OpenClosed
Active Member
It really is a wacky design, makes sense for Mississauga though, definitely not ugly though
It really is a wacky design, makes sense for Mississauga though, definitely not ugly though
The thing about Mississauga is it has so many kind of architectural anomalies that it fits in m1 and M2 M3 under construction and I can't remember the name of the other two buildings going to own being a country boy on this oneIt really is a wacky design, makes sense for Mississauga though, definitely not ugly though![]()
Yeah, I think Mississauga should get some award for thatThe thing about Mississauga is it has so many kind of architectural anomalies that it fits in m1 and M2 M3 under construction and I can't remember the name of the other two buildings going to own being a country boy on this one![]()
Up close it doesnāt look really tall for some reason, yet far away itās massiveI tried my best whilst riding on the busā¦
View attachment 623029
Perspective is exactly right when you see it from a distance you can compare it to the entire skyline whereas up close your simply looking dead on at it with no real comparables near byUp close it doesnāt look really tall for some reason, yet far away itās massive
Maybe itās a perspective thing![]()
That actually makes alot of sense, it is very noticeable when you look from the entrance of square one, I still think itās a bit odd but at least itās not on any of the boxy towers lolItās more eye level when youāre a pedestrian. They thought it through even though some people donāt accept the explanation.