental human rights. God will richly reward all that you do for the protection and defense of those who are considered less valuable, less important or less human!

9. I exhort all the faithful of the Catholic Church, and all men and women of good will, not to give in to narratives that discriminate against and cause unnecessary suffering to our migrant and refugee brothers and sisters. With charity and clarity we are all called to live in solidarity and fraternity, to build bridges that bring us ever closer together, to avoid walls of ignominy and to learn to give our lives as Jesus Christ gave his for the salvation of all.

10. Let us ask Our Lady of Guadalupe to protect individuals and families who live in fear or pain due to migration and/or deportation. May the “Virgen morena”, who knew how to reconcile peoples when they were at enmity, grant us all to meet again as brothers and sisters, within her embrace, and thus take a step forward in the construction of a society that is more fraternal, inclusive and respectful of the dignity of all.

Fraternally,


Francis


From the Vatican, 10 February 2025
 
So that's up to 4 new states that he want's to acquire. That is, Canada, Greenland, Panama and now Gaza. I hope they'll all vote blue... /s
Speaking of Greenland and Denmark, I find it interesting that we never see mention of the last time the USA acquired Danish territory.


If Denmark was willing to sell off its overseas territory and its resident citizens to the USA in the 1916, Trump could reasonably ask, why not do it again 110 years later?
 
Last edited:
If Denmark was willing to sell off its overseas territory and its resident citizens to the USA in the 1916, Trump could reasonably ask, why not do it again 110 years later?
Only if Denmark is willing and that's the key thing here. (There is no evidence they are.) And there's nothing reasonable about Trump. Two strikes in and he hasn't even gone up to bat yet.
 
Speaking of Greenland and Denmark, I find it interesting that we never see mention of the last time the USA acquired Danish territory.


If Denmark was willing to sell off its overseas territory and its resident citizens to the USA in the 1916, Trump could reasonably ask, why not do it again 110 years later?

That was in a world with no long distance flights and no internet. Governance of remote colonies was difficult. And it made sense to give up territory to a friendly ally.

Now we're dealing with an aggressor who is threatening to invade or coerce. Very different situation.
 
That was in a world with no long distance flights and no internet. Governance of remote colonies was difficult. And it made sense to give up territory to a friendly ally.
The US was not a friendly ally. They aggressively coerced Denmark to relinquish their Caribbean islands because the US was worried that Germany may seize Denmark and then gain control of the islands, right off the US coast.
 
That would require a divorce first. Or bigamy.

Psssh. Fake a marriage! 😆
Ha! He loves Italy and is an Italian wannabe. Loves the food, wine and wardrobe. We will be upping our Italian wine choices now that California cabs are off the table so long as Trump is busy being Trump.

I would suggest Ciro wines from Calabria. Especially a Rosato. Those are excellent in the summer, slightly chilled, with some taralli and olives for snacking.
 
Your parents could have done that for you. As an immigrant myself, it's one of the first things I did when my kids arrived, securing their UK citizenship and passports. Of course my goal was to give them the chance to live and work in the EU without restrictions, which Brexit scuppered. But still, it's my parental gift to them.
Yes, there was a window where that was possible, but it closed long ago.
 
The US was not a friendly ally. They aggressively coerced Denmark to relinquish their Caribbean islands because the US was worried that Germany may seize Denmark and then gain control of the islands, right off the US coast.
If Trump aggressively pushes for Greenland, there's very little that poor tiny Denmark can do about it, especially when the Greenlanders themselves appear to be open to closer relations with the US. It's quite fascinating to see US expansionism in real time. I assumed that era was long dead.
 
If Denmark was willing to sell off its overseas territory and its resident citizens to the USA in the 1916, Trump could reasonably ask, why not do it again 110 years later?

Lots of good reasons have already been mentioned upthread, but I'll add another:

David R. Barker of the University of Iowa stated that the acquisition of the Virgin Islands "is the clearest example of a negative net present value purchase" among US territorial acquisitions. "Expenses are high, and net revenues have been non-existent", he wrote; because of the Naval Appropriations Act For 1922, all tax revenue goes to the local government.[25]

Incidentally, this would be a good instructional manual for Denmark on how to proceed. If the Yanks are insistent on picking up Greenland, Denmark will be powerless to resist them, so they should at least make sure they get nothing out of it.
 
If Trump aggressively pushes for Greenland, there's very little that poor tiny Denmark can do about it, especially when the Greenlanders themselves appear to be open to closer relations with the US. It's quite fascinating to see US expansionism in real time. I assumed that era was long dead.
If that is so, there is a difference between open closer relationship with the US and become a part of them. In fact, it could be argued that we would like closer relationship with the US, doesn’t mean we want to become part of them. Not even in the slightest…

…this is why tariffs suck, at the same time know where they can stuff their land grab demands. I don’t know why people are not getting this….as it really should be said without saying.
 

Back
Top