Recent content by cateran

Approved at C of A with the following conditions:

Approved at C of A with the following conditions:

First phase of this project is expected to start construction next year https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threads/toronto-the-hangar-district-74m-23s-northcrest-perkins-eastman.35071/post-2323787

According to this CNN article, this is starting construction soon https://www.cnn.com/travel/toronto-downsview-airport-yzd-c2e-spc

Mount Dennis already includes a UPX stop https://www.metrolinx.com/en/projects-and-programs/eglinton-crosstown-lrt/what-were-building

Decision Report - Approval Recommended to the next meeting of EYCC: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.EY26.5

Decision Report - Approval Recommended to the next meeting of EYCC: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.EY26.2

EHON has released draft legislation that they plan to present to the present to the Planning and Housing Committee on October 30th, 2025 for expanding retail in neighbourhoods...

On September 2nd 2024, there seems to have been a resubmission here bumping the height back to 17 storeys from 14 storeys and increasing the # of units to 296 (I imagine there are other changes too) Updated AIC link since the one at the top of the form doesn't seem to work for me...

Approval recommended at next meeting of the NYCC: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.NY26.8

Decision Report - Approval Recommended to the next meeting of NYCC: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.NY26.5 Also buildings look very different now

Would you be able to provide your sources that say it costs proportionally more for the city to provide amenities to higher density areas? I am assuming by “an even larger premium” you mean that it is per capita more expensive to service these areas I ask because I have only heard the opposite...

OPA 778 (expanding Avenues, removing Avenue Studies, and allowing mid-rise as-of-right on Avenues) made progress at the OLT with the appelants allowing the unappealed sections to go into effect The only city-wide section that is still being appealed is the required ground floor activation for...

This was approved at the OLT without changes and they have removed themselves as one of the appelants to OPA 778 Case Information

According to the TTC there is now a slow zone there where there wasn't one a week ago As to why that is? I am not nearly connected enough to give you any sort of answer to that